No description available.

Many diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer and diabetes, originate from several malfunctions in biological systems. The human body is regulated by a wide range of biological systems, composed of biological entities interacting in complex networks, responsible for carrying out specific functions. Some parts of the networks, such as hubs serving as master regulators, are more important for maintaining a function. To find the cause of diseases, where hubs are possible disease regulators, it is critical to know the structure of these biological systems. Such structures can be reverse engineered from high-throughput data with measured levels of biological entities. However, the complexity of biological systems makes inferring their structure a complicated task, demanding the use of computational methods, called network inference methods. Today, many network inference methods have been developed, that predicts the interactions of biological networks, with varying degree of success. In the DREAM5 challenge 35 network inference methods were evaluated on how well interactions in gene regulatory networks (GRNs) were predicted. Herein, in contrast to the DREAM5 challenge, we have evaluated network inference methods’ ability to predict hubs in GRNs. In accordance with the DREAM5 challenge, different methods performed the best on different data sets. Moreover, we discovered that network inference methods were not able to identify hubs from groups of similarly expressed genes. Also, we noticed that hubs in GRNs had a distinct expression in the data, leading to the development of a new method (the PCA method) for the prediction of hubs. Furthermore, the DREAM5 challenge showed that community predictions, combining the predictions from many network inference methods, resulted in more robust predictions of interactions. Herein, the community approach was applied on predicting hubs, with the conclusion that community predictions is the more robust approach. However, we also concluded that it was enough to combine 6-7 network inference methods to achieve robust predictions of hubs.