吳浣靑. / "2000年7月" / 論文 (哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2000. / 參考文獻 (leaves 149-154) / 附中英文摘要. / "2000 nian 7 yue" / Wu Huanqing. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2000. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 149-154) / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / 摘要 --- p.i-ii / 目錄 --- p.iii-iv / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1-13 / Chapter 第一節 --- 研究緣起與對象 --- p.2 / Chapter 第二節 --- 非營利組織政策倡導之文獻檢閱 --- p.6 / Chapter 第三節 --- 槪念整合 --- p.9 / Chapter 第四節 --- 硏究方法 --- p.10 / Chapter 第二章 --- 分析架構 --- p.14-44 / Chapter 第一節 --- 議程設定理論淺述 --- p.15 / Chapter 第二節 --- 政治、問題、政策三流程的內涵與運作 --- p.22 / Chapter 第三節 --- 非營利組織設定議程的策略 --- p.32 / Chapter 第四節 --- 結論：政策環境與議程設定的關係 --- p.38 / Chapter 第三章 --- 個案分析(一）殘障福利法的第一次修正與殘障聯盟的興起 --- p.45-68 / Chapter 第一節 --- 台灣地區身心障礙者槪況 --- p.45 / Chapter 第二節 --- 公共議程的論述與殘障權利運動的興起 --- p.47 / Chapter 第三節 --- 殘障聯盟的誕生與影響政治流程的策略 --- p.57 / Chapter 第四節 --- 決策議程的強化 --- p.63 / Chapter 第四章 --- 個案分析(二）殘障聯盟與身心障礙者保護法的訂定 --- p.69-109 / Chapter 第一節 --- 政治流程的變遷與政策的有限創新 --- p.69 / Chapter 第二節 --- 發展中的政策流程與問題流程 --- p.72 / Chapter 第三節 --- 進展緩慢的決策議程 --- p.81 / Chapter 第四節 --- 殘障聯盟的策略運用與政策視窗的開啓 --- p.94 / Chapter 第五章 --- 結論 --- p.110-124 / Chapter 第一節 --- 分析與發現 --- p.111 / Chapter 第二節 --- 討論與建議 --- p.120 / 附錄 --- p.125-148 / 附錄1殘障聯盟深度訪談 --- p.125 / 附錄2殘障聯盟深度訪談 --- p.127 / 參考書目 --- p.149-154 / 中文參考書目 --- p.149 / 英文參考書目 --- p.152 / 圖目錄 / Chapter 圖1-1 --- 福利鐵三角 --- p.3 / Chapter 圖1-2 --- 殘障聯盟組織架構圖 --- p.5 / Chapter 圖2-1 --- 議程與論述形式之關係 --- p.31 / Chapter 圖2-2 --- 政策倡導之分析架構 --- p.43 / 表目錄 / Chapter 表1-1 --- 台灣地區身心障礙福利機構統計 --- p.13 / Chapter 表2-1 --- 議程設定硏究典範的發展 --- p.16 / Chapter 表2-2 --- 政策環境的類型與分析面向 --- p.39 / Chapter 表3-1 --- 台灣地區身心障礙者人數比較 --- p.46 / Chapter 表3-2 --- 殘障者致殘原因統計 --- p.46 / Chapter 表3-3 --- 殘盟版經採納之條文 --- p.68 / Chapter 表4-1 --- 殘障政策的類型與分析面向 --- p.108 / Chapter 表4-2 --- 97年殘盟版經採納的條文 --- p.109 / Chapter 表5-1 --- 威權政體與民主政體政策過程之比較 --- p.119 / Chapter 表5-2 --- 社會變遷的理論與實踐 --- p.120

From the 1990s, welfare state and civil society in Taiwan were confronted with challenges and opportunities brought by population ageing. The author chooses NPOs with "Active Ageing" programs for the elderly, a group thriving as a consequence of Taiwan's unique transitional democratization and privatization under Neoliberalism, as a case to systematically investigate the governance structure. Four core NPOs of various scales and capacities are sampled while their stakeholders are also interviewed. Findings reveal that after the pension reform made possible by social movement and electoral politics, these institutionalized social forces secure their position in the welfare delivery system. However, problems remain unresolved because of structural inertia while NPOs operate under the changing field frame and conflicting institutional logics between the welfare state and civil society. Though partially impeded, NPOs develop an East-Asian way of solution with various counterplots. Contrasting rationales of networking explain NPOs' diverse achievements while quasi-subordination and structural loop consolidate respective constituency. Four patterns of perceived relational social capital relate to NPOs' networking practices and institutional settings. The connection among institutions, networking configurations, and relations further crystalizes the tripartite governance structure composed of the institutional, technical, and social environment. Legitimation of means functions mainly within the institutional environment while legitimation of ends through technical and social environment also justifies NPOs' social appropriateness. Various types of legitimacy are conferred to NPOs at different development stages while both formal and informal norms guide NPOs' behavior in the two-dimensional governing kinetics. Through this case study, the author also demonstrates how a meso-level approach of organizational study, integrating Sociological Institutionalism and Organizational Social Capital Theory, possibly sheds lights on the different areas of Sociology, especially those of social movement, NPOs, and ageing society.