My doctoral thesis “Essays on Lifetime Uncertainty: Models, Applications, and Economic Implications” addresses economic and mathematical aspects pertaining to uncertainties in human lifetimes. More precisely, I commence my research related to life insurance markets in a methodological direction by considering the question of how to forecast aggregate human mortality when risks in the resulting projections is important. I then rely on the developed method to study relevant applied actuarial problems. In a second strand of research, I consider the uncertainty in individual lifetimes and its influence on secondary life insurance market transactions. Longevity risk is becoming increasingly crucial to recognize, model, and monitor for life insurers, pension plans, annuity providers, as well as governments and individuals. One key aspect to managing this risk is correctly forecasting future mortality improvements, and this topic has attracted much attention from academics as well as from practitioners. However, in the existing literature, little attention has been paid to accurately modeling the uncertainties associated with the obtained forecasts, albeit having appropriate estimates for the risk in mortality projections, i.e. identifying the transiency of different random sources affecting the projections, is important for many applications. My first essay “Coherent Modeling of the Risk in Mortality Projections: A Semi-Parametric Approach” deals with stochastically forecasting mortality. In contrast to previous approaches, I present the first data-driven method that focuses attention on uncertainties in mortality projections rather than uncertainties in realized mortality rates. Specifically, I analyze time series of mortality forecasts generated from arbitrary but fixed forecasting methodologies and historic mortality data sets. Building on the financial literature on term structure modeling, I adopt a semi-parametric representation that encompasses all models with transitions parameterized by a Normal distributed random vector to identify and estimate suitable specifications. I find that one to two random factors appear sufficient to capture most of the variation within all of our data sets. Moreover, I observe similar systematic shapes for their volatility components, despite stemming from different forecasting methods and/or different mortality data sets. I further propose and estimate a model variant that guarantees a non-negative process of the spot force of mortality. Hence, the resulting forward mortality factor models present parsimonious and tractable alternatives to the popular methods in situations where the appraisal of risks within medium or long-term mortality projections plays a dominant role. Relying on a simple version of the derived forward mortality factor models, I take a closer look at their applications in the actuarial context in the second essay “Applications of Forward Mortality Factor Models in Life Insurance Practice. In the first application, I derive the Economic Capital for a stylized UK life insurance company offering traditional product lines. My numerical results illustrate that (systematic) mortality risk plays an important role for a life insurer's solvency. In the second application, I discuss the valuation of different common mortality-contingent embedded options within life insurance contracts. Specifically, I present a closed-form valuation formula for Guaranteed Annuity Options within traditional endowment policies, and I demonstrate how to derive the fair option fee for a Guaranteed Minimum Income Benefit within a Variable Annuity Contract based on Monte Carlo simulations. Overall my results exhibit the advantages of forward mortality factor models in terms of their simplicity and compatibility with classical life contingencies theory. The second major part of my doctoral thesis concerns the so-called life settlement market, i.e. the secondary market for life insurance policies. Evolving from so-called “viatical settlements” popular in the late 1980s that targeted severely ill life insurance policyholders, life settlements generally involve senior insureds with below average life expectancies. Within such a transaction, both the liability of future contingent premiums and the benefits of a life insurance contract are transferred from the policyholder to a life settlement company, which may further securitize a bundle of these contracts in the capital market. One interesting and puzzling observation is that although life settlements are advertised as a high-return investment with a low “Beta”, the actual market systematically underperformed relative to expectations. While the common explanation in the literature for this gap between anticipated and realized returns falls on the allegedly meager quality of the underlying life expectancy estimates, my third essay “Coherent Pricing of Life Settlements under Asymmetric Information” proposes a different viewpoint: The discrepancy may be explained by adverse selection. Specifically, by assuming information with respect to policyholders’ health states is asymmetric, my model shows that a discrepancy naturally arises in a competitive market when the decision to settle is taken into account for pricing the life settlement transaction, since the life settlement company needs to shift its pricing schedule in order to balance expected profits. I derive practically applicable pricing formulas that account for the policyholder’s decision to settle, and my numerical results reconfirm that---depending on the parameter choices---the impact of asymmetric information on pricing may be considerable. Hence, my results reveal a new angle on the financial analysis of life settlements due to asymmetric information. Hence, all in all, my thesis includes two distinct research strands that both analyze certain economic risks associated with the uncertainty of individuals’ lifetimes---the first at the aggregate level and the second at the individual level. My work contributes to the literature by providing both new insights about how to incorporate lifetime uncertainty into economic models, and new insights about what repercussions---that are in part rather unexpected---this risk factor may have.

無 / Existing literature has shown that force of mortality has amazing resemblance of interest rate. It is then tempting to extend existing model of interest rate model context to mortality modeling. We apply the model in Diebold and Li (2006) and other models that belong to family of yield rate model originally proposed by Nelson and Siegel (1987) to forecast (force of) mortality term structure. The fitting performance of extended Nelson-Siegel model is comparable to the benchmark Lee-Carter model. While forecasting performance is no better than Lee-Carter model in younger ages, it is at the same level in elder ages. The forecasting performance increases for 5-year ahead forecast is better than 1-year ahead comparing to Lee-Carter forecast. In the end, the forecast outperforms Lee-Carter model when age dimension is trimmed to age 20-100.