There are existing standards and guidelines for the effective management of infrastructure through infrastructure asset management planning (IAM). However, few if any of these standards explicitly address the financial implications associated with the uncertainty that underlies the risk associated with service provision. Without credibly quantifying the potential implications of this network variable uncertainty (i.e. an extreme weather event that affects the performance and costs of many segments within the study network, or the introduction of a new technology that may impact the network cost estimates) infrastructure management systems may actually regularly and significantly over or under estimate the actual financial requirements required to provide services. Therefore, financial projections may actually include a systematic bias. It was hypothesized that a model could be developed that quantifies and communicates the financial implications of network variable uncertainty within the IAM context. A model was developed to demonstrate how network variable uncertainty could be included in financial planning for infrastructure networks. The model was able to: (1) be applied to various types of infrastructure networks, (2) incorporate network variable uncertainty, (3) compare alternatives and scenarios, and (4) support effective communication of results. The outputs of the model were the average network annual worth (AW) and network present worth (PW). These outputs, along with tornado plots, risks curves, level of service dashboards, and existing budget levels, were used to communicate the impacts of the network variable uncertainty on the financial projections. The model was developed using Excel tools linked to DPL software to utilize probabilistic methods. The Life Cycle Cost (LCC) portion of the model was successfully verified against an existing infrastructure costing tool, the Land and Infrastructure Resiliency Assessment (LIRA) tool developed by the Agri-Environmental Services Branch of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The impact of the network variable uncertainty within the variables was also quantified in terms of levels of service provided by the organization. The developed model was first applied to a hypothetical twelve segment road network for illustrative purposes. For the hypothetical road network there were four events, representing network variable uncertainty, that were considered. These decisions or events included the: (1) decision to implement a new technology, (2) event of changing standards, (3) event of increased material costs, and (4) occurrence of an extreme rainfall event. The hypothetical network illustrated that if the defined decisions or events occurred then the expected network AW would increase by 41%. The impacts of decisions or events on the hypothetical network levels of service, stemming from network variable uncertainty, were also considered. The measured levels of service for the hypothetical network included the network financial sustainability indicator (an indicator reflecting the network current budget divided by the network annual worth as a percentage) and the frequency of blading of the roads. The model was next applied to a case study using the Town of Shellbrook sanitary main network. The Town has a large quantity of aging mains which were constructed in the 1960’s and are expected to require renewal in the near term. The network variable uncertainty for the case study resulted from the potential decision to implement a new trenchless technology for the renewal of sanitary mains. The new technology was expected to decrease the renewal costs. However, there was uncertainty as to what percentage of the sanitary mains would be found to be suitable for the new technology. Using the model it was determined that if the decision was made to implement the new technology, there would be an expected reduction of 17% in the network AW. The levels of service that were used for the Shellbrook case study were the network financial sustainability indicator (annual budget / network AW) and the meeting of standards set by regulating bodies. It was determined that the network financial sustainability indicator was sensitive to the decision to implement the trenchless technology, while the meeting of regulating bodies was not. If the decision was made to implement the new technology the network sustainability indicator would be expected to increase from 28% (if the new technology was not implemented) to 34% (if the new technology were implemented). The model was finally applied to a case study looking at the RM of Wilton gravel road network. The network variable uncertainty for this case study resulted from the potential increase in gravel material costs. The network variable uncertainty represented the magnitude of the annual increase in gravel costs. Given the event of increasing gravel costs the expected network AW would increase by 14%. The levels of service indicators used for the RM of Wilton case study were the network financial sustainability indicator and the frequency of blading. It was determined that the network financial sustainability indicator was sensitive to the event (increasing gravel costs), while the frequency of blading was not directly impacted (although it may be indirectly impacted). If the event of increasing gravel costs were to occur then the network financial sustainability indicator would be expected to decrease from 59% (if gravel costs did not increase) to 52% (if gravel costs did increase). This research proved that the hypothesis was correct, and that a model could be developed that quantified and communicated the financial implications and level of service impacts of network variable uncertainty for IAM planning. This research illustrated and quantified that IAM planning without accounting for network variable uncertainty, such as: (1) changing technology, (2) changing standards, (3) increasing material costs, and (4) extreme weather events, managers may introduce a systematic bias into long term planning. Network variable uncertainty can significantly impact the projected expenditures required for the long term provision of services. Infrastructure managers and decision makers need to manage infrastructure in a sustainable way over the long term in the face of uncertainty. It is necessary that decision makers have information regarding the impacts of network variable uncertainty on both LCCs and levels of service to make fully informed decision.