• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Classification using residual vector quantization

Ali Khan, Syed Irteza 13 January 2014 (has links)
Residual vector quantization (RVQ) is a 1-nearest neighbor (1-NN) type of technique. RVQ is a multi-stage implementation of regular vector quantization. An input is successively quantized to the nearest codevector in each stage codebook. In classification, nearest neighbor techniques are very attractive since these techniques very accurately model the ideal Bayes class boundaries. However, nearest neighbor classification techniques require a large size of representative dataset. Since in such techniques a test input is assigned a class membership after an exhaustive search the entire training set, a reasonably large training set can make the implementation cost of the nearest neighbor classifier unfeasibly costly. Although, the k-d tree structure offers a far more efficient implementation of 1-NN search, however, the cost of storing the data points can become prohibitive, especially in higher dimensionality. RVQ also offers a nice solution to a cost-effective implementation of 1-NN-based classification. Because of the direct-sum structure of the RVQ codebook, the memory and computational of cost 1-NN-based system is greatly reduced. Although, as compared to an equivalent 1-NN system, the multi-stage implementation of the RVQ codebook compromises the accuracy of the class boundaries, yet the classification error has been empirically shown to be within 3% to 4% of the performance of an equivalent 1-NN-based classifier.

Page generated in 0.0558 seconds