Spelling suggestions: "subject:"NEO fivefactor inventory"" "subject:"NEO fivefactor lnventory""
1 |
Self-awareness, self-consciousness and performance on the NEO-five factor inventory /Scandell, Donald James, January 1997 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Lehigh University, 1997. / Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 141-156).
|
2 |
Detecting intentional response distortion on measures of the five-factor model of personality an application of differential person functioning /Scherbaum, Charles A. January 2003 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Ohio University, August, 2003. / Title from PDF t.p. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 138-155)
|
3 |
Self-consciousness and the five factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflectionTrapnell, Paul David 05 1900 (has links)
A distinction between ruminative and reflective forms of dispositional self-focus is introduced and the theoretical utility of this distinction is evaluated in a program
of eight studies. Study 1 examined for the presence of this distinction among
natural language trait descriptors. Study 2 evaluated whether this distinction
provided a sufficient summary of relations between the Fenigstein, Scheier and
Buss (1975) Self-Consciousness scales and the Five Factor Model of personality
(FFM). In Study 3, two brief questionnaire measures of ruminative and reflective
tendencies were developed, and their convergent and discriminant validity
evaluated with respect to the FFM, and the Fenigstein et al. (1975) Public Self-
Consciousness (PUSC) and Private Self-Consciousness (PRSC) scales. Study 4
investigated the extent to which rumination and reflection separately account for
PRSC associations with measures of psychological distress (e.g., Beck
Depression scale) and intellective dispositions (e.g., Need for Cognition scale), respectively. Study 5 evaluated, using a sample of dormitory roommates, the
extent to which self-estimates of ruminativeness and reflectiveness correspond
with the judgments of a knowledgeable observer. Studies 6, 7, and 8 evaluated
the extent to which the traits of rumination and reflection separately account for
previously reported PRSC associations with three theoretically relevant criteria of
private self-consciousness: state indices of self-focused attention (Study 6), the
asymmetry effect in self-other similarity judgments (Study 7), and research
volunteerism (Study 8). Findings suggest that the PRSC scale confounds two
relatively independent, and motivationally distinct dispositions, rumination and
reflection, and that latent ruminative and reflective components of PRSC scores
separately and fully account for PRSC correlates and effects. These findings
provide a straight forward explanation of the "self-absorption" paradox implicit in
the PRSC research literature, i.e., the consistent but apparently contradictory
finding of more accurate and extensive self-knowledge, yet higher levels of
subjective psychological distress, among persons high in private self-consciousness. It is likely that the PRSC's associations with psychological distress are uniquely due to its neurotic component (rumination), and that the PRSC's self-knowledge effects are uniquely due its intellective component
(reflection). It is argued that rumination and reflection represent statistically and
functionally independent self-focusing tendencies. Their strong and unique
associations with the FFM dimensions of neuroticism and openness, respectively, imply a basic dichotomy of self-attentive motives: anxiety/fear and curiosity/exploration: rumination represents a useful summary conception of self-attentiveness motivated by perceived threats, losses, or injustices to the self;
reflection represents a useful summary conception of self-attentiveness
motivated by intrinsic curiosity, or epistemic interest in the self. It is concluded that the spatial metaphor of "direction" may not be an appropriate basis for a useful scientific conception of dispositional self-consciousness. The concept of a purely cognitive tendency to have attention chronically directed toward the self versus away from the self, construed independently of the emotional and
motivational determinants of such a tendency, is probably untenable.
|
4 |
The correlation between the social desirability and endorsement rate of test items on the SNAP and NEO-FFIPedregón, Cynthia Anita. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Texas at El Paso, 2008. / Title from title screen. Vita. CD-ROM. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.
|
5 |
Personality and music : an examination of the five-factor model in conjunction with musical preference /Perkins, Seth. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis -- Departmental honors in Psychology. / Running title: Connections between personality and music. Bibliography: ℓ. 46-47.
|
6 |
The five-factor model of personality and Axis I psychopathology : a multi-clinic analysis /Friesen, Christopher J. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--York University, 2008. Graduate Programme in Psychology. / Typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 110-135). Also available on the Internet. MODE OF ACCESS via web browser by entering the following URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:NR51707
|
7 |
The five-factor model and career self-efficacy general and domain-specific relationships /Hartman, Robert Owen, January 2006 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2006. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 104-120).
|
8 |
Competitive trait anxiety in relation to the five-factor model of personalityRubin, Leah January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Loyola College in Maryland, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 66-74).
|
9 |
Self-consciousness and the five factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflectionTrapnell, Paul David 05 1900 (has links)
A distinction between ruminative and reflective forms of dispositional self-focus is introduced and the theoretical utility of this distinction is evaluated in a program
of eight studies. Study 1 examined for the presence of this distinction among
natural language trait descriptors. Study 2 evaluated whether this distinction
provided a sufficient summary of relations between the Fenigstein, Scheier and
Buss (1975) Self-Consciousness scales and the Five Factor Model of personality
(FFM). In Study 3, two brief questionnaire measures of ruminative and reflective
tendencies were developed, and their convergent and discriminant validity
evaluated with respect to the FFM, and the Fenigstein et al. (1975) Public Self-
Consciousness (PUSC) and Private Self-Consciousness (PRSC) scales. Study 4
investigated the extent to which rumination and reflection separately account for
PRSC associations with measures of psychological distress (e.g., Beck
Depression scale) and intellective dispositions (e.g., Need for Cognition scale), respectively. Study 5 evaluated, using a sample of dormitory roommates, the
extent to which self-estimates of ruminativeness and reflectiveness correspond
with the judgments of a knowledgeable observer. Studies 6, 7, and 8 evaluated
the extent to which the traits of rumination and reflection separately account for
previously reported PRSC associations with three theoretically relevant criteria of
private self-consciousness: state indices of self-focused attention (Study 6), the
asymmetry effect in self-other similarity judgments (Study 7), and research
volunteerism (Study 8). Findings suggest that the PRSC scale confounds two
relatively independent, and motivationally distinct dispositions, rumination and
reflection, and that latent ruminative and reflective components of PRSC scores
separately and fully account for PRSC correlates and effects. These findings
provide a straight forward explanation of the "self-absorption" paradox implicit in
the PRSC research literature, i.e., the consistent but apparently contradictory
finding of more accurate and extensive self-knowledge, yet higher levels of
subjective psychological distress, among persons high in private self-consciousness. It is likely that the PRSC's associations with psychological distress are uniquely due to its neurotic component (rumination), and that the PRSC's self-knowledge effects are uniquely due its intellective component
(reflection). It is argued that rumination and reflection represent statistically and
functionally independent self-focusing tendencies. Their strong and unique
associations with the FFM dimensions of neuroticism and openness, respectively, imply a basic dichotomy of self-attentive motives: anxiety/fear and curiosity/exploration: rumination represents a useful summary conception of self-attentiveness motivated by perceived threats, losses, or injustices to the self;
reflection represents a useful summary conception of self-attentiveness
motivated by intrinsic curiosity, or epistemic interest in the self. It is concluded that the spatial metaphor of "direction" may not be an appropriate basis for a useful scientific conception of dispositional self-consciousness. The concept of a purely cognitive tendency to have attention chronically directed toward the self versus away from the self, construed independently of the emotional and
motivational determinants of such a tendency, is probably untenable. / Arts, Faculty of / Psychology, Department of / Graduate
|
10 |
A feasibility study of a computerized adaptive test of the international personality item pool NEOMcClarty, Katie Larsen, January 1900 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2006. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
Page generated in 0.0655 seconds