Call number: LD2668 .T4 1986 W23 / Master of Arts / Communication Studies

This research project was aimed at investigation of speech communication issues in industrial noise environments where workers utilize hearing protection devices (HPDs). A controlled empirical study was conducted to determine the effects of several independent variables on speech reception and discrimination including: l). subject's hearing configuration (unoccluded or earplug, earcap, earmuff-occluded), 2). ambient noise intensity level (60, 83 dBA), 3). ambient noise spectral type (low, white approximation, high frequency), 4). speaker's voice level (63 or 65 dBA in 60 dBA noise, 82 or 88 dBA in 83 dBA noise), and 5). subject's hearing level (normal hearing, slight loss, or moderate loss) used as a blocking variable. Isophonemic word discrimination, with male-voiced word lists presented through loudspeakers in an anechoic field, served as the experimental task. Twenty-three males and twenty-two females participated in the experiment and a mixed-factors, partial hierarchical design was used for data collection. Analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple-range tests were applied to the data. All main effects, with the exception of hearing level blocks, were significant, in addition to several interactions. These are discussed in detail and depicted graphically. One fundamental finding was that none of the hearing protection devices degraded speech discrimination (in comparison to an unoccluded condition) in the 83 dBA ambient noise level. In fact, the most protective HPD significantly enhanced speech discrimination in the high noise level. In the low ambient noise level, there was some reduction in discrimination due to the wearing of an HPD, but this effect is not of concern because HPDs are not needed at low ambient levels for protection purposes. From the results, it appears that properly selected HPDs can be expected to at least maintain speech discrimination levels (equivalent to unoccluded levels) in moderately-high intensity industrial noises of varied spectral characteristics. / Master of Science

A study was conducted to determine the dependency of sound attenuation capabilities of earmuffs and earcaps on various application instruction techniques including: (1) no instruction, (2) no instruction with 70 dBA auditory feedback, (3) manufacturers' package instruction, (4) detailed instruction, and (5) modeled instruction. The hearing protection devices (HPDs) studied were: two earcaps (Willson #20 Sound-Ban, Flents #055 Peace & Quiet Headband), and four earmuffs (E-A-R model 1000, Siebe Norton Industrial model 4540, Peltor H6A/v, and Willson 365A Sound Barrier). HPD comfort and wearer preferences were also assessed. Furthermore, typical excessive industrial machinery noises were sampled and analyzed across the 1/3 octave frequencies. Finally, an example is provided as to how these machinery noise spectra can be matched with HPD attenuation spectra to ascertain the protector which would afford optimal protection for a given noise situation. Fifty subjects (twenty-five males and twenty-five females) participated in the experiment. Attenuation characteristics of the HPDs were evaluated utilizing the real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) method. A three-way mixed factorial design was used for data collection and analysis of attenuation results. Bipolar scales were used to assess individual HPD comfort, and the HPDs examined were ranked to obtain user preferences. In the analysis of attenuation results, analysis of variance CANOVA) and pairwise comparisons were utilized to detect statistical significance. The comfort scales and ranking scores were evaluated using the Friedman one-way block design. Attenuation results for the earmuffs and earcaps tested showed that they were much less susceptible than earplugs (from a previous study by Epps, 1984) to changes in user insertion/donning instruction technique and also not as dependent on user gender. The main effect of gender was not significant, and in general, any instruction was better than no instruction at all but the effects of those instructions did not differ significantly among each other. As expected, there were main effect differences among the HPDs as to their attenuation capabilities, rated discomfort, and user preference. Because the main objective was on assessing donning instruction effects on HPD attenuation, the comfort/preference assessment was based on only a short (25 minutes) wearing time during the attenuation tests. Therefore, the comfort/preference ratings could likely vary given longer wearing periods and different work environments. All results found are discussed on the basis of the sample data obtained and conclusions drawn from these results should be limited to these experimental conditions and subsequent analyses, as actual attenuation achieved in practice may differ. The example of HPD-machinery noise matching illustrates that the attenuation/spectral matching procedure may indeed be a feasible way of selecting optimal protection for workers. / Master of Science

The need for hearing protection in industry has evolved from the growing awareness of the detrimental effects of noise on hearing and recent legislation enacted to protect the hearing of noise-exposed employees through the use of hearing conservation programs. In lieu of expensive or impractical engineering and administrative controls, personal hearing protection devices (HPDs) are considered to be the most practical and effective means of protecting employees from the damaging effects of noise in industry today.

Laboratory-obtained, manufacturer-supplied hearing protector attenuation ratings typically overestimate the workers' protection level In the workplace. In addition, several work-related in-field factors often degrade protection performance of the hearing protection devices (HPDs), posing the threat of underprotection for industrial workers. This research investigated the effects of HPD wearing time, subject activity movement, and HPD fitting procedure on the frequency-specific attenuation and user-rated comfort achieved with a popular foam cushion earmuff, two types of earplugs (user-molded foam and pre-molded, triple-flanged polymer), and an earmuff over foam earplug combination. Both attenuation and comfort data were collected from 40 naive but audiometrically normal subjects. Using a psychophysical real-ear-attenuation-at-threshoId-measurement procedure, attenuation data were obtained before, during, and after the activity movement tasks, which induced typical worker movements, so that the influence of wearing time and activity movement could be determined. Bipolar comfort rating data were also collected before and after the activity movement tasks, The results of statistical analyses indicated that achieved attenuation and user comfort significantly decreased over a two-hour wearing period and that training to achieve better fitting markedly improved protection, although these changes were device- and frequency-specific. Loss in frequency-specific attenuation over the wearing period was up to 6.3 dB for all HPDs except the foam plug, and attenuation Improvement due to training ranged from 4 to 14 dB for all HPDs except the earmuff at 1000 Hz and below. Almost no difference In achieved attenuation or comfort was found between the two activity (head/torso and temporomandibular) movements, but the earmuff tended to slip during highly kinematic head/torso movement. In general, out of the four different HPD configurations used in the study, the foam plug was very resilient to either type of activity movement but did benefit more than the other devices from the training for proper tilting; it was also perceived as the most acceptable and stable HPD by the subjects. In summary, the research illuminated the strong influence of in-field factors on HPD effectiveness. / Master of Science

Hearing protection devices (HPDs), a widely used countermeasure against noise-induced hearing loss, are laboratory-tested for their attenuation (noise reduction) capabilities. Unfortunately, laboratory tests overestimate the in-workplace performance of the devices, potentially leading to inadequate protection for the user. Many factors affect in-field effectiveness, including the physical design and "wearability" of the protector. Wearability, a highly subjective aspect which encompasses such characteristics as user comfort, ease of use, and acceptability, directly affects performance by influencing the regularity of use and the manner in which a protector is worn. This research investigated the influence of the user's work-related activities over a prolonged wearing period, and of variations in headband compression force and cushion material (liquid- or foam-filled) on achieved noise attenuation and wearability (comfort and acceptability) of earmuff hearing protectors. REAT (real-ear attenuation at threshold) testing procedures were used to collect attenuation data on 24 subjects, both prior-to and following completion of a simulated work task. Bipolar rating scales were utilized to collect pre- and post-task wearabi1ity data. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the work-related movement and wearing time significantly reduced achieved attenuation and, for higher compression earmuffs, also degraded perceived comfort and acceptability. A high headband compression force was 1inked to increased attenuation and to poorer user comfort and acceptance. The data revealed no significant difference in achieved attenuation or wearability between cushion types. The results illustrate the powerful influence of physical activity on HPD effectiveness and the criticality of certain earmuff design parameters to both attenuation and wearability. Furthermore, the existing tradeoff in earmuff design between comfort and attenuation was clearly demonstrated. / Master of Science