Spelling suggestions: "subject:"light -- study anda teaching"" "subject:"light -- study ando teaching""
1 |
An investigation of how grade 10 learners make sense of concepts on refraction of light through exploring their cultural beliefs/everyday experiences about the rainbow : a case studyHomateni, Rauha Kau Ndahalomwenyo January 2013 (has links)
This study took place at a private high school in the Kavango region with my 32 grade 10B learners as the research participants. Its objective was to investigate how the grade 10 learners make sense of concepts on refraction of light through exploring their cultural beliefs/everyday experiences about the rainbow. This research study was essentially triggered by my own classroom experience of teaching the topic on refraction of light. In order to achieve the goal of this research, a qualitative case study located within an interpretive paradigm was adopted. To gather data I used multiple data gathering techniques such as brainstorming session, learners conducting interviews in the community, practical activities and focus group interviews. This resulted in descriptive data that qualified to be analyzed in a qualitative way. The themes that emerged from the generated data were coded using upper letter cases and various colours. A methodological triangulation was employed by using multiple data generation techniques. Member checking during focus group interviews also ensured validity in this case study. The findings of this study revealed that the use of learners’ cultural beliefs/everyday experiences can be used to enhance learner engagement, meaning making and conceptual development during the science lessons. In addition, the ways in which practical activities are designed and presented to learners in the science classroom determine learners’ participation and conceptual attainment. Therefore, based on my research findings, I recommend that teachers need to be trained to be able to elicit and integrate learners’ cultural beliefs/everyday experiences in conjunction with hands-on practical activities which focus on conceptual development during their science lessons. However, although this study had many benefits, it also showed that it is not easy to close the gap between learners’ prior everyday knowledge and school science. This warrants further research.
|
2 |
Influencing fourth grade students' conceptual change about light propagationHsieh, Jinmeei Kuo 10 October 1995 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to examine whether teaching materials designed
around fourth graders' preconceptions effectively produced conceptual change about
light propagation. Four Taiwanese fourth-grade intact classes (194 subjects), taught by
two teachers, participated in this study. The experimental group was exposed to the
conceptual change materials (CCM), and the control group was exposed to the current
traditional materials (non-CCM). A 10-item paper-and-pencil instrument for assessing
conceptual change was developed, which included three categories: Category I, a
window image, a phenomenon children observe in life experiences; Category II, a
pinhole image, a classroom demonstration of how light travels; and Category III,
shadows, an advanced application of light propagation.
T tests were employed to assess differences between the pretest and posttest in
each group. ANCOVA with the General Linear Model procedure was used to assess
differences between the control and experimental groups. No teacher effect and no
interaction between pretest and treatment were found in the procedure; therefore,
pretest scores were used as the covariate and posttest scores were used as the response
in the analysis. Results revealed that, both in the overall test and in Category I, significant differences existed between the experimental group and the control group after the teaching interventions. However, no significant differences existed between the groups in either Category II or Category III after teaching interventions. Children in the experimental group performed significantly better than did
children in the control group in Category I (t=-2.44, p<.05 posttest; t=-2.57, p<.05 delayed posttest), but there was no significant difference between the groups in Categories II and III. CCM appears to work better in life application than in classroom activities and advanced application. The study suggested that the CCM teaching approach was effective, but the low percentage (55%) of the scientifically accepted concepts retained after teaching intervention needs to be improved. The test-retest stability between posttest and delayed posttest indicated that the CCM teaching approach had a lasting effect after two weeks. / Graduation date: 1996
|
3 |
Alternative conceptions concerning interference and diffraction of lightCoetzee, Annaretha January 1998 (has links)
A research report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Education at the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. / The aim of this study was to determine whether alternative conceptions
about interference and diffraction do indeed exist, to identify the most
important of these conceptions and to determine whether these
conceptions relate to textbooks, as one of the main sources of students'
knowledge. An analysis of secondary level textbooks and tertiary level
non-calculus textbooks revealed that presentations of constructive and
destructive interference, diffraction and other related aspects are treated
inconsistently and in some cases contradictorily by different authors. The
research instrument was a Physical Optics test which Physics students of
the Technikon Pretoria wrote. This test revealed that alternative
conceptions on elementary principles of interference and diffraction of
light do exist and that they relate to textbook presentations. This study
reveals that (i) the terms in phese and out of phase are not consistently
used in different textbooks; (ii) the definitions of constructive and
destructive interference in terms of phases cause major aiternative
conceptions, (iii) the interrelation between interference and diffraction is
not clarified. / AC2017
|
Page generated in 0.1033 seconds