Spelling suggestions: "subject:"irrigation -- northwest, pacific"" "subject:"irrigation -- northwest, acific""
1 |
Development of an expert system for irrigation and fertilization management in the Pacific NorthwestCao, Weidong 23 October 1992 (has links)
Recent advances in computer technology have made possible the
development of expert systems. Expert systems are computer programs that
perform at the level of a human expert. Expert systems can help integrate and
apply diverse sources of information and expertise to problems of integrated
crop management. A prototype Crop Management eXpert (CMX) system has
been developed. The primary goal of CMX is to provide recommendations on
optimal irrigation and fertilization scheduling for wheat production in the Pacific
Northwest. This system can be used by farmers and/or extension agents.
OUS II Shell has been used as a implementation tool. To build this rule - based
expert system, a development strategy, commonly used in the construction of
expert systems, consisting of 1 ) identification; 2) conceptualization; 3)
formalization; 4) implementation; and 5) testing was applied.
CMX is composed of modules for irrigation and fertilization management.
For irrigation management, CMX is mainly involved in the irrigation scheduling
which is the major part of irrigation management. Irrigation strategies have been
applied in irrigation decision making. For each strategy, timing criteria which
generally consist of management allowed depletion, soil water potential, leaf
water potential, and water stress indices have been used. The system provides
farmers with irrigation scenarios which determine when and how much water to
apply.
CMX represents an integration of conventional computing and expert
systems technology designed to provide expert recommendations enabling
farmers to obtain the best return on their water and fertilizer investment. For
fertilization management, a variety of variables have been taken into considered.
Crop growth stages, soil moisture, nutrient analysis, protein requirement, and
application methods are important factors for the fertilizer decision making.
Several constraints have been used in optimal fertilizer advice.
CMX can focus only on relevant information, thus reducing the problem
space to a manageable size and significantly, improving the efficiency of the
system. The facility of the expert system to explain the decision-making process
enables users to better understand the underlying assumptions, facts, and
reasoning used to generate recommendations. The CMX prototype
demonstrates the feasibility of employing expert systems technology in
agricultural applications.
CMX has been validated and evaluated. The survey results showed that
this prototype was successful in capturing domain experts' knowledge as rules
and providing advice on the irrigation and fertilization management for wheat. / Graduation date: 1993
|
2 |
Opportunity costs : irrigation vs. hydropowerRoss, Mark 25 May 1984 (has links)
In recent years we have seen increasing debate over
the allocation of PNW water resources. In particular there
are conflicts over using the river system for irrigation
vs. electricity production. Denying the hydroelectric
system water implies higher costs to electricity consumers
as producers substitute more expensive nonhydro resources.
This research looked at the impact of new irrigation
on PNW electricity consumers. This was done under varying
assumptions of demand response and farmer payments for
pumping of irrigation water. The study also examined the
difference between the current policy of allowing farmers
to take all the water they need, and a policy in which
withdrawals are limited in periods of low streamflow.
Simulations were run to determine the amount of
electricity production lost because of withdrawals. These
results were then used in a series of simulations to
estimate the economic impacts under the various assumptions
and policies.
It was found that irrigation caused losses to
electricity consumers. In some cases this loss was on the
order of $200/acre of irrigated land. The loss was
significantly mitigated under the interruptible policy.
Farmer payments for irrigation energy also reduced the loss
to consumers. / Graduation date: 1985
|
Page generated in 0.0764 seconds