No description available.

No description available.

The primary focus of this study was to assess children's and adolescents' perceptions of the ways in which peers respond to stressful conflicts that occur amongst them. Key variables that were examined were the social context (a dyad relationship versus a group relationship) and the social atmosphere (a compatible relationship versus an incompatible relationship) in which the conflict occurred. Scenarios were developed to simulate, as close as possible, realistic stressful conflicts that might typically arise in the daily lives of school age children and adolescents. Children and adolescents across three grade levels (1, 5, and 10) were administered a peer report measure in which they indicated to what extent they believed their same-sex peers would respond aggressively. The first part of the procedure required participants to listen to either a social scenario (someone who had been a member of a club was asked to leave) or an academic scenario (someone was given a bad grade by a peer) that described a conflict between two protagonists. The results of this study revealed that, as predicted, females endorsed significantly more aggressive responses for the compatible dyad context compared to the compatible group, incompatible dyad and incompatible group contexts. This finding occurred for overt, covert and withdrawn forms of aggression. These findings were also consistent across the three grade levels. Contrary to the hypothesis, males did not believe that their peers would behave differently across social contexts or atmospheres. Males did however report a higher level of overt and withdrawn aggression than females when the dyad and group conditions were combined. There were no gender differences in the aggressive responses for covert aggression. The implications of females' beliefs that degree of aggression would be highest in the intimate compatible dyad relationship compared to the other relationship contexts were discussed.

published_or_final_version / Psychology / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

No description available.

In this dissertation, I provide a discourse and narrative analysis of actual conflict talk episodes from mediation sessions that took place in a university conflict resolution center. Specifically, qualitative analytical methods are applied to five videotaped actual mediation sessions to (1) identify examples of the adversarial narrative pattern, pervasive in the literature, and (2) closely analyze the discourse in the cases where a different narrative pattern emerges to understand how these differing patterns are interactively co-constructed by the disputants and mediators. The literature in many fields contains research and theorizing on conflict, narrative, and numerous interaction variables in interpersonal conflict talk. However, the study of actual discourse within conflict events is relatively recent. Little empirical research explicates the situated communicative practices and mechanisms by which interlocutors interactively and emergently construct, resist, reproduce, and transform dispute narratives to produce outcomes consonant with their interests. This study applies microanalytic discourse analysis and narrative theory to examine how dispute narratives are interactively created in conflict talk episodes through work at the utterance level, including the manner in which narratives can be intertextually transformed through the interaction process. The findings herein illuminate the emergent nature of dispute narratives and some of the communicative practices and mechanisms disputants and mediators use to construct them. This study contributes to an understanding of the role of narratives in conflict talk and how narratives can be interactively constructed, co-constructed, challenged, and transformed in the course of a conflict talk event. / text

published_or_final_version / abstract / toc / Clinical Psychology / Master / Master of Social Sciences

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Hong Kong, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (leaf 80-89) Also available in print.

Thesis (Ph. D)--UCLA, 2008. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 177-189).

Thesis PlanA (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stout, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references.