The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court is a major landmark in the development of international accountability. Its preamble affirms “that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their effective prosecution must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing international cooperation”. Thus the signatory states were “determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prevention of such crimes”. The ICC contributes to the fight against impunity and the establishment of the rule of law by punishing violations of international legal norms. Accountability is important for the past and the future of societies. The ICC needs the support and cooperation of the states to effectively perform its mandate. So without ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute the ICC will not have jurisdiction over non-member states, unless referred by the UN Security Council. The Rome Statute does not only create the ICC but it also creates the national jurisdiction of its States Parties as these states have the primary responsibility to investigate and prosecute Rome Statute crimes. With only five Arab states to date being State Parties to the Rome Statute, it is obvious that the region is underrepresented at the ICC. Despite their positive role played in the creation of the ICC, not ratifying the Rome Statute raises several questions, especially that the majority of states that voted against the Statute were from the Arab region. Ratifying and implementing the Rome Statute will strengthen the Arab states criminal justice system, enabling them to prosecute international crimes domestically and will deter any individual from committing them in the future, regardless his official position. It will also allow the Arab states to have the primary jurisdiction over international crimes and reinforces the entire judicial system. This research will examine the issue of ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute by the Arab states by analysing the reasons, challenges and obstacles of the Arab states for not becoming part of the international criminal justice system.

L’assurance islamique, ou takaful, qui est apparue dans les années 1970, est un sujet d’actualité, tant en France qu’au Liban. Les sociétés d’assurance islamique voudraient opérer dans ces deux pays dont le droit des contrats, comme celui des entreprises sont dominés par l’idée de laïcité. Peut-on exercer une activité que se veut régie par des principes religieux dans des pays de droit positif laïc ? La police takaful est-elle une police d’assurance à l’instar de la police d’assurance conventionnelle ? Les sociétés takaful sont-elles des sociétés d’assurance au même titre que les sociétés d’assurance conventionnelle ? Certes, les éléments constituant le contrat d’assurance conventionnelle se retrouvent dans la police takaful, à savoir le risque, la prime et la prestation d’assurance. Ces deux contrats d’assurance couvrent les mêmes risques, sous réserve des objets et évènements considérés comme haram et prohibés par l’islam. Quant aux sociétés d’assurance takaful, elles peuvent prendre les mêmes formes que les sociétés d’assurance conventionnelle. Mais leur fonctionnement diffère de celles-ci, en raison de leur structuration en deux fonds distincts et d’un mode opérationnel qui leur est propre. Le contrôle de la conformité à la charia islamique marque les compagnies d’assurance takaful et les distingue fortement des sociétés d’assurance conventionnelle. Il s’agit sans doute du principal obstacle à leur réception par le droit positif. Mais il doit pouvoir être surmonté. / The Islamic insurance, or Takaful, that first appeared in the seventies, is a subject that has an actual importance both in France and Lebanon. The Islamic insurance companies aim at working in these two countries whereas the contracts law as much as the enterprises law is dominated by the idea of secularism. Can we practice an activity mainly ruled by religious principles in countries where the substantive law is secular? Is the Takaful policy an insurance policy like any other conventional policy insurance? And are the Takaful companies insurance companies at the same level of all other conventional insurance companies? Indeed, the elements that are the basics of the conventional insurance contract are found in the Takaful policy, meaning the risk, the premium and the insurance benefit. These two contracts cover the similar risks, except for the objects and events considered as Haram and prohibited by Islam. As for the insurance companies Takaful, they are allowed to have the same form as any other conventional insurance society. Yet, their functioning is different from the abovementioned, due to their structuring into two distinct funds in addition to an operational mode appropriate to their needs. The audit made in conformity with the Islamic sharia imprints the Takaful insurance companies and strongly distinguishes them from the conventional insurance companies. Without any doubt, the idea rotates around how the substantive law accepts them. However, the concept of Takaful should be overcome.