This thesis deals with the meaning of agriculture in the country area and its effect on the development of the rural areas. My goal is to evaluate the actual realization of resources, which are spent on the support of farmers, who practice in areas with less favourable conditions. This is performed on a regional analysis of the number of handed and accepted requests and on the amount of the land usage in disadvantaged areas with the result that my thesis will concentrate on the evaluation of a regional differentiation. This diploma work will deal with the issue of what kind of the Czech agricultural disadvantaged areas happen to use the financial resources in terms of LFA, and what are the main factors of such differentiation in the relation with the aims of this support. The theoretical part of this thesis targets on the country development and the meaning of agriculture in the country area. It describes methods and approaches of determination of the rural area and less-favoured areas. It also characterizes the Rural Development policy in Czech Republic. The analytical part of this work contains a regional payment analysis (in the concept of the rural area) for a natural disadvantage provided in the mountain areas, and payments provided in other less-favoured areas (LFA) in the programming period 2007-2013 in the Czech Republic. For this regional analysis there are used data especially from the implementation organ SZIF, data from the Agricultural Accounting Data Network FADN, and finally data from the Annual Report of the Rural Development Program. Such data are interpreted on the basis of the method of cartographical projection. Farther, this thesis tries to find out if the aim of such action is realized. On account of the performed analysis, my thesis summarizes acquired findings and draws consecutive conclusions from the realization of support.

Darbo objektas – žemės ūkio viešosios gėrybės mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse. Darbo tikslas – išanalizuoti žemės ūkio viešųjų gėrybių kūrimo mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse poveikį žemdirbių pajamoms. Iškeltam tikslui pasiekti sprendžiami šie uždaviniai: 1. Išnagrinėti viešųjų gėrybių koncepcijos esmę ir pagrįsti reguliavimo būtinumą. 2. Identifikuoti ir išanalizuoti BŽŪP finansinius instrumentus, skatinančius viešųjų gėrybių kūrimą mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse. 3. Išanalizuoti BŽŪP finansinių instrumentų, skatinančių viešųjų gėrybių kūrimą mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse, poveikį ūkininkų pajamoms Lietuvoje. 4. Atskleisti 2007 – 2013 metų BŽŪP vaidmenį skatinant viešųjų gėrybių kūrimą mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse. Tyrimo metodai – mokslinės literatūros bei Europos Sąjungos ir Lietuvos žemės ūkio ir kaimo plėtros dokumentų analizė ir sintezė, lyginamosios analizės, indukcijos, dedukcijos, monografinis, duomenų sisteminimo ir statistinės analizės, grafinio vaizdavimo, apibendrinimo ir kiti metodai. Remiantis viešųjų gėrybių ir žemės ūkio daugiafunkciškumo koncepcijomis bei Europos Sąjungos ir Lietuvos teisinių dokumentų, reglamentuojančių BŽŪP finansinius instrumentus analize, identifikuoti ir išanalizuoti BŽŪP finansiniai instrumentai, skatinantys žemės ūkio viešųjų gėrybių kūrimą mažiau palankiose ūkininkauti vietovėse. Kartu įvertintas Europos Sąjungos paramos poveikis ūkininkų, ūkininkaujančių mažiau palankiose vietovėse... [toliau žr. visą tekstą] / The object of research – agriculture public goods in less favoured areas. The aim of work – to analyze the impact of production of agriculture public goods in less favoured agricultural areas on the income of farmers in Lithuania. Seeking the aim, the tasks are: 1. To analyze the point of the public goods concept and substantiate the necessity of regulation. 2. To identify and analyze the financial instruments of CAP, which promote the production of public goods in less favoured areas. 3. To analyze the impact of CAP financial instruments, which promote the production of public goods in less favoured areas, on the income of farmers in Lithuania 4. To identify the role of CAP in 2007 – 2013 on the promotion to produce public goods in less favoured areas. Methods of research – the analysis and synthesis of scientific literature and the EU and Lithuanian agricultural and rural development documents, comparable analysis, induction, deduction, monographic, data systematization and statistical analysis, graphical depiction, summarizing and other methods. With a reference to the analysis of the concepts of public goods and multifunctional agriculture and EU regulations, CAP financial instruments, which have an impact on production of public goods in less favoured areas, have been analyzed. Also the impact of EU support on the income of the farmers in the less favoured areas has been evaluated.

This thesis deals with the evaluation of the quality of life in rural communities in the Region of Prachatice. The thesis is also focused on the evaluation of the economic weakness of the municipalities, its causes and manifestations, and, at least, the possibility of improving life in these communities. An integral part of this work is finding those sources of funding and the related use of funds and grants. In the theoretical part, I have discussed the importance of the regional and social policy focusing on rural issues and their development, with the development of the regions linked to the use of subsidies and the disbursement of funds, especially funds of the European Union. In the practical part, contingency tables and cluster analysis are used, as well as special methods. The results of this study has confirmed that quality of life in LFA municipalities and their economic weakness depends on the size of the village. The conclusion provides an overall assessment of the work and its results.

No description available.

The essence of the thesis is to evaluate the effectiveness of targeted subsidies in the selected region. Of the many special-purpose grants provided were the following three: Natural handicap payments provided in mountain areas and payments in other less favored areas (LFA), agrienvironmental measures (AEO) and the national supplementary pension (Top-up). On the basis of selected indicators, an evaluation of the effectiveness of targeted support for the period 2005-2010.