Please read the abstract in the section 00front of this document Copyright 2000, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria. Please cite as follows: Beyers, L 2000, The structure of South African milk production technology: a parametric approach to supply analysis , MScAgric dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd- 02152006-112153/ > H128/th / Dissertation (MSc Agric (Agricultural Economics))--University of Pretoria, 2007. / Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development / unrestricted

Thesis (M. Sc. Agriculture (Agricultural Economics)) -- University of Limpopo, 2019 / The South African dairy industry is approximately 0.5% of the global production. The production of milk contributes to exports, manufacturing, employment, food security and development of other producers of agricultural products such as maize and soya bean. Following the deregulation of the agricultural markets in 1996, the dairy industry has seen a decline in the number of producers, with Milk Producer Organisation noting that between 2008 and 2015 there has been a decline of 58%. Therefore, the decline in producers necessitates the need to understand the nature and factors that influence the remaining producers to continue producing. This study, therefore, was undertaken to examine the supply response of milk production to price and non-price factors in South Africa using the Nerlovian Partial adjustment model. In that regard, the historical data for the period of 1996 to 2014 was used and analysed in Eviews 10 software. The short-run and Long-run elasticities of milk production were found to be inelastic. The results of the study further indicated that milk production was responsive to changes in price of beef, technology, previous production, and temperature. Given the study findings, thus recommendations made are that technological research and advancement, such as animal cross breeding is necessary to improve production of milk in the country. Furthermore, better price incentives such as price floors and subsidies are necessary in the industry, to encourage more milk production and reduce likelihood of farmers to switch from milk to beef, given the changes in price.

Thesis (M. Tech.) -- Central University of Technology, Free State, 2008 / Local government (LG) is under increasing pressure from the milk industry and consumers regarding their ability and willingness to carry out their mandate with regard to the quality control of milk, especially in the informal sector. The government and the milk industry currently have programmes underway to stimulate economic activities in the informal sector, targeting emerging cattle farmers for the production of milk as part of government’s Accelerated Shared Growth Initiative of South Africa (ASGISA). These initiatives further increase the number of informal milk producers and distributors, which holds a further challenge to regulatory authorities. At the same time, the quality of milk from the informal milk-producing sector poses a serious public health concern. Most of the milk produced and sold by the informal sector is raw (unpasteurised), which does not meet the minimum statutory requirements, and the milking practices applied by the informal sector also do not comply with best practice compliance standards. Local authorities (LAs) are statutorily responsible for registering milking parlours and controlling milk hygiene quality from production stage to purchase stage in order to ensure safe and wholesome dairy products to the consumer. Therefore, LG should play an increasingly important role in ensuring that safe and wholesome milk is produced and distributed to the consumers. All metropolitan municipalities (metros) and district municipalities (DMs) should be authorised by the Ministry of Health to enforce the Foodstuffs, Cosmetics and Disinfectants Act, 1972 (Act 54 of 1972) through their authorised officials – mainly environmental health practitioners (EHPs). Secondly, LG should have specific programmes, systems and resources to register, monitor, evaluate and control milk production and distribution outlets for continued compliance