Mathematical argumentation is fundamental to doing mathematics and developing new knowledge. Working from the view that mathematical argumentation is also integral to teaching and learning mathematics, this study investigated teachers’ use of mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) to support student participation in mathematical argumentation. Classroom observations were made of three case-study teachers’ implementation of a three-day curriculum unit on mathematical argumentation and supplemented with paper and pencil assessments of teachers’ MKT. Teaching moves, or teachers’ actions directed toward supporting argumentation, were identified as a unit of discourse in which MKT-in-action appeared. Teachers’ MKT showed up in three types of teaching moves including: Revoicing by Reformulation, Responding to Student Difficulties, and Pressing for Generalization in Defining. MKT that was evident in these moves included knowledge of core information in argument, heuristic methods, and vii formulation of mathematical definition through and in argumentation. Findings highlight that supporting mathematical argumentation requires teachers to have a sophisticated understanding of the subject matter as well as how concepts develop through argumentation. Findings have limitations in understanding complex teaching practices by considering MKT as a single factor. The study has implications on teacher learning and MKT assessments. / text

Orientador: Miriam Godoy Penteado / Banca: João Pedro Mendes da Ponte / Banca: Marcelo de Carvalho Borba / Banca: Maria Elizabeth Bianconcini Trindade Morato Pinto de Almeida / Banca: Vani Moreira Kenski / Resumo: A presente pesquisa analisa a natureza da aprendizagem matemática em um curso online de formação continuada de professores, denominado Geometria com Geometricks. Nele, alunos-professores de uma mesma rede de escolas, situadas em diferentes localidades do país, desenvolveram atividades de Geometria utilizando-se do software Geometricks, e se encontravam para discuti-las. Esses encontros aconteceram a distância, em tempo real, por chat ou videoconferência. Nessa proposta pedagógica, a telepresença condicionou a comunicação e oportunizou o estar-junto-virtual-com-mídias. De modo singular, os recursos da videoconferência permitiram que construções geométricas fossem compartilhadas visualmente e realizadas por todos os envolvidos, fomentando a interação e a participação ativa, constituindo, por meio do diálogo, uma comunidade virtual de aprendizagem. Os resultados levam a inferir que, nesse contexto, a aprendizagem matemática teve natureza colaborativa, na virtualidade das discussões, tecidas a partir das contribuições de todos os participantes; coletiva, na medida em que a produção matemática era condicionada pelo coletivo pensante de seres-humanos-com-mídias; e argumentativa, uma vez que conjecturas e justificativas matemáticas se desenvolveram intensamente do decorrer do processo, contando para isso com as tecnologias presentes na interação ocorrida de forma constante e colaborativa. / Abstract: This study was conducted to analyze the nature of mathematical learning in an online continuing education course for teachers entitled Geometry with Geometricks. Teachers employed in a nation-wide network of privately-supported schools developed geometry activities using the software Geometricks and discussed them in virtual meetings, in real time, via chat or video-conference. In this pedagogical proposal, tele-presence conditioned the communication and provided the opportunity for virtual-togetherness-with-media. In a unique way, the resources of the videoconference made it possible for everyone to participate in and visually share geometrical constructions, encouraging interaction and active participation and constituting a virtual learning community through dialogue. The results indicate that, in this context, mathematical learning nature was characterized by: collaboration, in the virtual discussions that were woven from the contributions of all the participants; collectivity, to the degree to which mathematical production was conditioned by the humans-with-media thinking collective; and argumentation, as the development of mathematical conjectures and justifications was intense throughout the process, aided by the technologies that were present in the constant, collaborative interaction. / Doutor

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:31:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2007-03-30Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:42:46Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 zulatto_rba_dr_rcla.pdf: 1418316 bytes, checksum: 8cfc1b5fe211e92399513a0cac71bc8b (MD5) / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) / A presente pesquisa analisa a natureza da aprendizagem matemática em um curso online de formação continuada de professores, denominado Geometria com Geometricks. Nele, alunos-professores de uma mesma rede de escolas, situadas em diferentes localidades do país, desenvolveram atividades de Geometria utilizando-se do software Geometricks, e se encontravam para discuti-las. Esses encontros aconteceram a distância, em tempo real, por chat ou videoconferência. Nessa proposta pedagógica, a telepresença condicionou a comunicação e oportunizou o estar-junto-virtual-com-mídias. De modo singular, os recursos da videoconferência permitiram que construções geométricas fossem compartilhadas visualmente e realizadas por todos os envolvidos, fomentando a interação e a participação ativa, constituindo, por meio do diálogo, uma comunidade virtual de aprendizagem. Os resultados levam a inferir que, nesse contexto, a aprendizagem matemática teve natureza colaborativa, na virtualidade das discussões, tecidas a partir das contribuições de todos os participantes; coletiva, na medida em que a produção matemática era condicionada pelo coletivo pensante de seres-humanos-com-mídias; e argumentativa, uma vez que conjecturas e justificativas matemáticas se desenvolveram intensamente do decorrer do processo, contando para isso com as tecnologias presentes na interação ocorrida de forma constante e colaborativa. / This study was conducted to analyze the nature of mathematical learning in an online continuing education course for teachers entitled Geometry with Geometricks. Teachers employed in a nation-wide network of privately-supported schools developed geometry activities using the software Geometricks and discussed them in virtual meetings, in real time, via chat or video-conference. In this pedagogical proposal, tele-presence conditioned the communication and provided the opportunity for virtual-togetherness-with-media. In a unique way, the resources of the videoconference made it possible for everyone to participate in and visually share geometrical constructions, encouraging interaction and active participation and constituting a virtual learning community through dialogue. The results indicate that, in this context, mathematical learning nature was characterized by: collaboration, in the virtual discussions that were woven from the contributions of all the participants; collectivity, to the degree to which mathematical production was conditioned by the humans-with-media thinking collective; and argumentation, as the development of mathematical conjectures and justifications was intense throughout the process, aided by the technologies that were present in the constant, collaborative interaction.

I aim to describe how teachers' beliefs and practices influence the way mathematical argumentation is conducted in lower secondary mathematics classroom within the Czech curricular context. I present results of two studies: the first one characterises the Czech curricular context, namely, the national curricular document and aspects of justification of mathematical statements in selected series of mathematics textbooks. The second study reports on characteristics of teachers' beliefs and practices as related to argumentation on an example of six purposefully selected teachers, via interviews and observations of their lessons. Finally, I select three teachers with differing approaches to teaching and describe specific observed instances in their practices in relation to classroom norms regarding argumentation, justification of general mathematical truths, and aspects of arguments. I show how teachers' beliefs, a textbook and pupils may influence the observed arguments. The studies show that a teachers' emphasis on efficiency (fulfilling school curriculum demands) on one hand and on sense-making on the other lead to distinct implemented curricula. The curricular context and teachers' practice analysis suggest that justification of general truths is generally seen as important but without clear cognitive aims...