Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2017-10-27T19:55:52Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - EMANUEL BAGETTI ZEIFERT.pdf: 972502 bytes, checksum: e2bdc1c5dc97f8235fe2c15aa589ea89 (MD5) / Rejected by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br), reason: Devolvido devido a data de defesa cadastrada na publica??o (27/08/2017) estar diferente da data que consta na folha de aprova??o da banca do PDF (24/08/2017). on 2017-11-07T13:49:59Z (GMT) / Submitted by PPG Filosofia (filosofia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-07T17:07:19Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - EMANUEL BAGETTI ZEIFERT.pdf: 972502 bytes, checksum: e2bdc1c5dc97f8235fe2c15aa589ea89 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-11-17T11:42:33Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - EMANUEL BAGETTI ZEIFERT.pdf: 972502 bytes, checksum: e2bdc1c5dc97f8235fe2c15aa589ea89 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-17T11:49:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - EMANUEL BAGETTI ZEIFERT.pdf: 972502 bytes, checksum: e2bdc1c5dc97f8235fe2c15aa589ea89 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-24 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This study deals with some aspects concerning the relationship between the Hermeneutic Phenomenology of Martin Heidegger and the Systematic Structural Philosophy of Lorenz Puntel. Although there is a significant difference in the way each of the philosophers present their thought, we maintain that there is a very important bond with respect to presuppositions and questions involving each conception. To endorse that thesis, the first step was to develop the perspective from which it would be possible to prove the existence of such a bond. In order to do so, it was important to explain how philosophical conceptions relate to each other by way of concepts, themes and theoretical convictions. For the purpose of accomplishing this task, it was necessary to develop an approach, which was thought in three distinct stages: interpretation, comparison and evaluation. In the part devoted to interpretation, we sought to make clear the set of beliefs that constitute the philosophical position of Heidegger. In addition, the main themes where these convictions are articulated were presented. This stage served as a basis for the Hermeneutic Phenomenology to be compared with the systematic structural conception. In comparing such conceptions, we list those themes and assumptions that we consider the fundamental links of the philosophical bond between both understandings. From this it was possible, finally, to evaluate the positive and negative aspects, as well as the amplitude and the limitation of each approach. / Este estudo trata de alguns aspectos referentes ? rela??o entre a Fenomenologia Hermen?utica de Martin Heidegger e a Filosofia Estrutural Sistem?tica de Lorenz Puntel. Embora exista uma diferen?a significativa no modo por meio do qual cada um dos fil?sofos apresenta o seu pensamento, sustentamos que h? um v?nculo muito importante no que diz respeito aos pressupostos e quest?es envolvendo cada uma das concep??es. Para comprovar essa tese, o primeiro passo consistiu em desenvolver a perspectiva a partir da qual seria poss?vel confirmar a exist?ncia desse v?nculo. Foram importantes, para isso, explicitar de que modo concep??es filos?ficas se relacionam atrav?s de conceitos, temas e convic??es te?ricas. Nessa discuss?o, mostrou-se indispens?vel o desenvolvimento de um enfoque que tornasse poss?vel essa tarefa, o qual foi pensado em tr?s etapas distintas: interpreta??o, compara??o e avalia??o. Na parte dedicada ? interpreta??o, buscamos explicitar o conjunto de convic??es que constituem a posi??o filos?fica de Heidegger. Al?m disso, foram apresentados os principais temas em que estas convic??es est?o articuladas. Essa etapa serviu de base para que a Fenomenologia Hermen?utica pudesse ser ent?o comparada com a concep??o estrutural sistem?tica. Na compara??o das concep??es, elencamos aqueles temas e pressupostos que consideramos os elos fundamentais do v?nculo filos?fico entre ambas. A partir disso foi poss?vel, por fim, avaliar os aspectos positivos e negativos, bem como a amplitude e a limita??o de cada uma das abordagens.