A competitividade de uma empresa é passível de ser construída em diferentes dimensões. Entre elas, está o modelo de gestão da produção. E, nesse sentido, destacam-se ferramentas do modelo lean. Esse modelo de produção tem sido o núcleo de numerosas iniciativas de melhoria contínua e referenciado como necessário para o aumento da competitividade das empresas. Contudo, ao considerarmos o universo das médias empresas e a implementação de um modelo de produção, realizado como um processo contínuo de melhoria, que permite estabelecer os objetivos e as capacidades da empresa, além de orientar à melhor utilização dos recursos, é pouco utilizado, e tais organizações se apresentam ineficientes na implementação de um modelo de produção que aumente sua competitividade. Partindo dessa proposição, uma empresa que adotou como modelo de gestão da produção o lean, deveria ter, também informação acerca dos benefícios das ferramentas implementadas, bem como o seu efeito sobre o desempenho produtivo. Nesse sentido, a proposta deste trabalho consiste em avaliar quais ferramentas do modelo lean foram implementadas em cinco médias empresas do segmento automotivo, em diferentes países, se houve benefícios para o processo produtivo em função da implementação e se as ferramentas foram implementadas baseadas em algum método estruturado ou não. / Submitted by Marcelo Teixeira (mvteixeira@ucs.br) on 2014-04-29T11:40:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Rubilar Toniazzo.pdf: 2713904 bytes, checksum: 503ebd1c9afeeaa97084a6d3d6c6636f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-04-29T11:40:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertacao Rubilar Toniazzo.pdf: 2713904 bytes, checksum: 503ebd1c9afeeaa97084a6d3d6c6636f (MD5) / The competitiveness of a company is liable to be built in different dimensions. Among them, the model of production management. And in this sense we highlight the model lean tools. This production model has been the core of numerous continuous improvement initiatives and referenced as needed to increase the competitiveness of companies. However, when considering the universe of medium enterprises and a implementation of a production model, performed as a continuous process of improvement, which allows us to establish the goals and capabilities of the company, besides guiding the best use of resources, it is rarely used and such organizations present inefficient implementation of a production model that increases their competitiveness. From this proposition, a company that has adopted as a model of lean production management, should have the information about the contribution of the tools implemented, as well as its effect on performance. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to assess which model lean tools were implemented in five medium-sized companies from the automotive sector, in different countries, there are benefits to the production process due to the implementation and tools have been implemented based on a structured method or not.

A competitividade de uma empresa é passível de ser construída em diferentes dimensões. Entre elas, está o modelo de gestão da produção. E, nesse sentido, destacam-se ferramentas do modelo lean. Esse modelo de produção tem sido o núcleo de numerosas iniciativas de melhoria contínua e referenciado como necessário para o aumento da competitividade das empresas. Contudo, ao considerarmos o universo das médias empresas e a implementação de um modelo de produção, realizado como um processo contínuo de melhoria, que permite estabelecer os objetivos e as capacidades da empresa, além de orientar à melhor utilização dos recursos, é pouco utilizado, e tais organizações se apresentam ineficientes na implementação de um modelo de produção que aumente sua competitividade. Partindo dessa proposição, uma empresa que adotou como modelo de gestão da produção o lean, deveria ter, também informação acerca dos benefícios das ferramentas implementadas, bem como o seu efeito sobre o desempenho produtivo. Nesse sentido, a proposta deste trabalho consiste em avaliar quais ferramentas do modelo lean foram implementadas em cinco médias empresas do segmento automotivo, em diferentes países, se houve benefícios para o processo produtivo em função da implementação e se as ferramentas foram implementadas baseadas em algum método estruturado ou não. / The competitiveness of a company is liable to be built in different dimensions. Among them, the model of production management. And in this sense we highlight the model lean tools. This production model has been the core of numerous continuous improvement initiatives and referenced as needed to increase the competitiveness of companies. However, when considering the universe of medium enterprises and a implementation of a production model, performed as a continuous process of improvement, which allows us to establish the goals and capabilities of the company, besides guiding the best use of resources, it is rarely used and such organizations present inefficient implementation of a production model that increases their competitiveness. From this proposition, a company that has adopted as a model of lean production management, should have the information about the contribution of the tools implemented, as well as its effect on performance. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to assess which model lean tools were implemented in five medium-sized companies from the automotive sector, in different countries, there are benefits to the production process due to the implementation and tools have been implemented based on a structured method or not.

This investigation proposes a lean model of production management for a small and micro enterprise (SME) dealing in packaging production in the auto parts sector, with the purpose of increasing efficiency in its production line. To this end, this model integrates study method tools and SMED, seeking to reduce waiting times and unnecessary operations, which have been identified as causing the problem on the basis of an initial diagnosis of the situation. Furthermore, to support and guarantee success in implementing these tools, John Kotter's Change Model is used. After two months of implementation, the results showed a 50% reduction in setup operation time and a 32% decrease in filing operation time, which are bottlenecks in the production process. Thus, with the new indicators, the line efficiency increased by 7% from the initial situation, thus showing improvement.

<p><em>Syfte:</em> Utvärdering av hur patienter upplever den förbokade återbesökstiden, väntetiden samt personalens bemötande vid återbesöket. Syftet är även att undersöka hur personal på ortopedens nyinrättade ”snabbmottagningen” vid AS upplever stress, patientflöde samt telefonförfrågningarna, efter införandet enligt Lean-modellen</p><p><strong></strong><em>Metod:</em> Deskriptiv kvantitativ enkätstudie. Slumpmässigt urval utfördes på patienter och av hundra procent (n=55) tillfrågade, deltog fyrtionio procent (n=27). Av hundra procent tillfrågad personal (n=14), deltog sextiofyra procent (n=9). Urvalet utförde avdelningschefen.</p><p><strong></strong><em>Resultat<strong>:</strong></em> Utvärderingen av patienternas upplevelser av planerad återbesökstid, bemötande och väntetid på snabbmottagningen var generellt mycket bra. Personal på ortopedmottagningens snabbmottagning upplevde ingen större förändring efter införandet enligt Lean-modellen.</p><p><strong></strong><em>Slutsats:</em> Resultatet visar att patienterna upplevde den planerade återbesökstiden generellt mycket bra. Personalens upplevde inte att arbetet förändrats. Fler och större studier behövs för att utvärdera organisationsförändringar som initierats av Lean-modellen.</p> / <p><em>Aim:</em> Evaluation of paitents’ experiences of the prebooked time for next appointment, the waiting time and the staff’s treatment at the next appointment. The aim is also to examine how the staff at the newly established orthopedic “quickreception” at the Uppsala University hospital experience stress, patientflow and the telephonerequests, after the introduction according to the Lean-model.</p><p><em>Method</em>: Descriptive quantitative inquirystudy. Patients were selected randomly and out of one hundred percent (n=55) who were asked, fortynine percent (n=27) participated. Out of one hundred percent (n=14) of the staff asked, sixtyfour percent (n=9) participated. The selection was made by the head of the ward.</p><p><em>Results</em>: Evaluation of the patients’ experiences of the planned time for next appointment, treatment and waiting time at the “quickreception” was generally very good. The staff at the orthopedic “quickreception” did not experience a big change after the introduction according to the Lean-model.</p><p><em>Conclusion:</em> The results show that the patients experienced the planned time for next appointment generally very good. The staff did not experience that the work had changed. More and larger studies are needed to evaluate changes of organisations that were initiated by the Lean-model.</p>

Syfte: Utvärdering av hur patienter upplever den förbokade återbesökstiden, väntetiden samt personalens bemötande vid återbesöket. Syftet är även att undersöka hur personal på ortopedens nyinrättade ”snabbmottagningen” vid AS upplever stress, patientflöde samt telefonförfrågningarna, efter införandet enligt Lean-modellen Metod: Deskriptiv kvantitativ enkätstudie. Slumpmässigt urval utfördes på patienter och av hundra procent (n=55) tillfrågade, deltog fyrtionio procent (n=27). Av hundra procent tillfrågad personal (n=14), deltog sextiofyra procent (n=9). Urvalet utförde avdelningschefen. Resultat: Utvärderingen av patienternas upplevelser av planerad återbesökstid, bemötande och väntetid på snabbmottagningen var generellt mycket bra. Personal på ortopedmottagningens snabbmottagning upplevde ingen större förändring efter införandet enligt Lean-modellen. Slutsats: Resultatet visar att patienterna upplevde den planerade återbesökstiden generellt mycket bra. Personalens upplevde inte att arbetet förändrats. Fler och större studier behövs för att utvärdera organisationsförändringar som initierats av Lean-modellen. / Aim: Evaluation of paitents’ experiences of the prebooked time for next appointment, the waiting time and the staff’s treatment at the next appointment. The aim is also to examine how the staff at the newly established orthopedic “quickreception” at the Uppsala University hospital experience stress, patientflow and the telephonerequests, after the introduction according to the Lean-model. Method: Descriptive quantitative inquirystudy. Patients were selected randomly and out of one hundred percent (n=55) who were asked, fortynine percent (n=27) participated. Out of one hundred percent (n=14) of the staff asked, sixtyfour percent (n=9) participated. The selection was made by the head of the ward. Results: Evaluation of the patients’ experiences of the planned time for next appointment, treatment and waiting time at the “quickreception” was generally very good. The staff at the orthopedic “quickreception” did not experience a big change after the introduction according to the Lean-model. Conclusion: The results show that the patients experienced the planned time for next appointment generally very good. The staff did not experience that the work had changed. More and larger studies are needed to evaluate changes of organisations that were initiated by the Lean-model.