Delayed bathing of the newborn infant for twenty-four hours after birth can decrease potential newborn complications such as hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and improve the infants skin integrity and breastfeeding rates. The primary purpose of this literature review was to examine the health benefits of delaying initial bathing in newborns for twenty-four hours. A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using peer-reviewed, research articles from multiple databases focusing on delayed infant bathing after birth and health benefits. 15 articles met the inclusion criteria and answered the research questions. Two studies showed the effects of vernix caseosa on improved skin integrity and moisture in infants. Two additional studies revealed longer skin-to-skin contact with increased maternal satisfaction and comfort, allowing time for breastfeeding and sucking competence. Delayed bathing prevented hypothermia and decreased the incidence of hypoglycemia. All articles focused on infants’ health outcomes within hours of birth and physiologic findings of how delayed bathing can improve the infant’s adjustment to extrauterine environment. Delayed bathing in the neonate decreases the risk of hypoglycemia and hypothermia. Prolonging the time an infant remains covered in their mother’s vernix caseosa following birth is a viable measure for improving newborn health outcomes.

Exposure to incarceration through a partner or first-hand experience can lead to a higher probability of negative outcomes on either infant or maternal well-being postpartum. This can be measured by length of pregnancy, infant birth weight, and maternal depression screening. The purpose of this literature review was to identify the impact of incarceration on maternal and infant outcomes for women exposed to incarceration at some point during the length of their pregnancy. A comprehensive review of the literature using peer reviewed research articles from multiple databases on maternal and infant outcome disparities in pregnant incarcerated women. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and focused on the research question. Of the 17 studies, 12 showed a negative impact on either infant or maternal outcomes. Four studies were inconclusive. One study found no negative impact of exposure to incarceration on either maternal or infant outcomes. Exposure to incarceration does provide some negative effects on infant/maternal outcomes, at this time, the effects are under researched and require further investigation to determine if this risk factor is more strongly correlated with negative outcomes when compared to other similar life-stress events.

We explored the role that exogenous and endogenous competitors for attention play in infants’ abilities to encode and retain information over a 6‐month period. Sixty‐six children visited the laboratory at 15 months, and 32 returned for a second visit at 21 months. Children observed models of conventional‐ relation and enabling‐relation action sequences. Half the children were distracted by a “Mister Monkey” mechanical toy during the conventional‐relation sequence, while the other half was distracted during the enabling‐relation sequence. The Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire indexed endogenous factors at both ages. Immediate postmodel production of target actions indexed encoding efficiency, and 6‐month production of target actions indexed long‐term recall. The exogenous distracter impacted encoding efficiency (i.e., immediate recall), but not long‐term recall. Endogenous factors (i.e., temperament) were primarily associated with long‐term recall. Of special interest was our finding that endogenous factors, especially surgency, moderated the effect of the exogenous distracter. It appears that when learning conventional‐relation sequences in the presence of exogenous distracters, surgency mobilizes attentional resources toward the learning objective; however, when learning enabling‐relation sequences under the same conditions, surgency either boosts the saliency of the distracters or boosts children’s susceptibility to them.

While Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Disorder is a recognized problem with alcohol ingestion during the formation of facial features, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders are not as widely recognized. These disorders result from exposure to alcohol throughout pregnancy when the brain and nervous system are developing. The resulting disorders include attention deficit disorders, social disorders, inappropriate behaviors, learning disorders, and intellectual disability. The incidence of children with alcohol-related disorders is increasing as evidenced by children needing special services in the educational systems. It is unknown how much alcohol ingestion is safe during pregnancy or how genetic factors are involved in the development of these disorders. Women often get conflicting information from the media and other resources about safe levels of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Abstinence of alcohol ingestion is the only known prevention of such intellectual disorders. It is hypothesized that women of childbearing age may not be knowledgeable of the relationship between drinking and the implications of alcohol exposure on fetal development. The purpose of this research is to determine what women of childbearing age know about alcohol consumption during pregnancy and if there is a knowledge deficit that exists among women of a certain age or women that use specific resources for health information. The researcher surveyed 40 female students at East Tennessee State University by using true or false questions concerning alcohol consumption related to fetal development in order to determine if a knowledge deficit exists. Based on the findings, it may be determined if women of childbearing age need educational materials from a reliable source.

The objectives of this study were to determine whether there was an association between clinical nursing knowledge of four birthing positions and current evidence-based research of those same positions and also to identify possible areas where nursing knowledge of those birthing positions was inadequate. This pilot study used convenience sampling to survey registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) on labor and delivery units. The survey was distributed to three hospitals in the southeastern United States, and twenty-four RNs and LPNs participated. Participants’ knowledge did not reflect current clinical evidence in two key areas, (1) the best position to minimize blood loss and (2) the best position to decrease the likelihood anal sphincter tears. Respectively, only 13% and 27.3% of participants selected the correct position. Continuing education for maternity nurses regarding current evidence-based practice concerning various birthing positions remains a need, and incorporating this could include more frequent opportunities for education classes and unit inservices. Results from this study should not be generalized, and more research is needed in this area to validate these findings.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.