Le développement des logiciels avioniques les plus critiques, comme les commandes de vol électriques, présentent plusieurs contraintes qui peuvent être quasiment contradictoires – par exemple, performance et sûreté – et toutes ces contraintes doivent être respectées simultanément. L'objective de cette thèse est d'étudier et de proposer des évolutions dans le cycle de développement des logiciels de commande de vol chez Airbus afin d'améliorer leur performance, tout en respectant les contraintes industrielles existantes et en conservant des processus de vérification au moins aussi sûrs que ceux utilisés actuellement. Le critère principal d'évaluation de performance est le temps d'exécution au pire cas (WCET), vu qu'il est utilisé lors des analyses temporelles des logiciels de vol réels. Dans un premier temps, le DO-178, qui contient des considérations pour l'approbation des logiciels avioniques, est présenté. Le DO-178B et le DO-178C sont étudiés. Le DO-178B est la référence pour plusieurs logiciels de commande de vol développés chez Airbus et le DO-178C est la référence pour le développement des nouveaux logiciels à partir de 2012. Ensuite, l'étude de cas est présentée. Afin d'améliorer sa compréhension, le contexte historique est fourni à travers l'étude des autres logiciels de commande de vol, car plusieurs activités de son cycle de vie réutilisent des techniques qui ont été utilisées avec succès dans des projets précédents. Quelques activités qui présentent des causes potentielles de pertes de performance logicielle sont exposées et l'axe principal d'étude choisi pour le reste de la thèse est la phase de compilation. Ce choix se justifie dans le contexte des logiciels de commande de vol car la compilation est réalisée avec peu ou pas d'optimisations, son impact sur la performance des logiciels est donc important et des travaux de recherche récents permettent d'envisager un changement dans les paradigmes actuels de compilation sûre. / The development of safety-critical avionics software, such as aircraft flight control programs, presents many different constraints that are nearly contradictory, such as performance and safety requirements, and all must be met simultaneously. The objective of this Thesis is to propose modifications in the development cycle of Airbus flight control programs in order to improve their performance without weakening their verification processes or violating other industrial constraints. The main criterion for performance evaluation is the Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET), as it is used in the timing analysis that is performed in actual avionics software verification processes. In a first moment, the DO-178, which contains guidance for avionics software development approval, is presented. Both the DO-178B and the DO-178C are discussed, since the former was the reference for the development of many Airbus flight control programs and the latter shall be the reference for the development of new programs, starting from 2012. Then, the case study is presented. In order to better understand it, some historical context is provided by the study of other flight control programs - many of its life cycle activities reuse techniques that were successful in previous software projects. Each activity is evaluated in order to underline what are the performance bottlenecks in the flight control software development. Some potential underperforming activities are depicted and the main axis of study developed subsequently is the compilation phase: not only it is a well-known unoptimized activity that has important impacts over software performance, but it is also an activity that might undergo a paradigm change due to innovating compilers that are being developed by researchers. The CompCert compiler is presented and its use in the scope of this Thesis is justified - at the time of this Thesis, it was the compiler that was best prepared to perform meaningful experiments, such as compiling a large subset of the chosen case study. Its architecture is studied, together with its semantic preservation theorem, which is the backbone of its formally-verified part. Additional features that were developed in CompCert during this Thesis in order to meet Airbus's requirements - such as its annotation mechanism and its reference interpreter - are discussed in order to underline their usefulness in the development of flight control software. The evaluation of CompCert consists in a performance comparison with the current compilation strategy and an assessment of the impacts that its utilization might have over the verification strategy commonly employed in flight control software. The results of the performance comparison are promising, since CompCert-generated code has a WCET more than 10% lower than if it were compiled with a good quality non-optimizing compiler. As expected, the use of CompCert has impacts over some important verification activities but its formal development and increased verifiability helps in the development of new compiler verification activities that can keep the whole development process at least as safe as the current one. Some development strategy propositions are then presented, according to the certification credit that might be required by using CompCert.