Une des questions fondamentales en neurobiologie du développement est de comprendre quels sont les mécanismes responsables de la formation des circuits neuronaux. Alors que les circuits de neurones projecteurs ont fait l'objet d'études intensives, aujourd'hui encore peu de chose est connu sur les molécules et les voies de signalisation impliquées dans la croissance et la différentiation axonale des interneurones GABA. Au cours de ma thèse, j'ai étudié le rôle de la molécule de guidage axonal Semaphorine 3a (Sema3A) dans le développement des axones des interneurones GABA du cervelet. Pour mener à bien cette étude, j'ai développé de nouvelles approches expérimentales in vitro et in vivo. En utilisant ces nouveaux outils, j'ai montré que la SEMA3A était capable d'attirer l'axone des interneurones GABA. In vitro, la SEMA3A induit une augmentation locale de la formation de branches axonales et l'apparition précoce d'un marqueur présynaptique (GAD65). Nous avons également montré que la combinaison d'expression de SEMA3A avec une molécule d'adhésion de la famille L1CAM dans les cellules hétérologues était capable d'induire l'innervation de cette cellule de manière spécifique par les interneurones GABA du cervelet. Cette étude nous a permis de montrer que la combinaison entre une molécule de guidage axonal et une molécule d'adhésion cellulaire spécifique était suffisante pour induire des mécanismes de reconnaissance cellulaire par les interneurones GABA du cervelet. / GABAergic interneurons are fundamental component in neural processing and their specific innervation patterns are though to be the building block for physiological brain function and computing. However the molecular and cellular mechanisms that assemble inhibitory local circuits remain largely unknown. In cerebellar cortex, molecular layer GABAergic interneurons are key regulators of cerebellar signal coding and memory formation by sending specifically their axons to innervate the Purkinje cells. Here, we show that a combination of both secreted axon guidance and recognition molecules of L1CAM family is sufficient to trigger target cell recognition by molecular layer GABAergic interneuron˙s in vivo. Using BAC transgenic reporter mice for cell-type specific gene-expression profiling of secreted SEMAPHORIN molecules, we identified that SEMAPHORIN3A (SEMA3A) expression picked precisely at relevant time-point of GABAergic local circuit formati on. In vitro, in a co-culture model, we found that semaphorin3A (SEMA3A) secreted by CHO cells attracts GABAergic interneurons axons and triggers their local specific branching. In vivo, the injection of these heterologous cells expressing SEMA3A ectopically in the granule cell layer is able to disrupt the « crystal »like organization of molecular GABAergic interneurons and attracts their axons in this ectopic territory. Moreover we found that both in vitro and in vivo, the co-expression of SEMA3A and the L1CAM family recognition molécules, Neurofascin, but not their respective expression alone, are able to induced heterologous cells innervation by molecular GABAergic interneurons. These results suggest that specific combination between axon guidance molecules and L1CAM family is sufficient to specify cell type recognition in a space and timely dependent manner.

<p>L1 syndrome is an X-linked recessive disorder, characterised by congenital hydrocephalus, adducted thumbs, spastic paraplegia, agenesis of the corpus callosum and mental retardation. The disease is caused by mutations in the L1CAM gene, encoding a protein predominantly expressed in the nervous system. This protein has been implicated in a variety of processes including neuronal migration, neurite outgrowth and fasciculation, myelination, and long-term memory formation.</p><p>L1 syndrome was suspected at genetic counselling of a family with a boy suffering from congenital hydrocephalus and mental retardation. Complete sequencing of L1CAM, performed by an external laboratory, revealed a novel mutation in the family, including a boy, affected with L1 syndrome, his sister, his mother and his maternal grandmother.</p><p>To verify this mutation and to be able to detect mutations in the L1CAM gene locally in the future, a method for mutational analysis of this gene was set up using PCR optimisation and cycle sequencing.</p><p>Sequencing of L1CAM was then performed on DNA samples from the four family members and the mutation was verified. A point mutation (c.3458-1G>C) in the 5’ splice site of exon 26 was detected in all of them. This new, not previously described, mutation is supposed to cause a deletion of the 26th exon and a frameshift in the part of the protein encoded by exons 27 and 28. This means that almost the entire cytoplasmic domain of the protein would have a loss of function, explaining the symptoms affecting the boy.</p>

L1 syndrome is an X-linked recessive disorder, characterised by congenital hydrocephalus, adducted thumbs, spastic paraplegia, agenesis of the corpus callosum and mental retardation. The disease is caused by mutations in the L1CAM gene, encoding a protein predominantly expressed in the nervous system. This protein has been implicated in a variety of processes including neuronal migration, neurite outgrowth and fasciculation, myelination, and long-term memory formation. L1 syndrome was suspected at genetic counselling of a family with a boy suffering from congenital hydrocephalus and mental retardation. Complete sequencing of L1CAM, performed by an external laboratory, revealed a novel mutation in the family, including a boy, affected with L1 syndrome, his sister, his mother and his maternal grandmother. To verify this mutation and to be able to detect mutations in the L1CAM gene locally in the future, a method for mutational analysis of this gene was set up using PCR optimisation and cycle sequencing. Sequencing of L1CAM was then performed on DNA samples from the four family members and the mutation was verified. A point mutation (c.3458-1G&gt;C) in the 5’ splice site of exon 26 was detected in all of them. This new, not previously described, mutation is supposed to cause a deletion of the 26th exon and a frameshift in the part of the protein encoded by exons 27 and 28. This means that almost the entire cytoplasmic domain of the protein would have a loss of function, explaining the symptoms affecting the boy.