Spelling suggestions: "subject:"motor 1earning."" "subject:"motor _learning.""
51 |
Effects of observer's experience and skill level on learning and performance in motor skill modelingDowney, Margaret J. January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
52 |
Motor performance as a function of audience presence and evaluation potentialHalliwell, Wayne R. January 1973 (has links)
No description available.
|
53 |
An experimental study of the functions of three mnemonic strategies in the learning of movement sequencesDavenport, Esther Lee Burks 12 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
54 |
Interpreting visual information in motor learning /Dionne, Jennifer K. January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (M.Sc.)--York University, 2006. Graduate Programme in Kinesiology & Health Science. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 70-77). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:MR19733
|
55 |
Motor learning and adaptation the role of motor abundance /Yang, Jeng-Feng. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Delaware, 2007. / Principal faculty advisor: John P. Scholz, Dept. of Physical Therapy. Includes bibliographical references.
|
56 |
A general purpose paper tape tracking systemValladares, Miguel Rafael 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
57 |
Visual pretraining effects on coincident timing skill acquisition and retentionPellett, Tracy Lee January 1990 (has links)
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of visual pretraining on coincident-timing skill acquisition and retention. Two groups received varied visual pretraining experiences by viewing three different stimulus velocities on a Bassin Anticipation Timer runway before being transferred to active timing performances (acquisition, and retention phases) with the same stimulus velocities (12.8, 17.6, 22.4 k/h). A third group served as a control (NP group) and received no pretraining experiences. The blocked pretraining group (BP) received visual pretraining experiences at all stimulus velocities before being transferred to the active condition. The paired pretraining-acquisition group (PPA) also received pretraining experiences at the same three stimulus velocities. However, active performance trials immediately followed pretraining at each stimulus velocityThe results demonstrated that the PPA group performed with less absolute timing error and was less variable in traversing the second half of the movement during the acquisition phase. However, these results were not apparent during the retention phase. Overall, it was concluded that a trend existed for visual pretraining to be effective in fostering coincident-timing skill acquisition. / School of Physical Education
|
58 |
Visual-motor perception of first grade childrenSwickard, Ruby Shelton January 1978 (has links)
The purposes of the study were to (1) determine the correlation of visual-motor performance (as measured by a visual-motor integration test and writing assessment) with achievement scores in reading skills and spelling, and (2) to examine the possible effectiveness of using paper-pencil motor training as a means of aiding the development of perceptual-motor, handwriting, and reading skills.At the beginning of the school year, 76 first grade children in four classes in one school were given the following tests: the-Beery and Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, Metropolitan Achievement Tests, Primer Level, "Part 1: Listening for Sounds," and "Part 2: Reading" (items 1-28), and a handwriting test. Near the end of the academic year, in May, the copying children were given the same tests with the addition of five items on the Reading subtest, and a spelling test taken from the vocabulary of the Ginn series, Reading 360 Performance scores were used for within-group correlations of the variables and for comparisons of class achievement.Two of the classes received no special instruction in visual-motor perception. One experimental class was instructed with the Frostig Developmental Program in, Visual Perception, Pictures and Patterns, which uses geometric forms or drawings of objects for practice in perception, while the other experimental class utilized a program specifically designed for this study which employs alphabet and word-forms presented with the same worksheet format.Analysis of the data indicated that the observed within-group correlation of pretest scores of visual-motor integration and writing was significant at .40 (above .23 necessary to be statistically significant from zero). Visual-motor performance correlated significantly with listening for sounds (.28), but not with reading (.14). Correlations of pretest writing and reading skills were significant, .57 with listening for sounds, and .48 with reading as measured by the Metropolitan tests.In contrast with pretest results, the within-group correlations of posttest scores for the variables showed a very low correlation of VMI with writing (.12), and a lower correlation of writing with reading skills (.28 for both Metropolitan subtests). Correlation of VMI and reading skills showed a minimal significant correlation of .23 with reading, and .31 with sounds which was higher than the relationship noted in pretest score correlations.Correlation of pretest scores with posttest results was suggested for possible predictive use. The correlation of pretest writing with posttest listening for sounds (.42), with reading (.58) and spelling (.58) indicated that this comparison might be worthy of consideration for further investigation.To determine the effectiveness of visual-motor training a comparison was made of the four treatment groups using the pretest and posttest scores of performance on the visual-motor, writing, listening for sounds, and reading tests. In order to establish that the pretest scores of the classes were not significantly different and that the classes were equivalent, a multivariate and univariate analysis of variance with treatment for sex differences was made. The results indicated that the four treatment groups were not significantly different on the variables tested except for one measure of writing which was therefore not included in. the posttest analysis.The null hypothesis that there is no statistically significant difference between the vectors of mean posttest scores of children receiving perceptual-motor training and those who did not was not rejected, (F4 68 = .5193; p (.72). It was also concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between the performances of the two experimental groups, (F4,68 = .6408, p < .63); there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of performance of the two comparison groups, (F4 68 = .88, p < .4779).Although development of visual-motor perception may be important as a componentof growth and learning, the results of this study do not show significant correlation with reading achievement in first grade. Significant differences were not disclosed in two different approaches to perceptual motor development, one employing geometric forms, and the other alphabet letter symbols.
|
59 |
Effect of praise and age on intra-task integrationHelmy, Kamel January 1979 (has links)
No description available.
|
60 |
An exploratory study of some aspects of identifying and treating speaking and reading problems of eight and nine year olds by a psycho-neurological approach /Krause, Dorothy Elizabeth. January 1967 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Wisconsin State University (La Crosse), 1967. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves [74]-75).
|
Page generated in 0.0532 seconds