• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

A critical discussion of Mawetse v Dilokong with regard to the nature of mineral rights

De Villiers, Michelle January 2019 (has links)
Section 5(1) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 28 of 2002 stipulates that a prospecting and mining right granted in terms of the aforementioned Act and registered in terms of the Mining Titles Registration Act 16 of 1967 is a limited real right in respect of the mineral and the land to which it relates. Section 2(4) of the Mining Titles Registration Act 16 of 1967 determines that registration of a prospecting or mining right in terms of that act constitutes a limited real right binding on third parties. Section 1 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 defines the effective date of a prospecting or mining right to be the date of execution thereof. In the judgement of the Minister of Mineral Resources and Others vs Mawetse (SA) Mining Corporation (Pty) Ltd, the Supreme Court of Appeal through Majiedt, J held that a prospecting right, and by implication a mining right, becomes enforceable on date of approval of the environmental management programme related to such right. In practice the approval of an environmental management programme occurs on date of execution. Considering this judgement and legislative provisions, it is obvious that a contradiction exist as to when a prospecting or mining right becomes enforceable against third parties such as landowners. The common law principle with regard to limited real rights are that limited real rights become enforceable upon registration against third parties on the basis that such registration serves as publication to the public of its existence and enforceability. The question arises whether the nature of prospecting or mining rights as limited real rights has changed from the aforementioned common law principle through the enactment of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 on whether the aforementioned act and the Mining Titles Registration Act 16 of 1967 incorporate this common law principle into the aforementioned legislation. The Mawetse - judgement deviates from both the provisions of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 and the aforementioned common law principle. It also deviated from previous case law which held that prospecting- and by implication mining rights are contractual in nature, by finding that they are the result of unilateral administrative action. If contractual in nature, it is arguable that prospecting or mining rights become enforceable on date of registration through the common law principles underpinning enforceability of limited real rights and if the result of unilateral administrative action, in terms of the Mawetse - judgement becomes enforceable on date of approval of the environmental management programme, which coincides with the date of execution. It is of importance to ascertain whether prospecting and mining rights are contractual in nature, the result of unilateral administrative action or hybrid of both to answer the question whether they are enforceable as limited real right before registration or only upon registration. The methodology to answer these questions entails a critical case study of the Mawetse - judgement and an analysis of the interpretation of statutory and common law. This dissertation will explore when prospecting and mining rights become enforceable against third parties such as landowners and secondary thereto, whether they are contractual in nature, the result of unilateral administrative action or a hybrid of both, in order to answer the primary and secondary questions that arise from the aforementioned. / Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019. / Public Law / LLM / Unrestricted
2

Environmental Control in Oil & Gas Exploration & Production : A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, West Africa

Ibem-Ezera, Victor January 2010 (has links)
<p>The goal of this study is to examine the environmental impacts of oil and gas exploration and production (E&P), the roles of legislation, and the environmental management strategies in the petroleum industry with respect to the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The study seeks to suggest sustainable solutions to the endemic economic, social, and environmental problems associated with oil and gas E&P in the region. The focus is on the environmental control in the upstream (E&P) operations of the oil and gas industry as it affects the Niger Delta region of Nigeria with a view to proffering sustainable solutions.</p><p>The heavily polluting activities and environmental impacts of the upstream oil and gas operations in the Niger Delta have over the years taken a routine dimension and are endemic as a result of inadequate environmental legislations and ineffective enforcements. Sequel to these environmental impacts is militancy, adoption of expatriates, communal conflicts, inter-ethnic conflicts, human right abuses, restiveness and other social vices as the study reveals. These social and environmental impacts of oil and gas activities in this region bring impoverishment, abject poverty, hunger, squalor, birth disease, gene mutation, and death while exposing inhabitants of the region to afflictions and diseases as the study explicitly documents.</p><p>The study also reveals that the persistence rate of unrest, restiveness, militancy and other social vices is as a result of non-dialogue status between the different stakeholders, lack of infrastructural development, lack of basic amenities, high rate of unemployment, poor policy construct, federalized mineral right / resource ownership structure, and the monopolistic nature of Nigeria’s foreign exchange earning in petroleum resources.</p><p>In this dissertation, both proactive and corrective measures to curb the menace of the social, economic and environmental impacts of oil and gas exploration & production operations in Nigeria are presented and discussed with suggestions to sustainable solution and development, better environmental legislation, and better resource policy construct while advocating for good industrial practices in the petroleum industry with emphasis on the Niger Delta region of Nigeria.</p>
3

Environmental Control in Oil &amp; Gas Exploration &amp; Production : A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria, West Africa

Ibem-Ezera, Victor January 2010 (has links)
The goal of this study is to examine the environmental impacts of oil and gas exploration and production (E&amp;P), the roles of legislation, and the environmental management strategies in the petroleum industry with respect to the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. The study seeks to suggest sustainable solutions to the endemic economic, social, and environmental problems associated with oil and gas E&amp;P in the region. The focus is on the environmental control in the upstream (E&amp;P) operations of the oil and gas industry as it affects the Niger Delta region of Nigeria with a view to proffering sustainable solutions. The heavily polluting activities and environmental impacts of the upstream oil and gas operations in the Niger Delta have over the years taken a routine dimension and are endemic as a result of inadequate environmental legislations and ineffective enforcements. Sequel to these environmental impacts is militancy, adoption of expatriates, communal conflicts, inter-ethnic conflicts, human right abuses, restiveness and other social vices as the study reveals. These social and environmental impacts of oil and gas activities in this region bring impoverishment, abject poverty, hunger, squalor, birth disease, gene mutation, and death while exposing inhabitants of the region to afflictions and diseases as the study explicitly documents. The study also reveals that the persistence rate of unrest, restiveness, militancy and other social vices is as a result of non-dialogue status between the different stakeholders, lack of infrastructural development, lack of basic amenities, high rate of unemployment, poor policy construct, federalized mineral right / resource ownership structure, and the monopolistic nature of Nigeria’s foreign exchange earning in petroleum resources. In this dissertation, both proactive and corrective measures to curb the menace of the social, economic and environmental impacts of oil and gas exploration &amp; production operations in Nigeria are presented and discussed with suggestions to sustainable solution and development, better environmental legislation, and better resource policy construct while advocating for good industrial practices in the petroleum industry with emphasis on the Niger Delta region of Nigeria.

Page generated in 0.0337 seconds