The objective of this paper is to ascertain the principles of the economic thinking of José Yves Limantour, and the changes they underwent, to explain the process of transformation of econo- mic liberalism which, as will be seen, tended more toward state intervention; this, incidentally, can be considered as the basis of economic nationalism as developed by the post-revolutionary governments. It follows, then, that the study of Limantour and his economic thinking seeks to explain the transformation process to which the Mexican liberal state was subjected in thelast decade of the 19th century and the first decade of the 20th. The study is divided into two sections, the first of which explores the general characteristics of the liberal state and its transfor- mations from the 1850s through to the 1900s. The second analyses the spheres of the Mexican economy that constituted the main focuses of Limantour’s interventions and regulation. / El objetivo del presente ensayo es conocer los principios del pensamiento económico de José Yves Limantour así como sus modificaciones para dar cuenta del proceso de transformación del liberalismo económico que como se verá, tendió más hacia el intervencionismo estatal, el cual dicho sea de paso puede ser considerado como la base del nacionalismo económico desplegado por los gobiernos posrevolucionarios. De ahí pues que el estudio de Limantour y su pensamiento económico pretenda dar cuenta del proceso de transformación del Estado liberal mexicano en la última década del siglo XIX y primera del XX. El trabajo se encuentra dividido en dos apartados, en el primero se estudiarán las características generales del Estado liberal y sus transformaciones desde los años cincuenta del siglo XIX hasta la primera década del siglo XX. En el segundo se analizarán los principales ámbitos de la economía mexicana donde Limantour incurrió en una mayor regulación e intervención.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-03-29T12:28:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Leon Santiago Mendes Suhett.pdf: 1120014 bytes, checksum: 56768b4d1a17546dab7d4c7a8dbd1c1b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-29T12:28:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Leon Santiago Mendes Suhett.pdf: 1120014 bytes, checksum: 56768b4d1a17546dab7d4c7a8dbd1c1b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-20 / The present dissertation analyzes the evolution of the Latin American economic thought between the decades of the 1950s and 1970s. The starting point of the research takes the creation of the Economic Comission for Latin America (CEPAL) as its landmark in 1949. One considers its institutionalization led by Raúl Prebisch, as the opening process of a constructive authentic critical thought in the region. The theories developed by André Gunder Frank and Ruy Mauro Marini are analyzed within the scope of mesuring its advances as well as the shortcomings of these contributions. In this essay one approaches the main concepts and categories as given by each one of these authors. Therefore, by this token, one considers the André Gunder Frank theories as playing one intermediate role by providing elements for the rupture with the reformist trends of the CEPAL think tanks as well as establishing some pillars which will allow the construction of the Marxist Theory of Dependence / Esta dissertação analisa a evolução do pensamento econômico latino-americano entre as décadas de 1950 e 1970. O início da pesquisa possui como marco a criação da Comissão Econômica para América Latina, em 1949, pois entendemos que a institucionalização da Comissão, encabeçada por Raúl Prebisch, inaugura o processo de constituição de um pensamento crítico e autêntico na região. As obras de André Gunder Frank e Ruy Mauro Marini são analisadas sob o intuito de compreender os limites e avanços destas contribuições. Em nosso estudo, abordamos os aqui considerados principais conceitos e categorias ensejados por cada autor. Dessa maneira, imputamos à obra de André Gunder Frank um papel de intermediação, ao proporcionar elementos para o rompimento com os anseios reformistas dos intelectuais cepalinos e estabelecer alguns pilares que permitirão a construção da Teoria Marxista da Dependência