PURPOSE: To study the long-term anatomic and visual outcomes after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT). This study assesses the frequency of complications, changes in visual acuity, and changes in anatomical central macular thickness after macular surgery. METHODS: This retrospective, single-site, single-surgeon study reviewed 40 medical records (45 eyes) of patients at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center requiring PPV with ILM peeling (n=27) or without ILM peeling (n=18) for VMT between the years of 2003 and 2016. Successful surgery was defined as the relief of anatomical traction, and the absence of a second surgery, or any post-operative complications (n=42). Visual acuity was documented for each eye prior to surgery and post surgery. RESULTS: All 27 (100%) eyes that had ILM peeling had successfully resolved macular traction following a single surgery, and 15 of the 18 (83.3%) eyes without ILM peel were successful. None of 27 (0%) eyes that had ILM peeling required a second surgery, nor did they have complications. 3 of the 18 (16.7%) eyes without ILM peeling required a second surgery. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) improved significantly in both groups: BCVA improved from 0.59 ± 0.29 preoperatively to 0.37 ± 0.25 postoperatively in eyes receiving ILM peeling and from 0.77 ± 0.37 to 0.53 ± 0.37 in eyes with PPV only. Mean change in CMT pre-operatively to post-operatively was found to be greater in eyes with PPV alone, but this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series shows that PPV with ILM peeling for VMT relieved macular traction better than PPV alone, although there was no significant difference in visual acuity outcomes or central macular thickness between the two groups. Further research is required to validate these findings. / 2019-07-11T00:00:00Z

This consecutive nonrandomized comparative interventional study was designed to examine the association between pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the treatment of idiopathic macular holes (IMH). The ILM is the innermost layer of the retina. The macula is located within the retina, and is responsible for central vision. Although IMH manifests in a relatively small region within the retina, patients notice significant drops in visual acuity up to the 20/400 - 20/800 level (legally blind in the affected eye). In the literature, the anatomic success rate of macular hole surgery has been reported between 48% - 94%. To best treat idiopathic macular holes, it is imperative that physicians have access to the most up-to-date information regarding the treatment outcomes. This study included 55 eyes of 52 patients who received surgery at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for idiopathic macular holes between December 1999 and January 2015. Patients were non-randomly assigned to PPV with or without ILM peeling. Early patients did not receive ILM peeling, while more recent patients did. The primary endpoint measured was macular hole (MH) status as established by ocular coherence tomography (OCT) within 6 to 12 months of the vii procedure. 36 out of 39 (92.3%) eyes in the ILM peeling group had closed MH. In the comparison group without ILM peeling, 11 out of 16 (68.8%) eyes had closed MH. In comparison to the conventional PPV without ILM peeling, these findings suggest that PPV with ILM peeling is associated with a significantly higher anatomic success rate (OR, 5.45; [95% CI, 1.12 to 26.55]; P = 0.023). / 2018-06-16T00:00:00Z

1 Abstract Introduction The vitreoretinal (VR) interface of the eye is a dynamically evolving environment which significantly influences and indicates the course of macular disorders. The main topic of the presented paper is research on the VR interface in relation to surgery on diabetic macular edema (ME), partial macular defects (PMD) and idiopathic macular holes (IMH). Aims The aims of the research were to find out new knowledge about specific characteristics of and changes in the VR interface in eyes with diabetic ME, PMD and IMH, namely with main attention focused on the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina and the epimacular membrane (EMM). Methods Histopathologic and morphometric analyses were carried out on samples of the ILM of the retina and the EMM which were taken during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) of eyes of sets of patients with diabetic ME, PMD and IMH. The analytic results were statistically evaluated and interpreted in relation to clinical factors and anatomical results of the PPV. Results Treatment of diabetic ME with removal of the ILM resulted in improved visual acuity (VA), at minimum 2 lines on the ETDRS table, in 51.8% surgically treated eyes and remained the same in 33.9% of eyes. A comparison study confirmed that PPV with preserving of the ILM achieved a long-term...

1 Abstract Introduction The vitreoretinal (VR) interface of the eye is a dynamically evolving environment which significantly influences and indicates the course of macular disorders. The main topic of the presented paper is research on the VR interface in relation to surgery on diabetic macular edema (ME), partial macular defects (PMD) and idiopathic macular holes (IMH). Aims The aims of the research were to find out new knowledge about specific characteristics of and changes in the VR interface in eyes with diabetic ME, PMD and IMH, namely with main attention focused on the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the retina and the epimacular membrane (EMM). Methods Histopathologic and morphometric analyses were carried out on samples of the ILM of the retina and the EMM which were taken during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) of eyes of sets of patients with diabetic ME, PMD and IMH. The analytic results were statistically evaluated and interpreted in relation to clinical factors and anatomical results of the PPV. Results Treatment of diabetic ME with removal of the ILM resulted in improved visual acuity (VA), at minimum 2 lines on the ETDRS table, in 51.8% surgically treated eyes and remained the same in 33.9% of eyes. A comparison study confirmed that PPV with preserving of the ILM achieved a long-term...

Objetivo: Estudar e comparar a acuidade visual, metamorfopsia, espessura foveal, camada limitante externa e zona elipsoide por meio da Tomografia de Coerência Óptica (OCT), e a taxa de recorrência dos pacientes operados de remoção de membrana epirretiniana, com e sem a retirada da membrana limitante interna. Métodos: Pacientes com MER operados por um único cirurgião e randomizados, aleatoriamente, em dois grupos. Todos os pacientes tiveram a retirada da membrana epirretiniana: 35 pacientes do Grupo 01, sem a adicional retirada de membrana limitante interna, e 28 pacientes do Grupo 02, com a retirada dessa membrana. Os pacientes foram seguidos e avaliados no primeiro, terceiro e sexto mês. Resultados: Setenta pacientes operados no total, sendo sete excluídos por perda de seguimento. Os pacientes de ambos os grupos evoluíram com melhora gradativa da visão ao longo do tempo. No Grupo 01, a média de acuidade visual inicial foi 0,60 logMAR (±0,3 desvio padrão - DP), no primeiro mês foi 0,49 logMAR (±0,26 DP), no terceiro mês, 0,39 logMAR (±0,30 DP) e no sexto mês, 0,27 logMAR (±0,25 DP). No Grupo 02, a média de acuidade visual inicial foi 0,63 logMAR (±0,25 DP), no primeiro mês foi 0,44 logMAR (±0,26 DP), no terceiro mês, 0,41 logMAR (±0,35 DP), e no sexto mês, 0,43 logMAR (0,44 DP). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante quanto à melhora da acuidade visual entre os dois grupos. Não foi encontrada diferença estatisticamente significante em relação às alterações na OCT entre os grupos. O Grupo 02 apresentou maior taxa de recidiva (17%) quando comparada com o Grupo 01 (3,6%), embora esta diferença não foi estatisticamente significante (p=0,09). Conclusão: Ambos os grupos apresentaram melhora funcional e anatômica semelhantes, mas o grupo no qual não se removeu a membrana limitante interna mostrou uma possível tendência à maior taxa de recidiva / Objective: To study and compare the visual acuity, metamorphosis, foveal thickness, the outer limiting layer and the ellipsoid zone, studied by Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT), and the recurrence rate of patients undergoing removal of epiretinal membrane with and without the removal of the internal limiting membrane. Methods: Seventy patients undergoing removal of epiretinal membrane, by a single surgeon and randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1, without additional removal of internal limiting membrane, 35 patients, and group 2 with the removal of the internal limiting membrane, 28 patients. Both groups were followed and evaluated in the first, third and sixth month. Results: Patients of both groups developed with a gradual improvement of vision over time. In group 1, the mean initial visual acuity was 0.60 logMAR (±0.3 standard deviation - SD), the average visual acuity of the first month was 0.49 logMAR (±0.26 SD), in the third month 0.39 logMAR (±0.30 DP), and in the sixth month logMAR 0.27 (±0.25 SD). In group 2, the mean initial visual acuity was 0.63 logMAR (±0.25 SD), average visual acuity of the first month was 0.44 (±0.26 DP) logMAR, in the third month 0.41 logMAR (±0.35 DP), and in the sixth month 0.43 logMAR (±0.44 DP). There was no statistical difference in improvement in visual acuity between the two groups, there was no statistically significant differences related to tomographic alterations between the groups, but the group 2 showed a higher relapse rate (17%) compared to the group 1 (3.6%). Although the difference is not statistically significant (p=0.09). Conclusion: Both groups showed similar functional and anatomical improvement, but the group which the internal limiting membrane was not removed showed a higher recurrence rate

Objetivo: Estudar e comparar a acuidade visual, metamorfopsia, espessura foveal, camada limitante externa e zona elipsoide por meio da Tomografia de Coerência Óptica (OCT), e a taxa de recorrência dos pacientes operados de remoção de membrana epirretiniana, com e sem a retirada da membrana limitante interna. Métodos: Pacientes com MER operados por um único cirurgião e randomizados, aleatoriamente, em dois grupos. Todos os pacientes tiveram a retirada da membrana epirretiniana: 35 pacientes do Grupo 01, sem a adicional retirada de membrana limitante interna, e 28 pacientes do Grupo 02, com a retirada dessa membrana. Os pacientes foram seguidos e avaliados no primeiro, terceiro e sexto mês. Resultados: Setenta pacientes operados no total, sendo sete excluídos por perda de seguimento. Os pacientes de ambos os grupos evoluíram com melhora gradativa da visão ao longo do tempo. No Grupo 01, a média de acuidade visual inicial foi 0,60 logMAR (±0,3 desvio padrão - DP), no primeiro mês foi 0,49 logMAR (±0,26 DP), no terceiro mês, 0,39 logMAR (±0,30 DP) e no sexto mês, 0,27 logMAR (±0,25 DP). No Grupo 02, a média de acuidade visual inicial foi 0,63 logMAR (±0,25 DP), no primeiro mês foi 0,44 logMAR (±0,26 DP), no terceiro mês, 0,41 logMAR (±0,35 DP), e no sexto mês, 0,43 logMAR (0,44 DP). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante quanto à melhora da acuidade visual entre os dois grupos. Não foi encontrada diferença estatisticamente significante em relação às alterações na OCT entre os grupos. O Grupo 02 apresentou maior taxa de recidiva (17%) quando comparada com o Grupo 01 (3,6%), embora esta diferença não foi estatisticamente significante (p=0,09). Conclusão: Ambos os grupos apresentaram melhora funcional e anatômica semelhantes, mas o grupo no qual não se removeu a membrana limitante interna mostrou uma possível tendência à maior taxa de recidiva / Objective: To study and compare the visual acuity, metamorphosis, foveal thickness, the outer limiting layer and the ellipsoid zone, studied by Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT), and the recurrence rate of patients undergoing removal of epiretinal membrane with and without the removal of the internal limiting membrane. Methods: Seventy patients undergoing removal of epiretinal membrane, by a single surgeon and randomly assigned into two groups. Group 1, without additional removal of internal limiting membrane, 35 patients, and group 2 with the removal of the internal limiting membrane, 28 patients. Both groups were followed and evaluated in the first, third and sixth month. Results: Patients of both groups developed with a gradual improvement of vision over time. In group 1, the mean initial visual acuity was 0.60 logMAR (±0.3 standard deviation - SD), the average visual acuity of the first month was 0.49 logMAR (±0.26 SD), in the third month 0.39 logMAR (±0.30 DP), and in the sixth month logMAR 0.27 (±0.25 SD). In group 2, the mean initial visual acuity was 0.63 logMAR (±0.25 SD), average visual acuity of the first month was 0.44 (±0.26 DP) logMAR, in the third month 0.41 logMAR (±0.35 DP), and in the sixth month 0.43 logMAR (±0.44 DP). There was no statistical difference in improvement in visual acuity between the two groups, there was no statistically significant differences related to tomographic alterations between the groups, but the group 2 showed a higher relapse rate (17%) compared to the group 1 (3.6%). Although the difference is not statistically significant (p=0.09). Conclusion: Both groups showed similar functional and anatomical improvement, but the group which the internal limiting membrane was not removed showed a higher recurrence rate