Spelling suggestions: "subject:"monocular blir"" "subject:"monocular blue""
1 |
Gait Alterations Negotiating A Raised Surface Induced by Monocular BlurVale, Anna, Buckley, John, Elliott, David 12 January 2008 (has links)
No / Falls in the elderly are a major cause of serious injury and mortality. Impaired and absent stereopsis may be a
significant risk factor for falls or hip fracture, although data from epidemiological studies are not consistent. Previous
laboratory based studies, however, do suggest that stereoacuity is an important factor in adaptive gait. The present study
investigates how acute impairment of stereopsis, through monocular blur of differing levels, ranging from 0.50 diopter (D)
to a monovision correction affected gait when negotiating a raised surface in elderly subjects.
Eleven elderly subjects (73.3 3.6 years) walked up to and negotiated a raised surface under nine visual
conditions, binocular vision, one eye occluded and 0.50 D, 1.00 D and monovision correction (mean 2.50 D 0.20 D)
with blur and occlusion either over the dominant or non-dominant eye. Analysis focused on foot positioning and toe
clearance parameters.
There was no effect of ocular dominance on any parameters. Monocular blur impaired stereopsis (p 0.01), with
more minor effects on high and low contrast acuity. Vertical and horizontal lead limb toe clearance both increased under
all levels of monocular blur including the lowest level of 0.50 DBlur (p 0.03) and monovision correction led to toe
clearance levels similar to that found with occlusion of one eye.
Findings demonstrated that even small amounts of monocular blur can lead to a change in gait when
negotiating a raised surface, suggesting acute monocular blur affected the ability to accurately judge the height of a step
in the travel path. Further work is required to investigate if similar adaptations are used by patients with chronic
monocular blur.
|
2 |
What Drives Adaptive Gait Changes to Acutely Presented Monocular Blur?Chapman, Graham J., Scally, Andy J., Elliott, David January 2011 (has links)
No / Purpose. To determine whether gait alterations due to monocular spherical lens blur were a safety strategy or driven by
lens magnification.
Methods. Adaptive gait and visual function were measured in 10 older adults (mean age, 74.9 4.8 years) with the
participants' optimal refractive correction and when monocularly blurred with 1.00 DS and 2.00 DS lens over the
dominant eye. Adaptive gait measurements for the lead and trail foot included foot position before the raised surface, toe
clearance of the raised surface edge, and foot position on the raised surface. Vision measurements included binocular
visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereoacuity.
Results. Equal levels of monocular positive and negative spherical lens blur led to very different stepping strategies when
negotiating a raised surface. Positive blur lenses led to an increased vertical toe clearance and reduced distance of the
lead foot position on the raised surface. Negative lenses led to the opposite of these changes.
Conclusions. Findings suggest that step negotiation strategies were driven by the magnification effect provided by the spherical
lenses. Steps appeared closer and larger with magnification from positive lenses and further away and smaller with minification
from negative lenses and gait was adjusted accordingly. These results suggest that previously reported adaptive gait changes
to monocular spherical lens blur were not safety strategies as previously suggested but driven by lens magnification. The
significance of these findings in terms of prescribing large refractive changes in frail older patients is discussed.
|
Page generated in 0.0364 seconds