published_or_final_version / Music / Master / Master of Philosophy

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Oxford, 1988. / Includes bibliographical references (v. 2., leaves [243]-270).

Thesis supervisor: Christine S. Getz. Includes bibliographical references (p. 105-111).

Dissertation (D.M.A.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2009. / Directed by Andrew Willis; submitted to the School of Music. Title from PDF t.p. (viewed May 6, 2010). Includes bibliographical references (p. 54).

Thesis (M. Phil.)--University of Hong Kong, 1988.

No description available.

For keyboardists, touch is a paradox. It refers to the physical actions that constitute performance, yet to be “touched” by music is also to consider the immaterial relationship between performance and our psychology. In this dissertation, Touch and Modernity in French Keyboard Pedagogy, 1715–1915, I explore this dual notion of touch, deciphering how performers, teachers, analysts, and critics described the keyboard as a unique interface between body and mind. I track the notion of touch through an undertheorized corpus of instruction manuals for harpsichordists and pianists written in France between 1715 and 1915. The authors of these manuals outline several strikingly flexible theories of touch, described as some combination of action, sense, and metaphor. They use touch to construe the keyboardist as a modern ideal, dedicating their pedagogical programs to “newness,” configured to varying degrees as edification through rationalization, social development through institution building and urbanization, industrialization, culminating in the themes of alienation and solipsism. The musicians who wrote and used these manuals found unlikely interlocutors across a diverse field of thinkers. These interlocutors included philosophers and encyclopedists, bureaucrats, technologists, anthropologists, anatomists, psychologists, and others. Venturing explanations for the body’s relationship to sensory impressions, aesthetic judgments, and knowledge acquisition, these figures joined music pedagogues, using the keyboard and its various iterations—from instruments to telegraphs and typewriters—as a grounding object for touch. They delineated the stakes of an array of ideologies, positing an artistic, intuitive, discerning, or efficient touch as a benchmark by which to calibrate their modern subject, idealized as inhabiting an interface between historicity and progress. Their definitions for touch shuttle between public and private spheres, the exterior world and the interior psyche, the self and the other. This dissertation’s methodology treats four broad topics as lenses through which we discern modern modes of theorizing, deriving, and disseminating knowledge through touch. These include sensibility, or the condition for subjective knowledge; empiricism, or knowledge by way of experience; physiology, or knowledge acquisition through study of the interaction between mind and body; and psychology, or the potential for variable knowledge based on perception and attention. I argue that, animated by the aforementioned topics, touch enacts a dialectic of musical “work”—connoting preparatory labor, polished performance, and an object for contemplation and analysis—through which keyboardists came to represent modern subjectivity more broadly, the concept for which concretized over the course of the Enlightenment and Romantic eras. Touch thus affords a unique framework which we may use to study historical definitions of selfhood, denoting the materials, practices, and ethics of experiencing our bodies and articulating our relationship to culture and society.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 1994. / Includes tables. Typescript; issued also on microfilm. Sponsor: Harold F. Abeles. Dissertation Committee: Lenore M. Pogonowski. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 89-104).

Treatise (D.M.A.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2003. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references. Available also from UMI.

胡麥爾(1778-1837)是一位奧地利鋼琴家、作曲家、教師及指揮家，生前與貝 多芬齊名，被譽爲是當時歐洲最重要的鋼琴作曲家之一。可是近代的學者和聽眾對他的評價甚低，認爲他的音樂作品守舊、媚俗、不能登大雅之堂。 / 本文借鑒胡麥爾創作時期的文化背景，重新評價這位被忽視的音樂家對於開 發十九世紀鋼琴音樂所作出的貢獻。十八世紀後期中產階級的興起令音樂會 不斷增加，鋼琴演奏家不但成爲音樂會中的主要角色，而且他們所演奏的 「流行音樂」對於後世鋼琴技巧及音樂創作的發展，有舉足輕重的影響。 / 胡麥爾的鋼琴作品顯露出嶄新的作曲手法，當中包括較自由的轉調和曲式結 構，以及特別的音形法等，均源自音樂會中常出現的即興演奏，亦即「幻想 曲風格」。胡麥爾在正統器樂體裁的語境中引入幻想曲的技法，展示出流行 曲風格與正統音樂的結合，並開創了混合體裁的先河。其中，幻想曲與奏鳴 曲的混合體裁，對於後世的浪漫派作曲家如簫邦和舒曼等的創作模式尤有啓發。 / Johann Nepomuk Hummel (1778-1837) was an Austrian pianist, composer,teacher, and conductor who was described in his time as one of Europe's greatestpianist-composers. However, his music has been neglected and underestimated inmodem times, and is not considered to have any lasting influence on later compositional developments in the 19th century. / The present study aims to demonstrate that, though identified as a conservative composer, Hummel played an important transitional role in the evolution between Classical and Romantic styles. I argue that the post-classicalpianism that he cultivated presaged many significant stylistic trends of later composers, and that these were stimulated by the rise of public concerts. The demand for virtuosic performances by middle-class concert audiences led pianistcomposers like Hummel to explore new modes of improvisation, which in turn had a profound impact not only on keyboard technique, but also on compositional practice. / A comprehensive study of Hummel's piano music reveals a new compositional practice featuring juxtaposition of different figurations, freedom of modulation, and new formal structures. The fantasy style derived from concert 11 improvisations came to be incorporated in different keyboard genres, resulting in generic mixture. In particular, the hybrid fantasy-sonata foreshadowed the later practice of Schumann and Chopin, and contributed towards the merging of serious and popular styles in Romantic piano music. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Kam, Cheok Weng. / "December 2011." / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 160-174). / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstract also in Chinese. / List of Figures --- p.vii / List of Music Examples --- p.ix / Chapter Chapter One --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter Chapter Two --- Cultural Contexts for Hummel's Post-Classical Keyboard Style / The Rise of Public Concerts --- p.10 / The Development of Piano Music --- p.11 / Technical Innovations in Post-Classical Pianism --- p.12 / The Viennese Piano Style --- p.17 / The English Piano Style --- p.21 / Hummel's Keyboard Writing: Viennese Features --- p.28 / The Influence of the English Style --- p.31 / Legato Touch and the Chopin Style --- p.36 / Technical Innovations --- p.40 / Chapter Chapter Three --- Generic Transformation in Hummel's Piano Sonatas --- p.48 / The Keyboard Sonata in Hummel' s Time --- p.51 / Changing Approaches to Sonata Form --- p.56 / Hummel's Early Piano Sonatas --- p.61 / Sonata in F minor, Op. 20 --- p.67 / Sonata in C major, Op. 38 --- p.77 / Sonata in F-sharp minor, Op. 81 --- p.82 / Sonata in D major, Op. 106 --- p.93 / Chapter Chapter 4 --- The Evolution of Fantasias and Generic Innovations --- p.107 / Improvisation and Fantasy Style in the Eighteenth Century --- p.108 / The Eighteenth-Century Free Fantasia --- p.111 / Changing Conceptions of the Fantasy From C.P.E. Bach to Mozart --- p.118 / Changing Role of Improvisation in Performance Practice --- p.124 / From Harmonic Thinking to Thematic Thinking --- p.129 / Hurnmel's Fantasy Op. 18: The Fantasy-Sonata Hybrid --- p.134 / Chapter Chapter 5 --- Other Types of Generic Mixture Prompted by Fantasy Style --- p.141 / Generic Mixture with Theme and Variations --- p.142 / Caprices --- p.148 / Potpourri --- p.150 / Rondo --- p.152 / Chapter Chapter 6 --- Conclusion --- p.156 / Bibliography --- p.160