This study includes six dimensions: article¡¦s attributions, author¡¦s traits, the identities of censors, the opinions of censors, the results of judgment and the processes of publication; uses content analysis to describe the present editorial situation of Journal of Human Resource Management (JHRM) and constructs the regression model by the logistic regression using four dimensions except the results of judgment and the processes of publication. The findings indicate two sides, the first one is on the content analysis: it has a significant difference between the year of contribution and references, article¡¦s issue, total pages, number of authors, days from submission to acceptance, days from submission to publication; and different academic title also affect the article¡¦s research method. The second one is on the effect factor of the article is published or not: article¡¦s attributions and author¡¦s traits, including 16 variables, have no any effects on the acceptance of an article, but the identities of censors and the opinions of censors, including 8 variables, do have significant effects on it. The important factors to the article are the number of censors, the application of entirety, the innovation of deliverance and the completeness of viewpoint and as the order for influencing the acceptance of an article.