<p> At a time when state standards and assessments drive educational policy and literacy is defined as print-based, students who don&rsquo;t meet external benchmarks for developing skills along what is considered to be a &ldquo;normal trajectory&rdquo; are often seen as &ldquo;at-risk&rdquo; or diagnosed with learning disabilities. While there may be real variations in the ways that individuals learn, schools have a responsibility to offer a variety of pedagogical approaches in order to meet the needs of all children within an inclusive setting. This practitioner research dissertation seeks to better understand the ways that students identified as having learning disabilities create and communicate using a variety of modes including narrative writing, dance, and digital composition. Using qualitative data collected over the course of a school year while teaching full-time at an urban school with a folk arts focus, the author looks closely at the multimodal writing practices of four Black middle school girls identified as having learning disabilities. Drawing upon a theoretical framework rooted in Disability Studies/ Critical Race Theory (DisCrit) and New Literacy Studies, this study investigates the ways that students use multimodal composition to construct identities as able learners, thereby challenging deficit orientations at the intersection of race, gender and ability. By examining the artifacts that these students created over the course of an academic year as well as their reflections, and by extending a definition of literacy to include multimodal representations of knowledge, the relationships between curriculum and identity are explored. Findings reveal a complex interplay between multimodal composition and collaboration, and suggest that curriculum embedded with multiple modes for representing knowledge can create pathways to culturally relevant and inclusive pedagogy, and contribute to the construction of powerful writing identities.</p>

Students who fail to establish an identity as a reader run the risk of becoming disconnected from both school and society due to the important position reading holds in our culture. Therefore it is crucial to determine how classroom teachers can help marginal readers increase their participation in the classroom learning community. Three major research questions guide the study: (1) Do participating teachers conceptualize reading as encompassing a broad or a narrow range of behaviors? (2) How do teachers' theories about reading development, reading instruction, and learning potential impact upon their interactions with slowly developing readers? (3) How do curriculum, instructional groups, and classmates influence efforts to help slowly developing readers increase their participation in the literate classroom community? The study employs qualitative research methods. It describes the theory and practice of two first grade teachers recognized for their commitment to helping marginal readers. Data collected over a four month period of time are drawn from participant observation, audiotaping of classroom reading events, and interviews/conversations with teachers, students, and parents. Data indicate that participating teachers conceptualize reading as encompassing an extremely broad range of behaviors. Teachers' theories of reading and learning stress motivation, self-confidence, support, challenge, and shared roles among teacher and students. The study concludes that teachers can help marginal readers increase their participation in the learning community through explicit language that reflects social and cognitive goals, support and challenge, and focus on students as resources to one another. It further concludes that slowly developing readers benefit from participation in the same language-rich environment as peers when teachers modify and extend learning experiences to meet individual needs. Ensuring success for all students involves careful analysis of existing practices to determine if teachers' theories about reading, learning, and student potential expand or limit classroom alternatives for students whose reading development differs from that of peers. Further, it requires examination of the role of classmates and family in promoting or hindering student progress. The challenge for educators is to explore ideas and practices that demonstrate promise for helping slowly developing readers reach high levels of competence.

The research and the study focus on the problem of dissociated learning. Why do students fail to connect with knowledge? The purposes of the study are: to summarize research pertaining to brain growth; to describe educational approaches and tactics consistent with this research; to test a brain research-based program designed to connect children to knowledge. The study rests on two research-based assumptions: strategies that connect dysfunctional or developmentally delayed students with thinking and learning will connect children in general with thinking and learning; educational activities integrating spatial information processing with linguistic processing will develop thinking skills more effectively than programs that do not. The apparent reason for the success of a spatial/linguistic program is that cross-modal activities mirror, or model, the integrated processes of the brain, impacting attention, emotion and logical operations. Increasing numbers of students fail to connect with writing. Many of these students can draw. Can drawing be used to connect these students to writing as thinking? The hypothesis is that a cross-modal activity combining drawing (a spatial activity) with writing (a linguistic activity) will develop descriptive, analytical and inferential thinking skills more effectively than a writing program that does not. The study targets children who receive special services, including those with language- and attention-related problems. To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experimental/control study was designed, involving 200 students in grades K, 3, 4, 5 and 6 in intact classrooms in two elementary schools. Approximately 2,000 pieces of data revealed a significant effect for the treatment, Drawing/Writing, on writing and thinking skills in the experimental group, including students who receive special services. The conclusions of the research are that brain research has relevance for education and that cross-modal activities provide antidotes to dissociated learning. The conclusion of the study is that, as a writing program, Drawing/Writing has broad usefulness and appeal.

Writing instruction that reflects the variety or represented pupil intelligences and learning styles in a special day classroom can significantly increase a child's opportunity for success. Attending to these areas while simultaneously taking into account student strengths, interests, and desires can facilitate the academic process. Written language skills and achievement must be addressed in a supportive and encouraging climate motivating children and maximizing their willingness to undertake new concepts.