Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have gained a lot of atten- tion in the recent years. They have proven to be among the best multi-objective optimizers and have been used in many industrial ap- plications. However, their usability is hindered by the large number of evaluations of the objective functions they require. These can be expensive when solving practical tasks. In order to reduce the num- ber of objective function evaluations, surrogate models can be used. These are a simple and fast approximations of the real objectives. In this work we present the results of research made between the years 2009 and 2013. We present a multi-objective evolutionary algo- rithm with aggregate surrogate model, its newer version, which also uses a surrogate model for the pre-selection of individuals. In the next part we discuss the problem of selection of a particular type of model. We show which characteristics of the various models are im- portant and desirable and provide a framework which combines sur- rogate modeling with meta-learning. Finally, in the last part, we ap- ply multi-objective optimization to the problem of hyper-parameters tuning. We show that additional objectives can make finding of good parameters for classifiers faster. 1

Background: Multiple Objective Optimization problems(MOOPs) are common and evident in every field. Container port terminals are one of the fields in which MOOP occurs. In this research, we have taken a case in logistics management and modelled Multi-agent systems to solve the MOOP using Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II). Objectives: The purpose of this study is to build AI-based models for solving a Multiple Objective Optimization Problem occurred in port terminals. At first, we develop a port agent with an objective function of maximizing throughput and a customer agent with an objective function of maximizing business profit. Then, we solve the problem using the single-objective optimization model and multi-objective optimization model. We then compare the results of both models to assess their performance. Methods: A literature review is conducted to choose the best algorithm among the existing algorithms, which were used previously in solving other Multiple Objective Optimization problems. An experiment is conducted to know how well the models performed to solve the problem so that all the participants are benefited simultaneously. Results: The results show that all three participants that are port, customer one and customer two have gained profits by solving the problem in multi-objective optimization model. Whereas in a single-objective optimization model, a single participant has achieved earnings at a time, leaving the rest of the participants either in loss or with minimal profits. Conclusion: We can conclude that multi-objective optimization model has performed better than the single-objective optimization model because of the impartial results among the participants.