Objectives This study is a follow-up to previous research regarding buprenorphine medication-assisted therapy (MAT) in Johnson City, Tennessee. For-profit MAT clinics were surveyed to determine changes in tapering practice patterns and insurance coverage during the last 3 years. Methods Johnson City for-profit MAT clinics; also called office based opioid treatment centers, were surveyed by telephone. Clinic representatives were asked questions regarding patient costs for therapy, insurance coverage, counseling offered onsite, and opportunities for tapering while pregnant. Results All of the MAT clinics representatives indicated that tapering in pregnancy could be considered even though tapering in pregnancy is contrary to current national guidelines. Forty-three percent of the clinics now accept insurance as compared with 0% in the 2016 study. The average weekly cost per visit remained consistent. Conclusions The concept of tapering buprenorphine during pregnancy appears to have become a standard of care for this community, as representatives state it is offered at all of the clinics that were contacted. Representatives from three clinics stated the clinics require tapering, even though national organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Addiction Medicine do not recommend this approach. Although patients who have government or other insurance are now able to obtain buprenorphine with no expense at numerous clinics, the high cost for uninsured patients continues to create an environment conducive to buprenorphine diversion.

Objectives Many addicted pregnant patients receiving buprenorphine medication-assisted therapy (MAT) wish to discontinue this medication while pregnant. This study was undertaken to determine whether outpatient detoxification from buprenorphine during pregnancy is safe and effective when confirmed with postdetoxification urine drug screens (UDSs). Methods This case series reports the maternal and neonatal outcomes for 21 patients who ended MAT with buprenorphine while pregnant. A retrospective chart review of both maternal and newborn electronic medical records was performed to obtain results. Newborn neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) diagnosis, need for morphine, maternal safety and fetal/newborn complications were assessed. Maternal sobriety was documented with UDSs at the time of admission for delivery. Umbilical cord blood also was assessed for substances of abuse. An additional 182 pregnant women who lowered their buprenorphine doses but did not decide to end MAT were assessed via routine quality assurance methods. Results None of the women who stopped buprenorphine during their pregnancy as confirmed by UDSs and umbilical cord sampling delivered neonates who had NAS. Eleven patients ended MAT with medical assistance and 10 ended MAT without medical assistance. No overdoses were reported for the 182 additional pregnant patients who indicated an intention to taper buprenorphine dosage while pregnant but who did not decide to end MAT; the neonatal benefits were obtained without any identified maternal harm. Conclusions The neonates of pregnant women enrolled in an outpatient buprenorphine MAT tapering program who are able to completely stop taking buprenorphine (as documented by negative urinary drug screen) are very unlikely to have NAS. Further research will be important.

Substance use disorder (SUD) is a disease that continues to affect the lives of millions of Americans. Access to adequate treatment also continues to be a challenge for many of those suffering from substance use disorder. To better understand the barriers to treatment as well as the social challenges people face in seeking care for their substance use, we designed an observational study to capture demographic data, perceptions of stigma, and self esteem levels at a medication assisted treatment (MAT) facility in Northeast Tennessee. A robust survey was administered to patients at the MAT facility to quantify and analyze these metrics. Results from the survey showed when it came to stigma, respondents felt the highest level of internalized stigma compared to the other two types of measured stigma (enacted and anticipated). This was still the case even after stratifying based on gender. Regarding self esteem, survey results showed that as a whole, most respondents were within the normal range for self esteem, however, differences were appreciated when the data was categorized based on age. Finally, some of the most common reasons respondents selected for not seeking treatment previously were the thought that the problem could be handled alone, the lack of health insurance, and the fact that they were not ready to quit. A greater understanding of these issues is crucial for providers to better serve their patient population and tailor their services to the pertinent issues of the area.