The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and findings of antimalarial drug efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia and to use the findings to formulate recommendations for antimalarial drug efficacy monitoring and use of evidence to inform antimalarial treatment policy for the Ethiopian setting. This study reviewed 44 antimalarial efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia from 1974 to 2011. The analysis of results indicated that chloroquine as the first-line antimalarial drug for the treatment of malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum had a 22% therapeutic failure in 1985. Chloroquine was replaced with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in 1998, more than 12 years later, when its therapeutic failure had reached 65%. Sulfadoxinepyrimethamine at the time of its introduction had a treatment failure of 7.7%; it was replaced after seven years in 2004 by artemether-lumefantrine; by then its treatment failure had reached 36%. The WHO recommends the replacement of a first-line antimalarial drug when more than 10% of treatment failure is reported. The replacement drug should have a therapeutic efficacy of more than 95%; while the change itself should be completed within two years. The prolonged delay to replace failing antimalarial drugs in Ethiopia seems to have been influenced mainly by the lack of systematic antimalarial drug efficacy data collection and pragmatic use of the data and evidence gathered.Almost eight years after its introduction, isolated studies show that the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine has decreased from 99% in 2003 to around 96.3% in 2008. Though this decrease is not statistically significant (chi-square 1.5; P=0.22) and has not reached the threshold of 10%, it is plausible that its efficacy may drop further. This is mainly due to regulatory provisions in the country that allow marketing of oral artemisinin mono-therapies that are not recommended for malaria treatment, use of less effective antimalarial combination drugs in the neighboring countries and widespread drug quality problems. The situation calls for and this study recommends the establishment of stringent drug efficacy monitoring and early warning system and alignment of the antimalarial drug regulatory practices with recommendations of the WHO. / Health Studies / D. Litt. et Phil. (Health Studies)

The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and findings of antimalarial drug efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia and to use the findings to formulate recommendations for antimalarial drug efficacy monitoring and use of evidence to inform antimalarial treatment policy for the Ethiopian setting. This study reviewed 44 antimalarial efficacy studies conducted in Ethiopia from 1974 to 2011. The analysis of results indicated that chloroquine as the first-line antimalarial drug for the treatment of malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum had a 22% therapeutic failure in 1985. Chloroquine was replaced with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in 1998, more than 12 years later, when its therapeutic failure had reached 65%. Sulfadoxinepyrimethamine at the time of its introduction had a treatment failure of 7.7%; it was replaced after seven years in 2004 by artemether-lumefantrine; by then its treatment failure had reached 36%. The WHO recommends the replacement of a first-line antimalarial drug when more than 10% of treatment failure is reported. The replacement drug should have a therapeutic efficacy of more than 95%; while the change itself should be completed within two years. The prolonged delay to replace failing antimalarial drugs in Ethiopia seems to have been influenced mainly by the lack of systematic antimalarial drug efficacy data collection and pragmatic use of the data and evidence gathered.Almost eight years after its introduction, isolated studies show that the efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine has decreased from 99% in 2003 to around 96.3% in 2008. Though this decrease is not statistically significant (chi-square 1.5; P=0.22) and has not reached the threshold of 10%, it is plausible that its efficacy may drop further. This is mainly due to regulatory provisions in the country that allow marketing of oral artemisinin mono-therapies that are not recommended for malaria treatment, use of less effective antimalarial combination drugs in the neighboring countries and widespread drug quality problems. The situation calls for and this study recommends the establishment of stringent drug efficacy monitoring and early warning system and alignment of the antimalarial drug regulatory practices with recommendations of the WHO. / Health Studies / D. Litt. et Phil. (Health Studies)