Spelling suggestions: "subject:"judicial review"" "subject:"udicial review""
1 |
The limits to judicialization legislative politics and constitutional review in the Iberian democracies /Magalhâes, Pedro C., January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2003. / Title from first page of PDF file. Document formatted into pages; contains xvii, 398 p.: ill. Includes abstract and vita. Advisor: Richard Gunther, Dept. of Political Science. Includes bibliographical references (p. 364-398).
|
2 |
Richterliches Prüfungsrecht nach dem Rechte des Reichs und der wichtigeren Länder /Brackel, Bruno, January 1936 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Philipp-Universität zu Marburg.
|
3 |
Inwieweit ist der deutsche Richter berechtigt und verpflichtet, Gesetze und Verordnungen auf ihre Verfassungsmässigkeit hin zu prüfen? /Kahn, Julius. January 1907 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Giessen.
|
4 |
Artikel 48 der Reichsverfassung und das richterliche Nachprüfungsrecht /Ksoll, Eberhard. January 1928 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Breslau, 1928. / Bibliography: p. vii-viii.
|
5 |
The conflict over judicial powers in the United States to 1870Haines, Charles Grove, January 1909 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University. / Reproduction of original from Harvard Law School Library. Includes bibliographical references.
|
6 |
The distinct use and development of administrative law principles by the European Court of JusticeMakris, Maria C. January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
A reconsideration of constitutional review in the United Arab Emirates : 'a posteriori' or 'a priori' review?Al-Ghufli, Saeed M. A. O. January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Judicial review and the enforcement of human rights : the red and blue lights of the judiciary of GhanaAtupare, Peter Atudiwe 16 July 2008 (has links)
Constitutional democracy requires a constitutionalisation of Human Rights and the empowerment of judiciaries to enforce and protect such rights. In Ghana, these requirements have been put in place by the 1992 Constitution. Human Rights have been constitutionalised and the courts granted specific powers of Judicial Review to enforce the values of these rights by policing the actions of the legislature and the executive branches of Government. In response, the Judiciary has done a great deal through the power of Judicial Review to protect Human Rights in the country. It has developed a corpus of Human Rights jurisprudence which individuals and institutions can rely on for rights claims and protection. However, its role is not without blemish. This work seeks to discover the successes as well as the failures of the Judiciary of Ghana in enforcing Human Rights. As a theoretical prelude to the entire work, I claim that the main juridical basis to legitimate Judicial Review lies in the courts duty to enforce a higher body of law grounded in rights. On the basis of this claim, the work argues that while the Judiciary did play a constructive role in the promotion, enforcement and sustenance of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms in the country, it has not adopted a consistent approach in giving all Human Rights equal weight. A generous reception has been given to Civil and Political Rights, while Social-Economic Rights have not been sympathetically considered. This has generated a gap in Ghana’s Human Rights jurisprudence, and negated the values upheld by the postwar global Human Rights constituency - of which Ghana is a member. To avert the creation of Judicial determinism which will hold back the realisation of Socio-Economic Rights in Ghana, this work urges the Judiciary to accord equal respect to all Rights by adopting a purposive approach in deciding all rights claims. / Thesis (Master, Law) -- Queen's University, 2008-07-15 12:10:00.75
|
9 |
The availability of international judicial review of government act for breaches of human rightsadt@murdoch.edu.au, Arnold Laoh January 2002 (has links)
The main objective of this thesis is to provide description, analysis and criticism on
the existing international instruments for the promotion of respect and protection of
human rights, as well as a suggestion to the international community through the
United Nations mechanism to adopt an additional legal instrument as a
complementary procedure. This, in turn, should serve as an extra-pressure upon the
State governments to bring their internal legal system in the same line as the
international standards for the protection of human rights.
It is being argued in this work that the current international procedures available to
individual alleging their human rights have been abused by State are no longer
sufficient and therefore another procedure should be introduced and put into place.
The chapter "The Case of Indonesia" serves as a good (or bad?) example of State
abusive conduct and remain "untouchable" under international mechanisms.
Despite gross and systematic violations of human rights Indonesian government is
still immune due to executive-heavy legislation system, restricted judicial review as a
result of a corrupt judiciary and impunity of government and other public agencies.
The study fvstly concentrates on the procedures available at international level for
dealing with individual complaint alleging human rights violations. Different
procedures both under Charter and treaty provisions are analysed in the attempt to
describe their advantages and disadvantages. Two Charter-based procedures dealt
with in the discussion cover the communication procedure under the United Nations
Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) which includes the "1503" procedure.
Treaty-based procedures are given special attention in this thesis which include the
procedure before the Human Rights Committee (HRC), the Committee on the
Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the Committee against Torture
(CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
(CEDAW).
The discussion further presents a critical appraisal of those procedures in which the
limitations and weaknesses of the procedures are analysed followed by the suggestion
to adopt an additional procedure to complement the current mechanisms available
to individual seeking remedies for human rights violations. The limitations
of the procedures featured largely by the fact that the decisions resulted from those
procedures are legally non-binding. And this all what an individual can receive after
being allowed to bring hisher petition before the Committee. Before one is
permitted to communicate with one of the Committee hetshe must first meet all the
conditions of admissibility. The condition "exhaustion of all domestic remedies" can
virtually be seen as a hindrance for individual to communicate with the Committee.
Jn order to support this argument several decisions on several individual complaints
handed down by the HRC are presented in this study.
Finally, the study introduces a complementary procedure called International
Judicial Review by which the State Constitutions and legislation can be examined
whether or not they are in conformity with international human rights standards
and norms. If found inconsistent the Constitutions or legislation must be declared
invalid. The power to review is given to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as
the "principal judicial organ of The United Nations". And as a World Court the
decision made by the ICJ has legally binding power.
|
10 |
The availability of international judicial review of government breaches of human rights /Laoh, Arnold. January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Murdoch University, 2002. / Thesis submitted to the Division of Arts. Bibliography: p. [240]-269.
|
Page generated in 0.0522 seconds