Churn prediction methods are widely used in Customer Relationship Management and have proven to be valuable for retaining customers. To obtain a high predictive performance, recent studies rely on increasingly complex machine learning methods, such as ensemble or hybrid models. However, the more complex a model is, the more difficult it becomes to understand how decisions are actually made. Previous studies on machine learning interpretability have used a global perspective for understanding black-box models. This study explores the use of local explanation models for explaining the individual predictions of a Random Forest ensemble model. The churn prediction was studied on the users of Tink – a finance app. This thesis aims to take local explanations one step further by making comparisons between churn indicators of different user groups. Three sets of groups were created based on differences in three user features. The importance scores of all globally found churn indicators were then computed for each group with the help of local explanation models. The results showed that the groups did not have any significant differences regarding the globally most important churn indicators. Instead, differences were found for globally less important churn indicators, concerning the type of information that users stored in the app. In addition to comparing churn indicators between user groups, the result of this study was a well-performing Random Forest ensemble model with the ability of explaining the reason behind churn predictions for individual users. The model proved to be significantly better than a number of simpler models, with an average AUC of 0.93. / Metoder för att prediktera utträde är vanliga inom Customer Relationship Management och har visat sig vara värdefulla när det kommer till att behålla kunder. För att kunna prediktera utträde med så hög säkerhet som möjligt har den senasteforskningen fokuserat på alltmer komplexa maskininlärningsmodeller, såsom ensembler och hybridmodeller. En konsekvens av att ha alltmer komplexa modellerär dock att det blir svårare och svårare att förstå hur en viss modell har kommitfram till ett visst beslut. Tidigare studier inom maskininlärningsinterpretering har haft ett globalt perspektiv för att förklara svårförståeliga modeller. Denna studieutforskar lokala förklaringsmodeller för att förklara individuella beslut av en ensemblemodell känd som 'Random Forest'. Prediktionen av utträde studeras påanvändarna av Tink – en finansapp. Syftet med denna studie är att ta lokala förklaringsmodeller ett steg längre genomatt göra jämförelser av indikatorer för utträde mellan olika användargrupper. Totalt undersöktes tre par av grupper som påvisade skillnader i tre olika variabler. Sedan användes lokala förklaringsmodeller till att beräkna hur viktiga alla globaltfunna indikatorer för utträde var för respektive grupp. Resultaten visade att detinte fanns några signifikanta skillnader mellan grupperna gällande huvudindikatorerna för utträde. Istället visade resultaten skillnader i mindre viktiga indikatorer som hade att göra med den typ av information som lagras av användarna i appen. Förutom att undersöka skillnader i indikatorer för utträde resulterade dennastudie i en välfungerande modell för att prediktera utträde med förmågan attförklara individuella beslut. Random Forest-modellen visade sig vara signifikantbättre än ett antal enklare modeller, med ett AUC-värde på 0.93.

In the past few years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved into a powerful tool applied in multi-disciplinary fields to resolve sophisticated problems. As AI becomes more powerful and ubiquitous, oftentimes the AI methods also become opaque, which might lead to trust issues for the users of the AI systems as well as fail to meet the legal requirements of AI transparency. In this report, the possibility of making a credit-card fraud detection support system explainable to users is investigated through a quantitative survey. A publicly available credit card dataset was used. Deep Learning and Random Forest were the two Machine Learning (ML) methodsimplemented and applied on the credit card fraud dataset, and the performance of their results was evaluated in terms of their accuracy, recall, sufficiency, and F1 score. After that, two explainable AI (XAI) methods - SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) were implemented and applied to the results obtained from these two ML methods. Finally, the XAI results were evaluated through a quantitative survey. The results from the survey revealed that the XAI explanations can slightly increase the users' impression of the system's ability to reason and LIME had a slight advantage over SHAP in terms of explainability. Further investigation of visualizing data pre-processing and the training process is suggested to offer deep explanations for users.