Spelling suggestions: "subject:"interorganizational corelations"" "subject:"interorganizational conelations""
1 |
Interorganizational relationships and innovation an empirical investigation of the effects of IT infrastructure, task characteristics and tie strength /Patrakosol, Buraj. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2006. / Title from title screen (viewed Mar. 12, 2007). PDF text: v, 135 p. : ill. UMI publication number: AAT 3225994. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche format.
|
2 |
Dydadic interorganizational relations a Malaysian case study /Kamsah, Mohd. Fadzilah. January 1984 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1984. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 192-203).
|
3 |
Collaboration in the third sector : towards a framework of understanding /Mutch, Allyson. January 2005 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of Queensland, 2005. / Includes bibliography.
|
4 |
Do the actors make the play? : personnel mobility and the dissolution of interorganizational relationships /Broschak, Joseph Paul, January 1999 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 1999. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 198-210). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.
|
5 |
Designing institutions for inter-agency cooperation : a study of landslide management in Hong Kong /Chan, So-ngor. January 2001 (has links)
Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
6 |
Understanding governance mechanisms of buyer-supplier relationships in emerging marketsZhang, Qiyuan, 张起元 January 2014 (has links)
Interfirm governance has been the subject of buyer-supplier relationships studies for decades. Given the substantial hazards and uncertainties involved in interfirm exchanges, governance devices becomes critical in ensuring satisfactory performance outcomes. Despite the great insights provided by extant governance literature, the complexity of governance mechanisms has not been fully addressed. The goal of this dissertation is to better understand the role of contractual and relational governance in influencing interfirm co-exploration, protecting transaction-specific investments, and fostering interfirm exchanges in the challenging context of China.
The first study looks at how contracts function in emerging economies in which legal institutions are underdeveloped but guanxi norms are pervasive. Drawing on transaction cost economics and institutional theory, this study disentangles two facets of contractual governance: (1) task specificity, which primarily safeguards transactions, and (2) contingency specificity, which mainly coordinates adaptations. This study examines their direct effects on exchange performance and their contingent effects, given different levels of legal inadequacy and guanxi importance. A survey of 307 manufacturer–supplier dyads in China reveals that, compared with contingency specificity, task specificity is associated with better exchange performance. However, the role of task specificity declines when the legal system is inadequate and guanxi is important. In contrast, contingency specificity is more helpful when guanxi importance is high.
The second study explores how relational ties affect exchange partners’ co-exploration of novel products and processes. A tension between the strength and brokerage dimension of relational ties becomes evident during buyer-supplier co-exploration. Tie strength facilitates coordinating but creates the novelty problem; tie brokerage expands the knowledge diversity but aggravates the coordination difficulty. Drawing on the relational exchange theory, this study compares and examines the contingent value of tie strength and tie brokerage under different levels of environmental factors and exchange characteristics. The findings from a survey of 396 manufacturer–supplier dyads in China show that guanxi importance increases the effects of strength while decreases the value of brokerage. As market uncertainty increases, the role of brokerage becomes more salient. Brokerage also exerts a stronger impact on co-exploration when exchange is highly formalized, whereas tie strength has a weaker impact when exchange centralization is high. / published_or_final_version / Business / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy
|
7 |
An examination of determinants and performance implications of relational norms in supply chains : evidence from ChinaWang, Luning 01 January 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Examining partnerships in amateur sport : the case of a Canadian national sport centreBabiak, Katherine M 11 1900 (has links)
This study explored the dynamics, challenges, and complexities encountered in forming, managing,
and evaluating the interorganizational relationships of a nonprofit organization and its partners in the
public, nonprofit, and commercial sectors. Using a partnership process model developed from various
theoretical frameworks (Kouwenhoven, 1993; Oliver, 1990; Provan & Milward, 2001; Wood & Gray,
1991), this study examined three phases of partnership relationships (i.e., formation, management, and
evaluation) to gain a better understanding of the interactions among partnering organizations in
Canadian sport.
Qualitative research methods were employed to investigate partnerships of one National Sport
Centre (NSC). Data were collected from three sources: 28 interviews, 110 organizational documents, and
attendance at three organizational meetings. Interviews, relevant document passages, and field notes
were transcribed and analyzed using Atlas.ti, a qualitative analysis software program.
Results indicated that environmental and organizational conditions facilitated the formation of
partnerships. Interdependence among organizations, presence of a broker, presence of a network, and
convergence of objectives were evident. Specific reasons for partnership formation included efficiency,
stability, necessity, legitimacy, reciprocity, and asymmetry.
Partnership management structures and processes were central to interactions between
organizations. Partners struggled to find a balance between pressures to compete and pressures to
collaborate. Power imbalances, political dynamics, and control issues primarily related to resource
concerns existed, and in some cases weakened the bonds among partners. Some partnerships were
formalized, while others were loosely structured and primarily based on mutual trust, previous history,
and personal interest. Ambiguities regarding roles and responsibilities, and 'representativeness' influenced
how partners interacted and contributed to challenges in managing partnerships. Allocating resources
was a prime concern for the organizations.
Several levels of analysis for outcome evaluation existed. At the community level, the
performance of NSC athletes at international competitions' was a key measure of success. At the network
level, effective coordination of programs and services contributing to improved performances of athletes
was perceived as an important measure of effectiveness. Finally at the organizational level, factors
including ability to attract and retain partners, ability to remain economically viable through resource
acquisition, and achieving legitimacy were all viewed as criteria to evaluate partnership effectiveness.
|
9 |
Explaining EDI-based electronic cooperation in customer-supplier interfirm relationships : an empirical studySon, Jai-Yeol 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Interorganizational favor exchange : definition, types, and outcomes /Nguyen, Adam (Phuong). January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University, 2005. Graduate Programme in Administration. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 322-339). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=1&did=1283957761&SrchMode=1&sid=1&Fmt=2&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1194976887&clientId=5220
|
Page generated in 0.1628 seconds