Spelling suggestions: "subject:"damming detection"" "subject:"amming detection""
1 |
Blind Channel Estimation Based On The Lloyd-max Algorithm Innarrowband Fading Channels And JammingDizdar, Onur 01 June 2011 (has links) (PDF)
In wireless communications, knowledge of the channel coefficients is required for coherent
demodulation. In this thesis, a blind channel estimation method based on the Lloyd-Max
algorithm is proposed for single-tap fading channels. The algorithm estimates the constellation
points for the received signal using an iterative least squares approach. The algorithm is
investigated for fast-frequency hopping systems with small block lengths and operating under
partial-band and partial-time jamming for both detecting the jammer and estimating the
channel. The performance of the Lloyd-Max channel estimation algorithm is compared to the
performance of pilot-based channel estimation algorithms which also use the least squares
approach and non-coherent demodulation and decoding.
|
2 |
<b>A Study on the Use of Unsupervised, Supervised, and Semi-supervised Modeling for Jamming Detection and Classification in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles</b>Margaux Camille Marie Catafort--Silva (18477354) 02 May 2024 (has links)
<p dir="ltr">In this work, first, unsupervised machine learning is proposed as a study for detecting and classifying jamming attacks targeting unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) operating at a 2.4 GHz band. Three scenarios are developed with a dataset of samples extracted from meticulous experimental routines using various unsupervised learning algorithms, namely K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), agglomerative clustering (AGG) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM). These routines characterize attack scenarios entailing barrage (BA), single- tone (ST), successive-pulse (SP), and protocol-aware (PA) jamming in three different settings. In the first setting, all extracted features from the original dataset are used (i.e., nine in total). In the second setting, Spearman correlation is implemented to reduce the number of these features. In the third setting, principal component analysis (PCA) is utilized to reduce the dimensionality of the dataset to minimize complexity. The metrics used to compare the algorithms are homogeneity, completeness, v-measure, adjusted mutual information (AMI) and adjusted rank index (ARI). The optimum model scored 1.00, 0.949, 0.791, 0.722, and 0.791, respectively, allowing the detection and classification of these four jamming types with an acceptable degree of confidence.</p><p dir="ltr">Second, following a different study, supervised learning (i.e., random forest modeling) is developed to achieve a binary classification to ensure accurate clustering of samples into two distinct classes: clean and jamming. Following this supervised-based classification, two-class and three-class unsupervised learning is implemented considering three of the four jamming types: BA, ST, and SP. In this initial step, the four aforementioned algorithms are used. This newly developed study is intended to facilitate the visualization of the performance of each algorithm, for example, AGG performs a homogeneity of 1.0, a completeness of 0.950, a V-measure of 0.713, an ARI of 0.557 and an AMI of 0.713, and GMM generates 1, 0.771, 0.645, 0.536 and 0.644, respectively. Lastly, to improve the classification of this study, semi-supervised learning is adopted instead of unsupervised learning considering the same algorithms and dataset. In this case, GMM achieves results of 1, 0.688, 0.688, 0.786 and 0.688 whereas DBSCAN achieves 0, 0.036, 0.028, 0.018, 0.028 for homogeneity, completeness, V-measure, ARI and AMI respectively. Overall, this unsupervised learning is approached as a method for jamming classification, addressing the challenge of identifying newly introduced samples.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.1029 seconds