• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 3
  • Tagged with
  • 4
  • 4
  • 3
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Developing self-efficacy: an exploration of the experiences of new nurse managers

Hodgson, Alexis Kathleen 21 April 2015 (has links)
As nursing leaders, nurse managers are critical to the future of the healthcare system, as well as the nursing profession. Becoming a new manager or leader requires considerable development (Conners, Dunn, Devine, & Osterman, 2007); however, there is limited literature that focuses on the development of the nurse manager (Cadmus & Johansen, 2012). The purpose of this study was to explore the development of self-efficacy in nursing leaders, specifically new nurse managers. Albert Bandura’s (1997) self-efficacy theory was used to guide this study. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Two themes emerged from the data, describing experiences of self-efficacy, and the development of self-efficacy. A positive connection between experiencing a mentoring relationship and perceived self-efficacy emerged from the data. The findings of this study provide healthcare stakeholders an in-depth understanding of the importance of mentoring and it outcomes related to the development of self-efficacy in new nurse managers.
2

Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study of Newly Graduated Nurse and Teacher Sleep Experiences

Varner, Kendra 05 October 2021 (has links)
No description available.
3

QSEN Competency Confidence Levels in Two Groups of New Registered Nurses

Davila, Yvonne A. 01 January 2019 (has links)
Healthcare agencies and stakeholders expect registered nurses to be competent at all times. When nurses are not confident in competencies, negative patient outcomes can occur. The purpose of this quantitative quasiexperimental with posttest only study was to investigate Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competency confidence levels of 2 groups of new nurses who had 5-6 months of clinical experience. Framed by the Duchscher theory and the QSEN framework, the research question was developed to examine the differences between QSEN competency confidence levels of new nurses who participated in a prelicensure program plus a residency program and nurses who only attended the residency program. Sixty-eight new nurses from 1 health facility answered the Nursing Quality and Safety Self-Inventory (NQSSI). An independent t test was used to compare each knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) QSEN competency confidence levels for two groups. The results of this study demonstrated a difference between QSEN competency confidence levels between the 2 groups, but not all 18 NQSSI items reached a statistically significant difference. The 7 items that reached a statistically significant difference included the QSEN competency confidence level in knowledge and skills in evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and informatics. A statistically significant difference was also noted in the QSEN competency confidence level for patient-centered care skills. A 3-day professional development (PD) workshop was developed based on the results. Participating in the PD workshop could further increase the new nurses' QSEN competency confidence levels which can enhance patient outcomes resulting in positive social change.
4

Factors contributing to the commission of errors and omission of standard nursing practice among new nurses

Knowles, Rachel 01 May 2013 (has links)
Every year, millions of medical errors are committed, costing not only patient health and satisfaction, but thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Errors occur in many areas of the healthcare environment, including the profession of nursing. Nurses provide and delegate patient care and consequently, standard nursing responsibilities such as medication administration, charting, patient education, and basic life support protocol may be incorrect, inadequate, or omitted. Although there is much literature about errors among the general nurse population and there is indication that new nurses commit more errors than experienced nurses, not much literature asks the following question: What are the factors contributing to the commission of errors, including the omission of standard nursing care, among new nurses? Ten studies (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-mode) were examined to identify these factors. From the 10 studies, the researcher identified the three themes of lack of experience, stressful working conditions, and interpersonal and intrapersonal factors. New nurses may not have had enough clinical time, may develop poor habits, may not turn to more experienced nurses and other professionals, may be fatigued from working too many hours with not enough staffing, may not be able to concentrate at work, and may not give or receive adequate communication. Based on these findings and discussion, suggested implications for nursing practice include extended clinical experience, skills practice, adherence to the nursing process, adherence to medications standards such as the five rights and independent double verification, shorter working hours, adequate staffing, no-interruption and no-phone zones, creating a culture of support, electronically entered orders, translation phones, read-backs, and standardized handoff reports.

Page generated in 0.031 seconds