Tyrimo objektas: 1) Žemaitijos ūkininkų ūkiai, užsiimantys pieno gamyba verslo pagrindais ir vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo pasekoje sustiprinę savo konkurencines jėgas pieno pardavimų/supirkimų grandyje; 2) Žemės ūkio kooperatinė bendrovė „Pieno gėlė“, kaip vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo sėkmingas pavyzdys. Darbo tikslas: Parengti pienininkystės ūkių vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos sėkmingo kooperuoto įgyvendinimo veiksnių loginę schemą. Uždaviniai: 1. Išnagrinėti vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos taikymo agrariniame sektoriuje teorinius aspektus; 2. Sukurti vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo tyrimo metodiką; 3. Atlikti pienininkystės ūkių vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo analizę; 4. Identifikuoti vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo sėkmės veiksnius. Tyrimo metodai: mokslinės literatūros analizė ir sintezė, atvejo analizė, anketinė apklausa. Tyrimo rezultatai: Išnagrinėtos vertikalios integracijos ir vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos teorinės sąmpratos. Nustatyti vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos taikymo ir įgyvendinimo agrariniame sektoriuje ypatumai. Atskleistos vertikaliosios integracijos ir kooperacijos plėtros sąsajos agrariniame sektoriuje. Taikant sudarytą metodiką, atlikta Žemaitijos ūkininkų ūkių vertikaliosios integracijos strategijos kooperuoto įgyvendinimo, dalyvaujant ŽŪKB „Pieno... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / Object: 1)Samogitian family farms involved in milk production business, who have strengthened their competitiveness in milk selling/buying chain as a result of cooperative implementing of vertical integration strategy; 2) Agricultural cooperative company "Pieno gėlė" as a successful example of cooperative implementation of vertical integration strategy. Aim: to develop a logical scheme of successful cooperated implementation of vertical integration strategy for dairy farms. Objectives: 1st. To analyze the theoretical aspects of the vertical integration strategy application in agrarian sector. 2nd. To create a research methodology for cooperate implementation of vertical integration strategy. 3rd. To perform analysis of cooperate implementation of vertical integration strategy in dairy farms. 4th. To identify success factors of cooperate implementation of vertical integration strategy. Research methods: analysis and synthesis of scientific literature and case studies, a survey. Research results: Theoretical concepts of vertical integration and vertical integration strategy are analyzed. The pecularities of vertical integration strategy implementation and application in the agrarian sector are established. The connection of vertical integration and cooperation development in the agrarian sector is revealed. Using the developed methodology, analysis of cooperated implementation of vertical integration strategy of Samogitian family farms by participating in ACC "Pieno gėlė"... [to full text]

<p>Agrarna politika vlasti u periodu od 1945-1950. godine je<br />shodno ideolo&scaron;kim određenjima, bila usmerena na promenu<br />dru&scaron;tvenih odnosa na selu. Međutim, osim ideolo&scaron;kih<br />razloga ne treba zanemariti činjenicu da je usitnjen zemlji&scaron;ni<br />posed već ispoljio mnoge slabosti i da su u uslovima<br />uvećane potražnje za poljoprivrednim proizvodima ti problemi<br />dodatno ubedili vlast u neophodnost koncentracije<br />zemlje i formiranja krupnih, pre svega, zadružnih gazdinstava.<br />U cilju realizacije tog cilja, primenjene su rigidne<br />ekonomske i političke mere, naročito na prostoru Vojvodine<br />među kojima je bilo i brutalnih metoda izrazito oprečnih<br />tradicionalnim vrednostima i etičkom kodeksu očuvanom u<br />seoskim sredinama. Ovakva agrarna politika izazvala je<br />veliko nezadovoljstvo selja&scaron;tva i veliki pad poljoprivredne<br />proizvodnje. Razni vidovi opstrukcije velikog dela stanovni&scaron;tva<br />prema državi i strah od gladi u jeku sukoba sa SSSRom,<br />ubedili su partijsko rukovodstvo zemlje u neophodnost<br />promene dotada&scaron;njeg odnosa prema poljoprivredi i selja&scaron;tvu.<br />Mada se nije lako odustajalo od politike kolektivizacije, gore<br />navedeni razlozi doveli su do njenog napu&scaron;tanja već<br />1950. godine, a zadružni sistem od 1953. godine transformisan<br />je u ekonomski racionalnije organizacije. Ove promene,<br />nisu značile i kraj primene revolucionarnih mera na<br />selu. One su posebno nagla&scaron;ene 1953. godine ograničenjem<br />privatnog poseda na 10 hektara po domaćinstvu.<br />Ipak, agrarna politika KPJ od tada se razvija na principima<br />većeg uvažavanja selja&scaron;tva i uspostavljanja ekonomske<br />saradnje sa privatnim posedom. Novu politiku karakteri&scaron;e<br />dobrovoljnost kooperacije i značajnije ulaganje u prerađivačku<br />industriju i poljoprivredu proizvodnju.</p> / <p>Agrarian policy of the Government in the period from 1945<br />to 1950, according to ideological determinations, was<br />pointed to the changes of social relations in a village. However,<br />beside ideological reasons, it should not be neglected<br />the fact that fragmented land property had already shown<br />many weaknesses and that in the circumstances of higher<br />requests for agricultural products, those issues persuaded<br />the Government in the necessity of gathering land and<br />forming large collective economies. In order to realize that<br />goal, rigid economic and political measures were taken,<br />especially in the territory of Vojvodina, some of them very<br />brutal, totally opposite to traditional values and ethical codex<br />preserved in rural areas. This agrarian policy caused<br />great discontent among peasantry and huge decline of agricultural<br />production. Different ways of obstruction by people<br />towards the state and the fear of hunger in the middle<br />of the conflict with Soviet Union (USSR), persuaded the<br />Party leader-ship of the State in the necessity of changing<br />the relation towards agriculture and peasantry.<br />Even though it was not easy to give up the policy of collectivization,<br />reasons mentioned above brought to it&#39;s abandonment<br />in 1950, and collective economy sys-tem was<br />transformed in 1953 into economically more rational organizations.<br />Those changes did not led to the end of use<br />revolutionary measures in a village. They were even emphasized<br />in 1953 by limiting the private properties to 10<br />hectares per house-holds. However, agrarian policy since<br />that period was developing on the principles of higher respect<br />of the peasantry and establishing cooperation with<br />private property. New policy was characterized by willingly<br />cooperation and significant investment in manufacturing<br />industry and agrarian production.</p>