Spelling suggestions: "subject:"managemement"" "subject:"managementment""
391 |
Benefits and Constraints of Gap YearQian, Rui 16 December 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
392 |
DESTINATION IMAGE, RISK PERCEPTION AND THE UNITED STATES AS AN EDUCATIONAL DESTINATION FOR CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTSQUAN, GUI 16 December 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
393 |
Principles of Scientific Management (Taylorism) with Applications to Certain Phases of Public School AdministrationMallett, Carlos Welcome January 1933 (has links)
No description available.
|
394 |
Application of Addends to Occupational ClassificationBass, Bernard Morris January 1947 (has links)
No description available.
|
395 |
The Construction of a Rating Scale for Clerical WorkersBeacham, Samuel Turner January 1947 (has links)
No description available.
|
396 |
Career Decision Making among Young Generations in ChinaLiang, Yuan 14 December 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
397 |
The influences of power and resources on flexibilities in a supply chain contextJin, Yan January 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
398 |
Challenges in the Global Supply Chain: Exploitation versus Exploration StrategyAsree, Susita 14 June 2010 (has links)
No description available.
|
399 |
DIFFERENTIATED EMPOWERING LEADERSHIP IN GROUPS: AN EXAMINATION OF ITS CONSEQUENCESHan, Soojung January 2019 (has links)
To date, research on the effectiveness of empowering leadership at the team level has focused on cases in which leaders empower the team as a whole, and team members perceive their leaders’ empowering behaviors to the same extent. Because the existing literature predominantly examines empowering leadership directed toward an entire team, little is known about how differentiated levels of empowering leadership within a single team (i.e., differentiated empowering leadership) influence team performance. In the present study, I develop a theoretical model to delineate the consequences of differentiated empowering leadership, defined as the within-group variance of empowering leadership, at the team level. Integrating social categorization theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987) into the AMO model (Appelbaum, Bailey, Berg, & Kalleberg, 2000), I examine the curvilinear indirect effects of differentiated empowering leadership on team performance via team potency, team commitment, and team autonomy, and the moderating effect of procedural justice of leaders’ empowering differentiation and team-level empowering leadership on the curvilinear indirect effects. I conducted a three-wave study, with a sample of 99 teams and their team leader from 22 firms in South Korea to test the research model. Results suggest that (1) differentiated empowering leadership had a negative curvilinear indirect effect on team performance via team potency, and that (2) both procedural justice of differentiation and team-level empowering leadership positively moderated the curvilinear effect of differentiated empowering leadership on team potency, team commitment, and team autonomy. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, along with limitations and directions for future research. / Business Administration/Human Resource Management
|
400 |
Two essays in financial economicsJo, Evan January 2022 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0814 seconds