[Truncated abstract] There have been few studies into the effects of rehabilitation following lumbar microdiscectomy and consequently little evidence of its effect, if any, on outcome. Most studies cited fall into one of two categories: research involving a spinal surgery procedure without rehabilitation, or research involving spinal surgery with a nonspecific generic 'rehabilitation' or 'physical therapy'. In an era of evidence based medicine the efficacy of specific rehabilitation protocols following defined lumbar spine surgical procedures needs to be established for surgeons, therapists and patients to have confidence that the rehabilitation is appropriate and effective. The study was proposed to investigate the outcome of a specific and novel rehabilitation protocol commenced immediately after lumbar microdiscectomy. Data collected from the research cohort were compared to data collected from a contrast group who underwent standard rehabilitation at a distant site. A retrospective study (Phase One) was carried out with a cohort of post-operative microdiscectomy patients between February 2000 and December 2002. The outcome of surgery followed by the rehabilitation protocol was assessed using validated outcome instruments. A contrast or control group was not included. After reviewing the data limitations with the design and implementation of the study were identified. A prospective study (Phase Two) was proposed and changes made in the principal outcome measure used, in the demographic data to be retrieved, the addition of pain scales, and in the exclusion of compensable patients. A contrast group was included for the prospective study. ... The study group commenced exercise and posture correction the day following surgery. There were restrictions placed on activity involving bending. The contrast group followed the advice of the surgeon in Queensland and attended rehabilitation at local physiotherapy facilities. Both groups were followed for 12 months using outcome instruments. Strict comparison between WA and QLD cohorts were limited due to sample size, however trends were observed. Data of the prospective study showed that there was greater reduction in back pain with the early rehabilitation protocol (P<.0001) compared to standard rehabilitation (P=.09), while there was no difference between groups in leg pain. There was a significant improvement in the level of functional disability between time-points for the WA cohort, and overall change from pre-operative RMQ measures to 12 months in both groups were statistically significant. The WA group was less reliant on pain medication and was more satisfied with the results of their surgery. The primary hypothesis of this study that there would be a difference in outcome following lumbar microdiscectomy in patients who receive early specific rehabilitation compared to those who receive standard rehabilitation at another centre, was supported in both primary and secondary outcome data. The key finding of this study was that commencing the early exercise protocol resulted in significantly less back pain over the 12 month time period of the study. Other major findings were that the WA cohort demonstrated significant improvement in function at all time-points and between all time-points except six to 12 months, took less pain medication and were more satisfied with the outcome of their surgery than the QLD cohort.

Thesis (M.CM)--Hong Kong Baptist University, 2006. / Dissertation submitted to the School of Chinese Medicine. Includes bibliographical references (leaf 53).

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karol. inst., 2002. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Thesis (M.Sc.). / Written for the Dept. of Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Title from title page of PDF (viewed 2009/06/29). Includes bibliographical references.

O sistema de fixação vertebral utilizando o parafuso pedicular é um dos métodos mais eficientes no tratamento de patologias da coluna vertebral. Quando o parafuso estiver submetido à força de arrancamento, ele gera tensões ao redor, principalmente próximo do canal medular, situação que pode ser analisada pela técnica da fotoelasticidade. O objetivo foi analisar as tensões internas geradas em modelos fotoelásticos de vértebras, utilizando diferentes medidas de parafusos do sistema de fixação vertebral, submetidos à força de arrancamento. Foi utilizado um modelo de vértebra lombar em material fotoelástico utilizando três medidas de diâmetros externos de parafusos pediculares (5, 6 e 7mm) do tipo USS1. As tensões internas ao redor do parafuso foram avaliadas em 18 pontos pré-determinados utilizando um polariscópio de transmissão plana. As regiões de maiores concentrações de tensões foram observadas entre o canal medular e as curvas do processo transverso. Nas comparações das médias das tensões cisalhantes entre os parafusos 5 e 7mm, e 6 e 7mm foram observadas diferenças estatísticas significativas, o que não ocorreu com os parafusos de 5 e 6mm onde não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Foi observado que as tensões internas são mais elevadas em áreas irregulares próximas do canal medular, o que sugere ser uma região crítica, em termos de esforços mecânicos. / The system of vertebrae fixation using the pedicular screw is one of the most efficient methods to treat vertebral spine pathologies. When the screw is submitted to pullout strength, it causes internal stress near the medullary canal and this situation can be analyzed using the photoelasticity technique. The objective of this study was to examine the internal stress of a photoelastic vertebrae model using different sizes of screws for the vertebral fixation submitted to pulling out. A lumbar vertebral model made of photoelastic material with three different pedicular screw sizes (5, 6 and 7mm), type USS1 was used. The internal stress around the screw were tested in 18 pre established points by a plain transmission polariscope. The areas of greater concentration of stress were placed between the medullary canal and the transverse process. Comparing the maximum average pulling out stress, statistical differences were observed between screws 5 and 7, and 6 and 7. On the other hand, when screws 5 and 6mm where compared no significant differences were found. This study identified that the internal stress are greater in irregular areas, near the medullary canal, suggesting that this may be a critical region.

Orientador: João Batista de Miranda / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-21T07:18:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cavali_PauloTadeuMaia_D.pdf: 2639722 bytes, checksum: 55b4478f11151611236860d14a52b44f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012 / Resumo: Existe uma grande variabilidade de resultados nos estudos prévios que analisam os parâmetros do alinhamento sagital (PAS) em indivíduos normais e em pacientes com doenças degenerativas da coluna lombar. A maioria desses estudos relacionam os PAS somente com o sintoma de dor lombar crônica, em grupos de pacientes com diferentes doenças degenerativas lombares, o que dificulta a aplicação clínica desses dados tanto na avaliação diagnóstica como na indicação terapêutica. O objetivo deste estudo caso-controle foi analisar as relações dos PAS com os diferentes sintomas entre um grupo de pacientes com diagnóstico de estenose lombar e um grupo controle e as mesmas relações entre os subgrupos de pacientes diferenciados por sintoma. Foram colhidos os dados da história, exame clínico, ressonância magnética e de exames radiográficos de 23 pacientes com estenose lombar (denominado grupo estenose) e de 17 indivíduos saudáveis (denominado grupo controle). Os PAS utilizados foram: cifose torácica (CT), lordose lombar (LL), eixo sagital vertical (C7-T1), listese anteroposterior (OAP), lordose lombo-pélvica total (LLT) e regional (LLR), eixo sagital em T1, T4 eT9 (ES1, ES4 e ES9 respectivamente), inclinação sagital T1-L5 (IST1-L5), "offset sagital" T1 e T9 (OST1 e OST9), "tilt pélvico" (TP), "slope sacral" (SS), morfologia pélvica (MP), ângulo sacro-femoral (ASF), distância sacro-femoral (DSF) e "overhang" (OVHG). Na Fase 1 do estudo, os dados do PAS foram correlacionados entre os indivíduos do grupo controle e grupo estenose e, na Fase 2, entre os subgrupos do grupo estenose diferenciados por sintomas como lombalgia, radiculopatia, claudicação neurogênica e dor, medida pela Escala Analógica de Dor (EAD). Na Fase 1, observou-se que os pacientes do Grupo Estenose (GE) como um todo tiveram menores valores de LLT (p = 0,006) e LLR em L1, L2 e L3 (p = 0,026) e os pacientes do GE com sintoma de radiculopatia, além dos dados acima, tiveram aumento do TP (p = 0,004), quando comparados ao Grupo Controle (GC). Na Fase 2, o Subgrupo Lombalgia obteve maiores valores de CT (p = 0,035) e LLR (p = 0,028) e uma diminuição do TP (p = 0,029), OST1 (p = 0,022), DSF (p = 0,014) e OVHG (p = 0,035) em relação aos outros pacientes do GE que não se queixavam de lombalgia e, no Subgrupo Radiculopatia, houve a diminuição da LLR (p < 0,047). Este estudo demonstra que há correlações significativas dos sintomas e dos PAS entre o GE e o GC e também entre os Subgrupos do GE diferenciados por sintomas. Estes dados indicam uma melhor interpretação clínica dos PAS, assim como podem sugerir a terapêutica mais adequada / Abstract: There is a great variation in the results of previous studies analyzing sagital alignment parameters (SAP) in normal individuals and in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Most studies associate SAP only with chronic lumbar pain, in groups of patients with different lumbar degenerative diseases, which makes it difficult to apply these data clinically both in diagnostic evaluation and in therapeutics. The objective of this prospective, diagnostic case-control study was to examine the relationship between sagittal balance parameters and different symptoms of spine disease in patients with lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) and controls and the same associations between subgroups of patients with different symptoms. We collected clinical history, clinical exam data from 23 patients with spinal stenosis and 17 healthy volunteers (controls). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and x-rays allowed the measurement of sagittal axis parameters. The SAP analyzed were thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal axis, anterior-posterior listesis, total and regional lumbar-pelvic lordosis, sagittal axis in T1, T4 and T9, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic morphology, sacro-femoral angle, sacro-femoral distance and overhang. In the first phase of the study, SAP data were correlated between controls and patients, and in the second phase, the subgroups inside the group of patients with stenosis were compared for symptoms as lumbar pain, radiculopathy, neurogenic claudication and pain, measure by the visual analogue scale (VAS). In the first phase, it was observed that the stenosis patients presented lower values of total lumbopelvic lordosis (p = 0.006) and regional lordosis L1, L2 and L3 (p < 0.026). Those with stenosis and radiculopathy also had higher values of pelvic tilt (p = 0.004) and lower values for total lumbopelvic lordosis and regional lordosis in L1 and L2 (p < 0.05) than controls. All patients complaining of back pain had higher values of thoracic kyphosis (p = 0.035), regional lumbopelvic lordosis in L1 (p = 0.028), lower values for pelvic tilt (p = 0.029), sagittal T1 offset (p = 0.022), sacro-femoral distance (p = 0.014) and overhang (p = 0.035) compared to patients without the complaint. Patients with stenosis and radiculopathy were less prone to have regional lordosis in L2, L3 and L4 (p = 0.047, p = 0.047 and p = 0.023 respectively). In conclusion, this study shows that there are significant correlations between symptoms and sagittal axis parameters between patients with and without spinal canal stenosis and also in subgroups of the patients with stenosis with different complaints.These data indicate a better clinical interpretation of SAP, as well as suggest a better therapeutic approach / Doutorado / Cirurgia / Doutor em Cirurgia

M.Tech. (Chiropractic) / Purpose: Low back pain affects the general population worldwide. Low back pain is a multi-factorial problem with debate as to the exact aetiology of low back pain. Thus, this study examines the relationship between lumbar spine lordosis, body fat percentage, physical activity level, lumbar spine range of motion and the incidence of low back pain. Method: There was a total of one hundred female participants between and including eighteen and thirty-five years of age. These females were symptomatic or asymptomatic of mechanical low back pain. Potential candidates were examined and accepted based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were evaluated once. No treatment was administered. Procedure: Subjective responses were acquired through the Visual Analog Scale, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and an Oswestry Low Back Pain and Disability Questionnaire. The objective evaluation included a physical examination and a lumbar spine regional examination. The participant’s height was measured using a stadiometer. The Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) measured the participant’s weight, water content, lean tissue mass and body fat percentage. BMI was calculated from the weight and height recordings. Range of motion of the lumbar spine was measured with a Digital Inclinometer. A flexi curve ruler molded the lumbar spine lordosis of each participant, which was then traced onto a piece of paper to measure the magnitude of lumbar spine lordosis. Results: A clinical relationship did not exist between a hyperlordotic lumbar spine posture, the incidence of low back pain, body fat percentage and lumbar spine range of motion. A clinical relationship was evident between a hyperlordotic lumbar spine posture and the level of physical activity. Conclusion: Given that a clinical relationship exists between a hyperlordotic lumbar spine posture and the level of physical activity, physical activity specifically exercise to strengthen the abdominal muscles should be included in a treatment protocol to reduce the degree of lumbar spine lordosis if the degree is excessive.

No description available.

No description available.

M.Tech. / According to the “Lovett Reactor” as explained by Walther (2000), the Atlas and the 5th lumbar vertebrae rotate in the same direction when a person walks. This relationship continues throughout the spinal column as 3rd cervical vertebrae (C3) rotates in the same direction as 3rd lumbar vertebrae (L3). From this point the movement changes to counter-rotation as 4th cervical vertebrae (C4) counter-rotates to 2nd lumbar vertebrae (L2) and 5th cervical vertebrae (C5) to 1st lumbar vertebrae (L1). According to Inman, Ralston and Todd (1981) this correlation extends as the Sacrum reacts with the Occiput. Thus, there is clinical verification demonstrating that the Lovett Reactor vertebrae are often interrelated to primary and compensatory subluxations. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Chiropractic Occipital adjustments versus Chiropractic Sacroiliac adjustments in the treatment of chronic Lumbar Sacral pain.