Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-10-09T12:16:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruna Cristina Neves Carnelossi.pdf: 2214443 bytes, checksum: f2f7ce95b0d2e570cfb2439032a16420 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-09T12:16:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Bruna Cristina Neves Carnelossi.pdf: 2214443 bytes, checksum: f2f7ce95b0d2e570cfb2439032a16420 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-08-31 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - CNPq / Access to money dissociated from the labor market, which is the purpose of this study, is addressed as a non-contributory social protection right in the form of income security right. We approached the perspectives of existing initiatives on access to money as a right of social protection for Brazilian citizens presented in three chapters. In the first, the demystification or the notion of labor as a hegemonic condition of access to money in a socioeconomic context governed by the fourth industrial revolution and through the immaterial economy, which is the chosen economic focus. Then, in the second chapter, the global growth of economic inequality and the growing need for non-contributory social protection in its income security format is the civilizing political focus used as axiological content which frames the empirical examination through the third approach of the study. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of historical forms instituted in Brazil, after 1988 Constitution, related to income security in the context of public social assistance policy. The identification of challenges to income security as a social and welfare right takes place through the empirical analysis of national provisions (Benefício de Prestação Continuada – BPC, in Portuguese) and the transfer of income from the “Bolsa Família Program” (PBF, in Portuguese). The logic of governmental management that preside these two devices, that operate forms of access to money dissociated from the labor market, paradoxically reiterates in their dynamics the liberal logic of the market, dissipating users of a possible contribution of right of citizenship. The applicant's needs, existence and experiences are rejected. Several revealing expressions emerge in the adverse conjuncture to the defense of income security as a socialwelfare right, under outrageous expressions of human dignity, the need for money to survive in the society of capital. This demonstrates the increasingly dramatic lack of protection that is exacerbated by the lack of access to a necessary standard of income security / O acesso ao dinheiro dissociado do mercado de trabalho, tema deste estudo, é aqui abordado como direito de proteção social não contributiva na forma de direito à segurança de renda. Abordam-se as perspectivas das iniciativas já existentes do acesso ao dinheiro como direito de proteção social ao cidadão brasileiro, apresentada sem três capítulos.No primeiro, a desmistificação, ou o descortinar da ideia de trabalho como condição hegemônica de acesso ao dinheiro num contexto socioeconômico regido pela quarta revolução industrial e pela economia do imaterial é o enfoque econômico escolhido.Em seguida, o crescimento global da desigualdade econômica e a crescente necessidade por proteção social não contributiva em seu formato de segurança de renda é o foco político civilizatório empregado como conteúdo axiológico que emoldura o exame empírico, por meio da terceira aproximação do estudo, presente no terceiro capítulo que focaliza a análise de formas históricas instituídas no Brasil, após a Constituição de 1988, relativas à segurança de renda no âmbito da política pública de assistência social. A identificação de desafios à segurança de renda como direito socioassistencial processa-se pela análise empírica dos dispositivos nacionais, o Benefício de Prestação Continuada (BPC) e a transferência de renda do Programa Bolsa Família (PBF). A lógica de gestão governamental que preside esses dois dispositivos, que operam formas de acesso ao dinheiro dissociado do mercado de trabalho, paradoxalmente reiteram em sua dinâmica a lógica liberal de mercado e esvaem seu usuário de um possível conteúdo de direito de cidadania.Desprezam-se necessidades, existência e experiências do demandatário. Na conjuntura adversa à defesa da segurança de renda como direito socioassistencial, emergem diversas expressões reveladoras, sob expressões ultrajantes à dignidade humana, da necessidade por dinheiro para sobrevivência na sociedade do capital. Expressa-se, assim, a desproteção, cada vez mais dramática, agravada pela destituição do acesso a um padrão necessário de segurança de renda

This thesis explores the part gambling plays in an urban setting in Highland Papua New Guinea. Gambling did not exist in (what is now) Goroka Town before European contact, nor Papua New Guinea more broadly, but when I conducted fieldwork in 2009-2010 it was an inescapable part of everyday life. One card game proliferated into a multitude of games for different situations and participants, and was supplemented with slot machines, sports betting, darts, and bingo and lottery games. One could well imagine gambling becoming popular in societies new to it, especially coming on the back of money, wage-work and towns. Yet the popularity of gambling in the region is surprising to social scientists because the peoples now so enamoured by gambling are famous for their love of competitively giving things away, not competing for them. Gambling spread while gifting remained a central part of the way people did transactions. This thesis resists juxtaposing gifting and selfish acquisition. It shows how their opposition is false; that gambling is instead a new analytic technique for manipulating the value of gifts and acquisitions alike, through the medium of money. Too often gambling takes a familiar form in analyses: as the sharp end of capitalism, or the benign, chance-led redistributor of wealth in egalitarian societies. The thesis builds an ethnographic understanding of gambling, and uses it to interrogate theories of gambling, money, and Melanesian anthropology. In so doing, the thesis speaks to a trend in Melanesian anthropology to debate whether monetisation and urbanisation has brought about a radical split in peoples' understandings of the world. Dealing with some of the most starkly ‘modern' material I find a process of inclusive indigenous materialism that consumes the old and the new alike, turning them into a model for action in a dynamic money-led world.