1 v. (various paging) : ill., tables, graphs ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.1978) from the Dept. of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Adelaide

Thesis (Ph.D. 1978) from the Department of Human Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Adelaide.

Background: This dissertation is composed of five individual studies of the stapled haemorrhoidopexy operation. The operation was launched to an international audience in 1998 by the Italian surgeon Antonio Longo. In conventional surgery the prolapsed piles are excised from the anodermal part of the prolapse up through the anal canal into the lower rectal mucosa where the pile is divided with diathermy or suture ligated and excised. It leaves open wounds throughout the anal canal. These wounds can be very painful, especially at defecation, and will take from three to six weeks to heal. In the stapled haemorrhoidopexy operation symptomatic haemorrhoids are seen as a disease of anodermal, haemorrhoidal and rectal mucosal prolapse of varying degree. The main component of the prolapse is the redundancy of rectal mucosa. By pushing back the prolapse into the anal canal followed by excision of the mucosal redundancy above the anal canal with a circular stapler devise a mucosal anastomosis is fashioned. This anastomosis is situated immediately above the haemorrhoids and will attach them to the rectal muscular wall to prevent further prolapse. The operation is associated with substantially less pain and a quicker recovery. Methods: For the five studies, a total of 334 patients were operated for haemorrhoidal prolapse. The first operations were performed in February 1998. All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with the same set of protocols as follows. The symptoms of haemorrhoids were scored with a questionnaire to patients to obtain their independent statements of the frequency of each of five cardinal symptoms: pain, bleeding, pruritus, soiling and prolapse in need of manual reduction. A diary was used by patients to report daily pain scores, use of pain medication and speed of recovery within the first 14 postoperative days. The surgeon rated the deranged anal anatomy before and after surgery. We also developed an algorithm based on the patients’ statement of digital reduction of prolapse (grade 3) and the surgeon’s assessment of lesser prolapse at proctoscopy (grade 2). Absence of prolapse was grade 1. The surgeon also provided statements about the conduct of the operation and rated the technical complexity. The information, for all patients, was entered into an electronic data base. Results: One registry based study and one prospective randomised controlled trial assessed the advantage of performing the operation under perianal local anaesthetic block. The postoperative pain and surgical outcome was independent of the type of anaesthesia. No operation under local block had to be converted to general anaesthesia. Anodermal prolapse is seen in 70 percent of the patients. In a registry-based study we found that excision of the anodermal folds did not increase the postoperative pain provided the excision stopped at the anal verge. In 270 patients with precise preoperative and postoperative classification we found that the symptomatic load was identical for grades 2 and 3. The symptoms were independent of the anodermal prolapse. The symptoms were greatly reduced when the operation turned out grade 1 prolapse. The long-term result was assessed in 153 patients operated 1 year to 6 years previously. The need for early re-intervention was 6.2 percent representing technical error to reduce the prolapse. At the final evaluation 12 patients (8.2 percent) complained of a mucoanal prolapse in need of digital reduction. The mean symptom burden had been reduced from 8.1 to 2.5 points but 17 percent had at least one cardinal symptom with a weekly frequency. Conclusions: Stapled haemorrhoidopexy should be performed as day surgery under local anaesthesia. Any remaining anodermal prolapse should be excised. The optimal long-term outcome is grade 1A or 1B with low symptom score. There was an 87 percent chance of cure of the prolapse with the first haemorrhoidopexy. About half the failures were insufficient primary surgery and half a relapse of the prolapse. / <p>The original title of article IV was "Prolapse grade and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patients. The new title after publishing the article is "Grade of prolapse and symptoms of haemorrhoids are poorly correlated: result of a classification algorithm in 270 patients".</p>

Local anaesthetics have been implemented extensively in the case of a variety of painful superficial procedures, venipuncture, skin graft harvesting, anal or genital pruritus, poison ivy rashes, postherpetic neuralgia and several other dermatoses. The dilemma with commercially available local acting anaesthetics is that it may take well up to an hour to produce an anaesthetic effect. Anaesthetics have to traverse the highly efficient barrier, the stratum corneum, in order to reach the intended target site which is the free nerve endings located in the dermis. The objective of this study was to compare the transdermal delivery of an eutectic combination of two ionisable amide types of local anaesthetics, lidocaine HCI and prilocaine HCI, delivered with the novel Pheroid™ technology to that of a commercially available product in order to establish whether the lag time could be significantly reduced. Several techniques of promoting the penetration of these anaesthetics have previously been employed, including occlusive dressing, entrapment in liposomes and miscelles, iontophoretic delivery and so forth. The Pheroid™ delivery system is novel technology that entails improved delivery of several active compounds. It is a submicron emulsion type formulation that possesses the ability to be transformed in morphology and size, thereby affording it tremendous flexibility. Since it primarily consists of unsaturated essential fatty acids, it is not seen as foreign to the body but rather as a skin-friendly carrier. Vertical Franz cell diffusion studies were performed over a 12 hour period using Caucasian female abdominal skin obtained, with the consent of the donor, from abdominoplastic surgery. Comparison was made between the commercial product EMLA® cream, the active local anaesthetics dissolved in phosphate buffered solution (PBS) and the active ingredients entrapped within Pheroid™ vesicles. Distinct entrapment could be ascertained visually by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The amount of drug that traversed the epidermal membrane into the receptor phase was then assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results obtained with the Pheroid™ vesicles revealed a biphasic character with rapid permeation during the first two hours, followed by a plateau between 3 to 12 hours. The initial dramatic increase in percentage yield and flux indicates that the Pheroid™ carrier enhances the transdermal delivery of the actives in order to accelerate the onset of action. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

Local anaesthetics have been implemented extensively in the case of a variety of painful superficial procedures, venipuncture, skin graft harvesting, anal or genital pruritus, poison ivy rashes, postherpetic neuralgia and several other dermatoses. The dilemma with commercially available local acting anaesthetics is that it may take well up to an hour to produce an anaesthetic effect. Anaesthetics have to traverse the highly efficient barrier, the stratum corneum, in order to reach the intended target site which is the free nerve endings located in the dermis. The objective of this study was to compare the transdermal delivery of an eutectic combination of two ionisable amide types of local anaesthetics, lidocaine HCI and prilocaine HCI, delivered with the novel Pheroid™ technology to that of a commercially available product in order to establish whether the lag time could be significantly reduced. Several techniques of promoting the penetration of these anaesthetics have previously been employed, including occlusive dressing, entrapment in liposomes and miscelles, iontophoretic delivery and so forth. The Pheroid™ delivery system is novel technology that entails improved delivery of several active compounds. It is a submicron emulsion type formulation that possesses the ability to be transformed in morphology and size, thereby affording it tremendous flexibility. Since it primarily consists of unsaturated essential fatty acids, it is not seen as foreign to the body but rather as a skin-friendly carrier. Vertical Franz cell diffusion studies were performed over a 12 hour period using Caucasian female abdominal skin obtained, with the consent of the donor, from abdominoplastic surgery. Comparison was made between the commercial product EMLA® cream, the active local anaesthetics dissolved in phosphate buffered solution (PBS) and the active ingredients entrapped within Pheroid™ vesicles. Distinct entrapment could be ascertained visually by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The amount of drug that traversed the epidermal membrane into the receptor phase was then assayed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results obtained with the Pheroid™ vesicles revealed a biphasic character with rapid permeation during the first two hours, followed by a plateau between 3 to 12 hours. The initial dramatic increase in percentage yield and flux indicates that the Pheroid™ carrier enhances the transdermal delivery of the actives in order to accelerate the onset of action. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmaceutics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.

This study investigates the prevalence of peri-operative anxiety and the effective management of intra-operative anxiety during awake surgery. Plastic and vascular surgical patients were selected for the study as many procedures performed within these specialities are performed under local or regional anaesthesia. The study consists of two distinct stages. The first stage was a postal survey of patients (n=213) who had undergone awake plastic, renal access or carotid surgery up to two weeks previously, in order to determine retrospectively the prevalence of peri-operative anxiety. The second stage of the study was a randomised controlled trial of interventions for the effective management of intra-operative anxiety in patients (n=128) having undergone the same surgical procedures described in stage one. The interventions tested in stage two were handholding and an anxiety management package involving a relaxation technique and a procedural information leaflet, against a 'usual care' control. The findings from stage one of the study suggest that peri-operative anxiety prevalence is low, although unacceptable levels of anxiety are seen to elevate during the intra-operative phase. The RCT in stage two demonstrated that intra-operative anxiety was no more effectively managed by the interventions tested than by usual care alone. The validity and reliability of retrospective anxiety measurement was investigated by comparing anxiety scores from stage one with contemporaneous and post-hoc anxiety scores from stage two and found to be an accurate measure of anxiety experienced at the time of the event.

<p><font face="Tahoma"> <p align="left">The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery and to establish specific guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in the department of Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery (MFOS) at Tygerberg Academic, Groote Schuur and Mitchells Plain Hospitals.</p> </font></p>

<p><font face="Tahoma"> <p align="left">The purpose of this study is to evaluate the need for prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery and to establish specific guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in the department of Maxillo-Facial and Oral Surgery (MFOS) at Tygerberg Academic, Groote Schuur and Mitchells Plain Hospitals.</p> </font></p>

Local anaesthetics are used regularly in the medical world for a variety of different procedures. Topical anaesthetics are used largely in minor skin breaking procedures, laceration repair and minor surgical procedures such as laryngoscopy, oesophagoscopy or urethroscopy (Franchi et al., 2008:186e1). The topical means of application of a local anaesthetic is non-invasive and painless that results in a good patient acceptability profile (Little et al., 2008:102). An existing commercial topical anaesthetic product contains a eutectic mixture of the amide-type local anaesthetics lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) and prilocaine hydrochloride (HCl). This commercial product takes up to an hour to produce an anaesthetic effect. This is considered as a disadvantage in the use of topical anaesthetics, an hour waiting time is not always ideal in certain medical circumstances (Wahlgren & Quiding, 2000:584). This study compared the lag times, transdermal and topical delivery of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl from four different semi-solid formulations with the inclusion of a current commercial product. One of the formulated semi-solid formulations included Pheroid™ technology, a novel skin-friendly delivery system developed by the Unit for Drug Research and Development at the North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa. The skin is the body’s first line of defence against noxious external stimuli. It is considered the largest organ in the body with an intensive and complex structure. It consists of five layers with the first outer layer, the stratum corneum, the most impermeable (Williams, 2003:1). The stratum corneum has excellent barrier function characteristics and is the cause for the time delay in the transdermal delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) (Barry, 2007:569). Local anaesthetics need to penetrate all the epidermal skin layers in order to reach their target site, the dermis. Skin appendages as well as blood vessels and skin nerve endings are located in the dermis. Local anaesthetics have to reach the free nerve endings in the dermis in order to cause a reversible block on these nerves for a local anaesthetic effect (Richards & McConachie, 1995:41). Penetration enhancement strategies for the transdermal delivery of lidocaine and prilocaine have been investigated and include methods like liposomal entrapment (Franz-Montan et al., 2010; Müller et al., 2004), micellisation (Scherlund et al., 2000), occlusive dressing (Astra Zeneca, 2006), heating techniques (Masud et al., 2010) and iontophoresis (Brounéus et al., 2000). The Pheroid™ delivery system has improved the transdermal delivery of several compounds with its enhanced entrapment capabilities. Pheroid™ consists mainly of unsaturated essential fatty-acids, non-harmful substances that are easily recognised by the body (Grobler et al., 2008:285). The morphology and size of Pheroid™ is easily manipulated because it is a submicron emulsion type formulation which provides it with a vast flexibility profile (Grobler et al., 2008:284). Vesicular entrapment was used to entrap lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl in the Pheroid™ and incorporated into an emulgel formulation. An emulgel without the inclusion of Pheroid™ was formulated for comparison with the Pheroid™ emulgel as well as with a hydrogel. Pheroid™ solution was prepared and compared to a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) without Pheroid™, both containing lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl as APIs. Franz cell type transdermal diffusion studies were performed on the four semi-solid formulations (emulgel, Pheroid™ emulgel, hydrogel and the commercial product) and two solutions (PBS and Pheroid™). The diffusion studies were performed over a 12 h period followed by the tape stripping of the skin after each diffusion study. Caucasian female abdominal skin was obtained with consent from the donors. The skin for the diffusion cells were prepared by using a Zimmer Dermatome®. PBS (pH 7.4) was prepared as the receptor phase of the diffusion studies. The receptor phase was extracted at certain pre-determined time intervals and analysed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the amount of API that had traversed the skin. Stratum corneum-epidermis samples and epidermis-dermis samples were prepared and left over night at 4 °C and analysed the next day with HPLC. This was done to determine the amount of API that accumulated in the epidermis-dermis and the amount of API that were left on the outer skin layers (stratum corneum-epidermis). The results from the Franz cell diffusion studies indicated that the emulgel formulation without Pheroid™ shortened the lag time of lidocaine HCl and that the emulgel formulated with Pheroid™ shortened the lag time of prilocaine HCl, when compared to the commercial product. Pheroid™ did not enhance the flux of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl into the skin. The hydrogel formulation demonstrated a high transdermal flux of prilocaine HCl due to the hydrating effect it had on the stratum corneum. The commercial product yielded high flux values for both APIs but it did not result in a high concentration of the APIs delivered to the epidermis-dermis. Pheroid™ technology did, however, enhance the epidermal-dermal delivery of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl into the skin epidermis-dermis. The stability of the emulgel formulation, Pheroid™ emulgel formulation and the hydrogel formulation was examined over a 6 month period. The formulations were stored at 25 °C/60% RH, 30 °C/60% RH and 40 °C/75% RH. The API concentration, mass, pH, zeta potential, particle size, viscosity and visual appearance for each formulation at the different storage conditions were noted and compared at month 0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 to determine if the formulations remained stable for 6 months. The results obtained from the stability study demonstrated that none of the formulations were stable for 6 months. The emulgel remained stable for the first 3 months. At 6 months, large decreases in API concentration and pH occurred which could cause a loss of anaesthetic action in the formulations. The Pheroid™ emulgel formulation did not remain stable for 6 months. / Thesis (MSc (Pharmaceutics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.

Local anaesthetics are used regularly in the medical world for a variety of different procedures. Topical anaesthetics are used largely in minor skin breaking procedures, laceration repair and minor surgical procedures such as laryngoscopy, oesophagoscopy or urethroscopy (Franchi et al., 2008:186e1). The topical means of application of a local anaesthetic is non-invasive and painless that results in a good patient acceptability profile (Little et al., 2008:102). An existing commercial topical anaesthetic product contains a eutectic mixture of the amide-type local anaesthetics lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) and prilocaine hydrochloride (HCl). This commercial product takes up to an hour to produce an anaesthetic effect. This is considered as a disadvantage in the use of topical anaesthetics, an hour waiting time is not always ideal in certain medical circumstances (Wahlgren & Quiding, 2000:584). This study compared the lag times, transdermal and topical delivery of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl from four different semi-solid formulations with the inclusion of a current commercial product. One of the formulated semi-solid formulations included Pheroid™ technology, a novel skin-friendly delivery system developed by the Unit for Drug Research and Development at the North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, South Africa. The skin is the body’s first line of defence against noxious external stimuli. It is considered the largest organ in the body with an intensive and complex structure. It consists of five layers with the first outer layer, the stratum corneum, the most impermeable (Williams, 2003:1). The stratum corneum has excellent barrier function characteristics and is the cause for the time delay in the transdermal delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) (Barry, 2007:569). Local anaesthetics need to penetrate all the epidermal skin layers in order to reach their target site, the dermis. Skin appendages as well as blood vessels and skin nerve endings are located in the dermis. Local anaesthetics have to reach the free nerve endings in the dermis in order to cause a reversible block on these nerves for a local anaesthetic effect (Richards & McConachie, 1995:41). Penetration enhancement strategies for the transdermal delivery of lidocaine and prilocaine have been investigated and include methods like liposomal entrapment (Franz-Montan et al., 2010; Müller et al., 2004), micellisation (Scherlund et al., 2000), occlusive dressing (Astra Zeneca, 2006), heating techniques (Masud et al., 2010) and iontophoresis (Brounéus et al., 2000). The Pheroid™ delivery system has improved the transdermal delivery of several compounds with its enhanced entrapment capabilities. Pheroid™ consists mainly of unsaturated essential fatty-acids, non-harmful substances that are easily recognised by the body (Grobler et al., 2008:285). The morphology and size of Pheroid™ is easily manipulated because it is a submicron emulsion type formulation which provides it with a vast flexibility profile (Grobler et al., 2008:284). Vesicular entrapment was used to entrap lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl in the Pheroid™ and incorporated into an emulgel formulation. An emulgel without the inclusion of Pheroid™ was formulated for comparison with the Pheroid™ emulgel as well as with a hydrogel. Pheroid™ solution was prepared and compared to a phosphate buffer solution (PBS) without Pheroid™, both containing lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl as APIs. Franz cell type transdermal diffusion studies were performed on the four semi-solid formulations (emulgel, Pheroid™ emulgel, hydrogel and the commercial product) and two solutions (PBS and Pheroid™). The diffusion studies were performed over a 12 h period followed by the tape stripping of the skin after each diffusion study. Caucasian female abdominal skin was obtained with consent from the donors. The skin for the diffusion cells were prepared by using a Zimmer Dermatome®. PBS (pH 7.4) was prepared as the receptor phase of the diffusion studies. The receptor phase was extracted at certain pre-determined time intervals and analysed with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to determine the amount of API that had traversed the skin. Stratum corneum-epidermis samples and epidermis-dermis samples were prepared and left over night at 4 °C and analysed the next day with HPLC. This was done to determine the amount of API that accumulated in the epidermis-dermis and the amount of API that were left on the outer skin layers (stratum corneum-epidermis). The results from the Franz cell diffusion studies indicated that the emulgel formulation without Pheroid™ shortened the lag time of lidocaine HCl and that the emulgel formulated with Pheroid™ shortened the lag time of prilocaine HCl, when compared to the commercial product. Pheroid™ did not enhance the flux of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl into the skin. The hydrogel formulation demonstrated a high transdermal flux of prilocaine HCl due to the hydrating effect it had on the stratum corneum. The commercial product yielded high flux values for both APIs but it did not result in a high concentration of the APIs delivered to the epidermis-dermis. Pheroid™ technology did, however, enhance the epidermal-dermal delivery of lidocaine HCl and prilocaine HCl into the skin epidermis-dermis. The stability of the emulgel formulation, Pheroid™ emulgel formulation and the hydrogel formulation was examined over a 6 month period. The formulations were stored at 25 °C/60% RH, 30 °C/60% RH and 40 °C/75% RH. The API concentration, mass, pH, zeta potential, particle size, viscosity and visual appearance for each formulation at the different storage conditions were noted and compared at month 0, 1, 2, 3 and 6 to determine if the formulations remained stable for 6 months. The results obtained from the stability study demonstrated that none of the formulations were stable for 6 months. The emulgel remained stable for the first 3 months. At 6 months, large decreases in API concentration and pH occurred which could cause a loss of anaesthetic action in the formulations. The Pheroid™ emulgel formulation did not remain stable for 6 months. / Thesis (MSc (Pharmaceutics))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013.