• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • No language data
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Damage Tolerance of Unidirectional Basalt/Epoxy Composites In Co-Cured Aramid Sleeves

Allen, Devin Nelson 12 December 2011 (has links) (PDF)
Unidirectional basalt fiber rods consolidated with an aramid sleeve were measured for compression strength after impact at various energy levels and compared to undamaged control specimens. These structural elements represent local members of open three-dimensional composite lattice structures (e.g., based on isogrid or IsoTruss® technologies) that are continuously fabricated using advanced three-dimensional braiding techniques. The unidirectional core specimens, nominally 8 mm (5/16") and 11 mm (7/16") in diameter, were manufactured using bi-directional braided sleeves or unidirectional spiral sleeves with full or partial (approximately half) coverage of the core fibers. The 51 mm (2") specimens were shorter than the critical buckling length, ensuring the formation of kink bands, typical of strength-controlled compression failure of unidirectional composites. The test results indicate an approximate decrease in the average undamaged compression strength of approximately 1/3 and 2/3 when impacted with 5 J (3.7 ft-lbs) and 10 J (7.4 ft-lbs) for the 8 mm (5/16") diameter specimens and 10 J (7.4 ft-lbs.) and 20 J (14.8 ft-lbs.) for the 11 mm (7/16") diameter specimens, respectively. The aramid sleeves improved the damage tolerance of the composite members, with the amount of coverage having the greatest effect; full coverage exhibiting up to 45% greater strength than partial coverage. Braided sleeves improved compression strength after impact by up to 23% over spiral sleeves, but generally had little effect on damage tolerance. Larger diameter specimens tend to be more resistant to damage than those specimens of a smaller diameter. The compressive material properties for undamaged basalt composites are also presented with the average compressive strength being 800 MPa (116 ksi).
2

Damage Tolerance of Buckling-Critical Unidirectional Carbon, Glass,and Basalt Fiber Composites in Co-Cured Aramid Sleeves

Embley, Michael D. 12 December 2011 (has links) (PDF)
Compression strength after impact tests were conducted on unidirectional composite rods with sleeves. These elements represent local members of open three-dimensional composite lattice structures (e.g., based on isogrid or IsoTruss® technologies). The unidirectional cores composed of carbon, glass, or basalt fiber/epoxy composites were co-cured in aramid sleeves. Sleeve patterns included both bi-directional (unsymmetric) braids and unidirectional spiral wraps with sleeve coverage ranging from nominally half to full. The diameters were nominally 8 and 11 mm (5/16 and 7/16 in). The larger diameter had nominally twice the cross-sectional area, to quantify the effects of scaling. The specimens were long enough to encourage local buckling failure as expected in members of typical composite lattice structures. The unsupported lengths varied from 127 mm (5.0 in) to 160 mm (6.3 in). Specimens were radially impacted at mid-length with energy levels ranging from 0 to 20 J (0 to 14.8 ft-lbs) and tested in longitudinal compression to quantify the effects of local impact damage on the buckling strength. In undamaged specimens, sleeve type and sleeve coverage have no effect on the ultimate compression strength of carbon, glass, or basalt composites (7% or less standard deviation for each material). When impacted, the influence of sleeve type and sleeve coverage varies with the type of fiber in the unidirectional core. Sleeve type and coverage did not affect the compression strength after impact for fiberglass composites. On the other hand, both carbon and basalt composites exhibited improved performance with braided (vs. spiral) sleeves (up to 34% stronger) and full (vs. half) coverage (up to 38% stronger). The compression strength of carbon configurations decreases with increasing impact energy regardless of sleeve type or coverage. The higher flexibility of glass and basalt composites, however, allowed some configurations to maintain the same compression strength after impact as their undamaged counterparts, at lower impact energy levels. Doubling cross-sectional area of basalt composites significantly improves the stiffness and compression strength after impact, more than doubling the impact energy required to achieve the same compression strength.

Page generated in 0.0312 seconds