Spelling suggestions: "subject:"diability for oil pollution damages"" "subject:"viabilility for oil pollution damages""
1 |
Unbalanced indemnities : a comparative analysis of risk allocation in oilfield service contracts in Malaysia, the UK and USAWan Zahari, Wan Mohd Zulhafiz Bin January 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Liability for marine pollution by shipsYoung, Charles A. January 1976 (has links)
One aspect of the international problem of marine pollution is pollution by ships. As an international problem, pollution by ships demands action at a level above the national.
Many international agreements have been reached, but this thesis argues that a comprehensive liability regime is now necessary. To find the principles upon which such a liability regime should be based, decisions of international tribunals, acts of state practice, and existing conventional arrangements are canvassed. "Reasonableness" is found to be the central characteristic, and is given more specific meaning through the survey.
A convention is proposed in general outline only, but a regional framework is suggested, and principles on which to base the convention are summarized. / Law, Peter A. Allard School of / Graduate
|
3 |
An investigation on compensation for damage of oil pollution from ships with a specific reference to law and practice in ChinaWu, Yan January 2008 (has links)
University of Macau / Faculty of Law
|
4 |
A comparative analysis of the civil liability and fund conventions, Tovalop and Cristal, the U.S. Federal Oil Pollution Act and U.S. state legislation, as legal mechanisms regulating compensation for tanker- source oil pollution damage as of February, 1994.Hunt, John Edward Vere. January 1994 (has links)
The purpose of this thesis is to explain and evaluate the law
concerning compensation for tanker-source oil pollution damage
under three different liability regimes:
(a) the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil
Pollution Damage, 1969 and the International Convention on the
Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil
Pollution Damage, 1971 including the Protocols of 1976, 1984 and
1992 to these Conventions.
(b) the Tanker Owners Voluntary Agreement concerning Liability
for Oil Pollution (TOVALOP) and the Contract Regarding a
Supplement to Tanker Liability for Oil Pollution (CRISTAL) as at
the 20th February, 1994.
(c) the United States Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and U.S. State
Legislation.
In this context the thesis explains inter alia the evolution of
law from fault to no-fault liability and from limited to
increasingly limitless liability. The thesis examines the notion
of damage eligible for compensation, for example, ecological and
pure economic damage. Conclusions are reached as to the role
increasingly stringent liability provisions may have on the
quality of the tanker-process. The impact that the U. S. Oil
Pollution Act 1990, and associated U.S. state legislation may
have on the international pollution regimes covered by the
various international Conventions and associated voluntary
agreements is also discussed. / Thesis (LL.M.)-University of Natal, Durban, 1994.
|
5 |
Civil liability for damage caused by oil pollution from off-shore platforms : a comparative analysis of international and domestic instruments.Blom, Karl. January 2013 (has links)
This dissertation addresses the question of liability for oil spills emanating from offshore
installations, beginning with an analysis of international law, specifically international customary
law, global conventions and regional agreements. Following the analysis of the present
international law, a number of proposals are considered in motivation of a global convention
specifically addressing offshore platforms. Key areas addressed are the scope of the proposed
convention, the standard of liability imposed, the quantum of liability suggested, financial
security measures, dispute resolution proceedings and alternatives to a global convention. Legal
instruments discussed in this portion include the United Nations Law of the Sea Convention, the
International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution and a number of global and regional
legal instruments. This discussion will also draw analogies with the nuclear compensation
regime in motivation for strict liability between States.
The domestic legal framework of the United States of America and South Africa are discussed
and contrasted. The primary federal marine pollution legislation of the USA, the Oil Pollution
Act of 1990, is compared to South Africa’s Marine Pollution (Control and Civil Liability) Act 6
of 1981 in order to determine which provisions are successful and which ought to be amended or
supplemented. Other sources of South Africa law considered include the National Environmental
Management Act 107 of 1998, the Maritime Zones Act 15 of 1994, the Admiralty Jurisdiction
and Regulation Act 105 of 1983 as well principles of South African common law.
The objectives of this research are to identify all the international and domestic legal instruments
that are applicable to offshore platforms, critically evaluate their provisions and propose realistic
amendments and instruments that resolve any lacunae or weaknesses that are identified. / Thesis (LL.M.)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 2013.
|
6 |
Haftung und Entschädigung nach Tankerunfällen auf See Bestandsaufnahme, Rechtsvergleich und Überlegungen de lege ferenda /Altfuldisch, Rainer. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Hamburg. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. [231]-243).
|
7 |
Compulsory Insurance and Compensation for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage /Zhu, Ling. January 2006 (has links)
Univ., Diss.--Hamburg, 2006. / Literaturverz. S. [215] - 225.
|
8 |
Compulsory insurance and compensation for bunker oil pollution damageZhu, Ling. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Hamburg, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [215]-225) and index.
|
Page generated in 0.1358 seconds