Ph.D. (Psychology) / In this study the illness behavior of people with a life threatening illness was described and the relationship between stress, affect and illness behavior investigated. An overview of the literature shows that the illness behavior patients exhibit is and should be an important consideration in the diagnosis of illness and treatment of patients. This is evident in reports of a high amount of ill people who do not receive treatment and the high amount of patients who seek treatment for minor ailments. It is further evident in the light of findings that illness behavior does not always accurately represent the physical disfunction and that it may even be present in :t- the absence of a physical disfunction. The paucity of research on the illness behavior of specific patient groups, and of information on the relative effects of physical versus psychological factors on illness behavior, indicate a void in the literature. The present study investigates this relationship in a group of patients with a life threatening illness. In the first phase of the study 15 kidney transplant patients were compared to themselves, under normal conditions and conditions of stress, regarding affect, the experiencing of stress and the reporting of physical symptoms. In the second phase of the study 15 kidney transplant patients were compared to 15 patients with acute but minor ailments regarding the reporting of physical symptoms, affect, the experiencing of stress and the psychosocial impact of the illness.

published_or_final_version / Nursing Studies / Master / Master of Nursing in Advanced Practice

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Health Sciences in Clinical Technology, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2017. / Introduction The prevalence of infertility is increasing at an alarming rate globally. Many couples are afflicted with infertility due to an array of diseases, trauma and psychological stresses. Renal disease is one such pathophysiological condition which is increasing amongst the younger age group. Often the progression of chronic renal disease leads to end stage renal failure that requires a renal transplantation. Post renal transplant, immunosuppressive agents are routinely prescribed to prevent allograft rejection. Immunosuppressive agents are potent drugs that can have deleterious side effects on semen parameters. However, the effects of the immunosuppressive agents on semen parameters in the literature are unclear and require further investigation. It is, therefore, important to assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents on semen, especially the three vital aspects of sperm concentration, motility and morphology which form the basis of male reproduction. Aims and Objectives of study This was a prospective observational study evaluating the effects of different immunosuppressive regimens on sperm parameters in post renal transplant male patients. The main aspects of semen parameters such as sperm concentration, motility and morphology that determine reproductive potential were assessed in the study patients and compared to the gold standard of semen analysis according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) reference values. Methodology Thirty-four renal transplant patients were recruited from the databases of both private nephrologists in the greater Durban area and the academic renal unit at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital. Following bioethical approval and informed consent, patients were required to produce a semen sample by masturbation. A questionnaire documenting the patient’s lifestyle, aetiology of renal disease, transplant date and immunosuppressive duration and regimen were recorded. The semen samples were analysed comprehensively according to the protocol on semen analysis recommended by the WHO. This included the macroscopic investigation (volume, appearance, colour, viscosity, liquefaction time and pH) and microscopic evaluation (sperm concentration, total motility, morphology, IgG/IgA and vitality). Sperm concentration, total motility, morphology and vitality were examined and recorded in duplicate to strengthen the validity of the results. A biostatistician analysed the data and determined the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics determined values of semen parameters in renal transplanted males and in each race demographic. The one sample t-test analysed the statistical significance between the mean study values and the WHO reference values. The effect of the immunosuppressive agent on semen parameters was determined using multiple linear regressions whilst ROC analysis determined the sensitivity and specificity of sperm concentration, total motility and morphology in predicting pregnancy from the patients that fathered children post renal transplant. Results The mean sperm concentration and morphology in the study patients were 14.0 mill/ml (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 10.2 – 17.7) and 3.3% (95% CI 2.7 – 3.9), respectively. Although values obtained were minimally lower than the WHO reference values, these results were within the 95% CI of the WHO guidelines. Motility evaluation revealed higher values of 43.2% (95% CI 36.6 – 49.7). In contrast, sperm vitality was considerably decreased, 47.5% (95% CI 40.6 – 54.4). All semen parameters exhibited no statistical significance (one sample t-test) when analysed against the WHO reference values except for sperm morphology, (p = 0.025; p< 0.05) which showed decreased morphology irrespective of immunosuppressive regimen. Semen volume 1.7 ml (95% CI 1.3 – 2.0) and pH 7.7 (95% CI 7.6 – 7.9) were both within the WHO guidelines. Descriptive statistics according to racial demographics showed no differences in semen values. An almost perfect linear relationship existed between total sperm motility and vitality (r = 0.967). Multiple linear regressions of duration and dosages of immunosuppressive drugs tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, could not predict the effect of the immunosuppressive agents on sperm concentration, total motility and morphology. There was a significant difference in morphology between those with and without children post renal transplant. Those with children post renal transplant exhibited a higher morphology value, (p = 0.001; p< 0.05). Sensitivity and specificity analysis of the patients with children post renal transplant concluded that morphology is the most optimal indicator and predictor of pregnancy (AUC = 0.854). Tacrolimus was the common immunosuppressive agent used in the four patients that fathered children. This was more evident in patients that underwent therapy with Sirolimus followed by Cyclosporin A (CsA) and changed to Tacrolimus as the last immunosuppressive agent used for maintenance therapy. Conclusion The ability to procreate in renal transplanted males has become increasingly difficult and emotionally challenging. In this study sperm concentration and morphology of renal transplanted males exhibited parameters similar to the general fertile population. Total motility possessed a higher range of values in contrast to sperm vitality which showed a significant decrease from the WHO reference values. The effect of immunosuppressive treatment on semen parameters could not be clearly defined due to the number of immunosuppressive regimens that patients were subjected to intermittently resulting in small sample sizes within each immunosuppressive regimen grouping. The majority of patients underwent a triple maintenance therapy of tacrolimus, MMF and prednisone. The dosage and duration of these tacrolimus and MMF was inconclusive in determining a beneficial or detrimental relationship on semen parameters. Morphology was shown to be the most significant indicator in predicting pregnancy in patients that fathered children. Tacrolimus was a common immunosuppressive agent used in the majority of patients that fathered children. It may have protective effects on sperm parameters as shown in patients that fathered children. This was a study with a small sample size and further investigations are required in a larger cohort of patients to assess individualized effects of the different immunosuppressive agents on sperm parameters. / M

The use of quality-of-life as an outcome measure provides detailed information about the effectiveness of medical treatments than morbidity or mortality rates alone. The use of quality-of-life data in the clinical setting can inform patients regarding treatment options, treatment benefits and costs. In competing health care markets, outcome measurement is regarded as important as it is concerned with the impact of health care practice and affects health policy decisions. Doessel (1978) conducted the first Australian study on the cost-effectiveness analysis of renal replacement therapies. The study was based on Klarman, Francis & Rosenthal's (1968) the study, where the output was measured in terms of the number of life years gained from kidney transplantation, and a twenty-five percent weight was allocated in an attempt to capture quality-of-life from kidney transplantation. Doessel (1978) used two sources of data: Australian data (Disney 1974) and European data (Gurland et al. 1973; Shiel et al. 1974). The study measured life years gained, and agreed with the Klarman et al. (1974) findings that transplantation is the most effective way to increase life expectancy of persons with chronic renal disease (Butler & Doessel 1989). The outputs of the alternative treatments were not reported in monetary terms; the study focused on life years gained as the output measure. Hence the importance of this current study, which includes a cost-effectiveness analysis for cadaver liver, and living kidney transplantation for end-stage liver and kidney disease patients. Calls to respect patient autonomy and to produce patient-centered outcomes have recently brought the patient’s point of view back into the center of clinical medicine (Sullivan 2003). Survival rates indicate one measure of outcome however they do not reflect patients’ perceptions of health benefit or experiences. Noting that patients’ psychosocial effect on functioning is of more concern to them than their physical Thesis Preamble iii ability, that more accurate knowledge of patients’ conditions be measured prior to transplantation (Tarter et al. 1991). Recently researchers advocated investigating transplant patients' states of health to assess the social benefit of these expensive health care services from their perspective (Joralemon & Fujinaga 1997). The current study's mixed method, bridges the gaps in treatment outcome measurements, as the mixed method applied (Creswell 1994; Sim & Sharp 1998) prospectively measured quality-oflife, determined health utility, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The study reported the living donors experience of the donation process, described their needs; expressed using a new psychosocial model supporting future living kidney donor's during the donation process.