Thesis (Ph. D.)--Yale University.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Yale University.

No description available.

Issued also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University. / Bibliography: p. [211]-218.

Issued also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University. / Bibliography: p. [211]-218.

Proefschrift - Leyden. / Includes bibliographical references.

Proefschrift - Leyden. / Includes bibliographical references.

Issued also as Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University. / Includes index. Bibliographical note (p. 327-334).

The purpose of my thesis is to study the lament in ancient Greek culture, and to show how its ritual meaning is interpreted by literature. The terms goos, oimoge, threnos and linos not only indicate the presence of different ritual attitudes to death but also the existence of different interpretations for each of them. The goos and the oimoge mirror an archaic religiosity and consist of sinister utterances aimed at summoning ghosts, requesting for divine revenge, etc. Aeschylus introduces them as aischrologic acts as he implies the presence of a god or a daimon. Sophocles and Euripides use them as dysphemic elements and censure an approach to death which implies that gods are vindictive, deceitful and unjust. However, they also introduce an euphemic goos consisting in an expression of feelings. The threnos only appears in funerary contexts in Homer while is often introduced as dysphemic in drama. The linos-song is mentioned as a vintage-song in Homer, it appears as a lament and then as a song for some hero’s apotheosis or return to life in drama. The poetic use of these terms serves to understand how the social and political meaning of the ritual was understood and codified by literature.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Catholic University of America, 1937. / Bibliography: p. 262-274.