Spelling suggestions: "subject:"oon response"" "subject:"soon response""
301 |
Factors influencing expectancy change during delay in a series of trials on a controlled skill task /Schwarz, James Conrad January 1963 (has links)
No description available.
|
302 |
Efficiency of GSR conditioning as a function of CS-UCS interval /Vattano, Frank J. January 1962 (has links)
No description available.
|
303 |
The effects of instructions and S's need for approval on the conditioned galvanic skin response /Hill, Frances Aileen January 1965 (has links)
No description available.
|
304 |
Stimulus generalization of habituation of the galvanic skin response /Corman, Charles Dean January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
305 |
Response strength summation in a free operant as a function of discriminative stimulus and incentive /Wynne, Louis January 1967 (has links)
No description available.
|
306 |
Compounding and subtraction of two kinds of stimuli /Miller, Laurence Paul January 1968 (has links)
No description available.
|
307 |
Some effects of compound generalized stimulation along a wavelength continuum /Huff, Ronald Carson January 1969 (has links)
No description available.
|
308 |
Sensory preconditioning and higher order conditioning with discriminative stimuli in instrumental reward learning /Birkimer, John Charles January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
|
309 |
Measurement of extreme response : operational definitions and reliability /Donovan, Michael John January 1976 (has links)
No description available.
|
310 |
A Temporal White Noise Analysis for Extracting the Impulse Response Function of the Human ElectroretinogramZele, A., Feigle, B., Kambhampati, P., Aher, A., McKeefry, Declan J., Parry, Neil R.A., Maguire, John, Murray, I.J., Kremers, Jan January 2017 (has links)
Yes / Purpose: We introduce a method for determining the impulse response function (IRF)
of the ERG derived from responses to temporal white noise (TWN) stimuli.
Methods: This white noise ERG (wnERG) was recorded in participants with normal
trichromatic vision to full-field (Ganzfeld) and 39.38 diameter focal stimuli at mesopic
and photopic mean luminances and at different TWN contrasts. The IRF was obtained
by cross-correlating the TWN stimulus with the wnERG.
Results: We show that wnERG recordings are highly repeatable, with good signal-tonoise
ratio, and do not lead to blink artifacts. The wnERG resembles a flash ERG
waveform with an initial negativity (N1) followed by a positivity (P1), with amplitudes
that are linearly related to stimulus contrast. These N1 and N1-P1 components
showed commonalties in implicit times with the a- and b-waves of flash ERGs. There
was a clear transition from rod- to cone-driven wnERGs at ~1 photopic cd.m 2. We
infer that oscillatory potentials found with the flash ERG, but not the wnERG, may
reflect retinal nonlinearities due to the compression of energy into a short time period
during a stimulus flash.
Conclusion: The wnERG provides a new approach to study the physiology of the
retina using a stimulation method with adaptation and contrast conditions similar to
natural scenes to allow for independent variation of stimulus strength and mean
luminance, which is not possible with the conventional flash ERG.
Translational Relevance: The white noise ERG methodology will be of benefit for
clinical studies and animal models in the evaluation of hypotheses related to cellular
redundancy to understand the effects of disease on specific visual pathways.
|
Page generated in 0.0585 seconds