Lumbar fusion performed among injured workers has dramatically increased over the past two decades, coinciding with the increased use of more advanced surgical technology. Despite recent changes in how this surgery is performed, few outcome studies have been conducted, particularly among workers compensation populations. In prior studies, several biopsychosocial risk factors were found to be predictors of functional outcomes of lumbar fusion. Considering the recent changes in lumbar fusion surgery, there is a need to identify how patient outcomes have changed among injured workers, and whether a biopsychosocial model continues to be predictive of outcomes. The current study aimed to address multidimensional patient outcomes associated with lumbar fusion and examine the relationship between presurgical biopsychosocial variables and outcomes by testing the predictive efficacy of a multiple variable model. Injured workers (N = 245) who underwent their first lumbar fusion between 1998 and 2007 were included in a retrospective-cohort study performed in two phases that involved coding presurgical information documented in patient medical charts in the Worker's Compensation Fund of Utah computer database (Phase 1) and administering a telephone outcome survey with patients at least 2 years post-surgery (Phase 2). Of the total sample, 45% (n = 110) of patients were contacted and completed follow-up outcome surveys on several measures of patient satisfaction, quality of life, fusion status, dysfunction level, disability status, pain, and general physical and mental health functioning. Results revealed injured workers reported a solid fusion rate of 89.0%, disability rate of 28.7%, and a poor outcome rate of 57.1%. Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated an eight variable model was a statistically significant predictor of multiple patient outcomes. Involvement of a nurse case manger, vocational rehabilitation, and litigation at the time of fusion were the most prominent predictors across outcome measures, while age and depression history showed modest prediction of outcomes. Prior back operations, number of vertebral levels fused, and type of instrumentation showed no statistically significant prediction of outcomes. Results were evaluated and compared to prior lumber fusion studies on injured worker and fusion outcome literature, in general. Specific implications for our findings and limitations associated with this study were addressed.

Lumbar fusion surgery is a commonly used procedure to treat severe spinal pathology and associated chronic disabling low back and leg pain. Despite the common incidence of spinal fusion surgery, few studies have examined patient outcomes or predictive correlates of this procedure. The objectives of this study were to characterize Utah workers who received lumbar fusion surgery in terms of relevant presurgical and outcome variables and to identify presurgical correlates of patient outcomes. An archival prospective research design was utilized consisting of a retrospective medical chart review and a postsurgical telephone outcome survey. Subjects were 203 workers' compensation patients from the state of Utah who have undergone spinal fusion surgery and who were at least 2 years postsurgery at time of follow-up. Outcomes were assessed for 144 of the 203 patients (71%). Presurgical measures _included demographic, work, compensation, disability, health, surgical, and physiological variables. Outcome measures included solid arthrosis, patient satisfaction, work disability status, functional disability due to back pain, and multidimensional health. Analysis of patient outcome data revealed that solid arthrosis was achieved in 71.9% of patients. Forty-six percent of subjects felt their back/leg pain problems were worse than what they had expected following the surgery, and 42 % felt that their quality of life had not changed or worsened as a result of lumbar fusion. Twenty-eight percent of fusion patients were work disabled at follow-up. Fusion patient mean outcome scores on multidimensional health measures reflected poorer health than comparative medical patient and nonpatient norms. The most consistent presurgical correlates across outcomes were lawyer involvement, number of prior low back operations, age at injury, and household income at time of injury. Results are compared to data from previous lumbar fusion research studies and reasons for varying findings are offered. Implications of the findings are discussed in terms of inadequate patient selection and insufficient assessment of patient outcomes in low back research studies. Limitations of the present research are discussed, including how placebo, natural history, and regression to the mean can lead to erroneous conclusions about the efficacy of lumber fusion surgery. Suggestions for improvements in low back surgery outcome research are offered.

No description available.

No description available.

Objectif: Nous avons effectué une étude chez 135 patients ayant subis une chirurgie lombo-sacrée avec vissage pédiculaire sous navigation par tomographie axiale. Nous avons évalué la précision des vis pédiculaires et les résultats cliniques. Méthodes: Cette étude comporte 44 hommes et 91 femmes (âge moyen=61, intervalle 24-90 ans). Les diamètres, longueurs et trajectoires des 836 vis ont été planifiés en préopératoire avec un système de navigation (SNN, Surgical Navigation Network, Mississauga). Les patients ont subi une fusion lombaire (55), lombo-sacrée (73) et thoraco-lombo-sacrée (7). La perforation pédiculaire, la longueur des vis et les spondylolisthesis sont évalués par tomographies axiales postopératoires. Le niveau de douleur est mesuré par autoévaluations, échelles visuelles analogues et questionnaires (Oswestry et SF-36). La fusion osseuse a été évaluée par l’examen des radiographies postopératoires. Résultats: Une perforation des pédicules est présente pour 49/836 (5.9%) des vis (2.4% latéral, 1.7% inférieur, 1.1% supérieur, 0.7% médial). Les erreurs ont été mineures (0.1-2mm, 46/49) ou intermédiaires (2.1 - 4mm, 3/49 en latéral). Il y a aucune erreur majeure (≥ 4.1mm). Certaines vis ont été jugées trop longues (66/836, 8%). Le temps moyen pour insérer une vis en navigation a été de 19.1 minutes de l΄application au retrait du cadre de référence. Un an postopératoire on note une amélioration de la douleur des jambes et lombaire de 72% et 48% en moyenne respectivement. L’amélioration reste stable après 2 ans. La dégénérescence radiologique au dessus et sous la fusion a été retrouvée chez 44 patients (33%) and 3 patients respectivement (2%). Elle est survenue en moyenne 22.2 ± 2.6 mois après la chirurgie. Les fusions se terminant à L2 ont été associées à plus de dégénération (14/25, 56%). Conclusion: La navigation spinale basée sur des images tomographiques préopératoires est une technique sécuritaire et précise. Elle donne de bons résultats à court terme justifiant l’investissement de temps chirurgical. La dégénérescence segmentaire peut avoir un impact négatif sur les résultats radiologique et cliniques. / Objective: The authors studied 135 consecutive patients following a lumbo-sacral fixation using pedicle screws and CT-based navigation to evaluate pedicle screw accuracy and clinical outcomes. Methods: The series included 44 men and 91 women (mean age 61 years, range 24-90 years). All 836 screws were planned with pre-operative CT-Scans in a navigation system (SNN, Surgical Navigation Network, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) for diameter, length and direction. Fixation included the lumbar spines only (55), the lumbo-sacral spine (73) or the thoraco-lumbo-sacral spine (7). Pedicle perforation, screw length and spondylolisthesis were assessed on post-operative CT-Scan. Pain was surveyed using self-rated scales, visual analogue scales, Oswestry and SF-36 questionnaires. Bony union was assessed on post-operative follow-up radiographs. Results: Pedicle perforation was found in 49/836 (5.9%) screws (2.4% laterally, 1.7% inferiorly, 1.1% superiorly, 0.7% medially). The errors were minor (0.1-2mm, 46/49) or intermediate (2.1 – 4 mm, 3/49). All intermediate errors were lateral. There were no major errors (≥ 4.1mm). Some screws were judged too long (66/836, 8%). The average time to insert one screw with navigation was 19.1 minutes from application to removal of the reference frame. The amount of improvement at one year post-operation for self-rated leg and back pain were 72% and 48% respectively. The improvement was stable over 2 years. Above-level and below-level radiological degenerations were found in 44 patients (33%) and 3 patients respectively (2%) and occurred on average 22.2 ± 2.6 months after the surgery. Fusions ending at L2 had the most degenerations (14/25, 56%). Conclusion: CT-based preoperative navigation for lumbo-sacral pedicle screw insertion is accurate and associated with a good short term outcome, making it worth the investment of the additional time required. Segmental degeneration may have a negative effect on radiological and clinical outcomes.

Objectif: Nous avons effectué une étude chez 135 patients ayant subis une chirurgie lombo-sacrée avec vissage pédiculaire sous navigation par tomographie axiale. Nous avons évalué la précision des vis pédiculaires et les résultats cliniques. Méthodes: Cette étude comporte 44 hommes et 91 femmes (âge moyen=61, intervalle 24-90 ans). Les diamètres, longueurs et trajectoires des 836 vis ont été planifiés en préopératoire avec un système de navigation (SNN, Surgical Navigation Network, Mississauga). Les patients ont subi une fusion lombaire (55), lombo-sacrée (73) et thoraco-lombo-sacrée (7). La perforation pédiculaire, la longueur des vis et les spondylolisthesis sont évalués par tomographies axiales postopératoires. Le niveau de douleur est mesuré par autoévaluations, échelles visuelles analogues et questionnaires (Oswestry et SF-36). La fusion osseuse a été évaluée par l’examen des radiographies postopératoires. Résultats: Une perforation des pédicules est présente pour 49/836 (5.9%) des vis (2.4% latéral, 1.7% inférieur, 1.1% supérieur, 0.7% médial). Les erreurs ont été mineures (0.1-2mm, 46/49) ou intermédiaires (2.1 - 4mm, 3/49 en latéral). Il y a aucune erreur majeure (≥ 4.1mm). Certaines vis ont été jugées trop longues (66/836, 8%). Le temps moyen pour insérer une vis en navigation a été de 19.1 minutes de l΄application au retrait du cadre de référence. Un an postopératoire on note une amélioration de la douleur des jambes et lombaire de 72% et 48% en moyenne respectivement. L’amélioration reste stable après 2 ans. La dégénérescence radiologique au dessus et sous la fusion a été retrouvée chez 44 patients (33%) and 3 patients respectivement (2%). Elle est survenue en moyenne 22.2 ± 2.6 mois après la chirurgie. Les fusions se terminant à L2 ont été associées à plus de dégénération (14/25, 56%). Conclusion: La navigation spinale basée sur des images tomographiques préopératoires est une technique sécuritaire et précise. Elle donne de bons résultats à court terme justifiant l’investissement de temps chirurgical. La dégénérescence segmentaire peut avoir un impact négatif sur les résultats radiologique et cliniques. / Objective: The authors studied 135 consecutive patients following a lumbo-sacral fixation using pedicle screws and CT-based navigation to evaluate pedicle screw accuracy and clinical outcomes. Methods: The series included 44 men and 91 women (mean age 61 years, range 24-90 years). All 836 screws were planned with pre-operative CT-Scans in a navigation system (SNN, Surgical Navigation Network, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) for diameter, length and direction. Fixation included the lumbar spines only (55), the lumbo-sacral spine (73) or the thoraco-lumbo-sacral spine (7). Pedicle perforation, screw length and spondylolisthesis were assessed on post-operative CT-Scan. Pain was surveyed using self-rated scales, visual analogue scales, Oswestry and SF-36 questionnaires. Bony union was assessed on post-operative follow-up radiographs. Results: Pedicle perforation was found in 49/836 (5.9%) screws (2.4% laterally, 1.7% inferiorly, 1.1% superiorly, 0.7% medially). The errors were minor (0.1-2mm, 46/49) or intermediate (2.1 – 4 mm, 3/49). All intermediate errors were lateral. There were no major errors (≥ 4.1mm). Some screws were judged too long (66/836, 8%). The average time to insert one screw with navigation was 19.1 minutes from application to removal of the reference frame. The amount of improvement at one year post-operation for self-rated leg and back pain were 72% and 48% respectively. The improvement was stable over 2 years. Above-level and below-level radiological degenerations were found in 44 patients (33%) and 3 patients respectively (2%) and occurred on average 22.2 ± 2.6 months after the surgery. Fusions ending at L2 had the most degenerations (14/25, 56%). Conclusion: CT-based preoperative navigation for lumbo-sacral pedicle screw insertion is accurate and associated with a good short term outcome, making it worth the investment of the additional time required. Segmental degeneration may have a negative effect on radiological and clinical outcomes.