The purpose of the study was to identify NANDA - I diagnoses, NOC outcomes, and NIC interventions used in nursing care plans for ICU patient care and determine the factors which influenced the change of the NOC outcome scores. This study was a retrospective and descriptive study using clinical data extracted from the electronic patient records of a large acute care hospital in the Midwest. Frequency analysis, one-way ANOVA analysis, and multinomial logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data. A total of 578 ICU patient records between March 25, 2010 and May 31, 2010 were used for the analysis. Eighty - one NANDA - I diagnoses, 79 NOC outcomes, and 90 NIC interventions were identified in the nursing care plans. Acute Pain - Pain Level - Pain Management was the most frequently used NNN linkage. The examined differences in each ICU provide knowledge about care plan sets that may be useful. When the NIC interventions and NOC outcomes used in the actual ICU nursing care plans were compared with core interventions and outcomes for critical care nursing suggested by experts, the core lists could be expanded. Several factors contributing to the change in the five common NOC outcome scores were identified: the number of NANDA - I diagnoses, ICU length of stay, gender, and ICU type. The results of this study provided valuable information for the knowledge development in ICU patient care. This study also demonstrated the usefulness of NANDA - I, NOC, and NIC used in nursing care plans of the EHR. The study shows that the use of these three terminologies encourages interoperability, and reuse of the data for quality improvement or effectiveness studies.

ABSTRACT This thesis represents a two phase, qualitative study using both Expert Review Panel and Delphi Panel research methods. The two research questions guiding this study were: 1) Phase I: What does culturally safe nursing practice mean, and how do we know when it is being practiced; and 2) Phase II: Can proposed culturally safe nursing practices be coded through use of International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) and/or Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC)? Originating from the field of nursing in New Zealand, there is interest in adopting cultural safety in Canada to support culturally safe nursing care for Canada’s Indigenous people (Canadian Nurses Association, 2009). A synthesis of the literature was conducted in Phase I of this study revealing six hallmarks of culturally safe nursing care. Those are: 1) Creating trust; 2) Relinquishing power over relationships; 3) Approaching people with respect; 4) Seeking permission; 5) Listening with your heart and ears; and 6) Attending to those who’s beliefs and practices differ. Representing culturally safe care of an Indigenous elder, a case scenario, developed by the principle investigator (PI), was presented to cultural safety experts (n=3) participating on an Expert Review Panel (ERP). The results of ERP showed that all six culturally safe nursing practices were represented in the case scenario. Validating that culturally safe nursing practices could be succinctly defined contributes to new knowledge, and most importantly informs nurses how to practice in a culturally safe nursing way. The purpose of using a Delphi panel method in Phase II was to see if culturally safe nursing practices in the case scenario could be represented in the ICNP® and NIC nursing languages by experts in those particular languages. To explore this two groups of subject matter experts in ICNP® (n=3) and NIC (n = 3) were invited to participate in separate Delphi panels. Overall, the Phase II Delphi panel results reflected the divergent way ICNP® and NIC are structured, in that terms alone do not provide enough contextual meaning to support clinical practice. The results of the ICNP® Delphi Panel showed that one ICNP® nursing intervention could represent culturally safe nursing care: Establishing Trust. Otherwise, the abstract composition of ICNP® terms affected the study results. The NIC Delphi panel results reflect the content and structure of NIC, and as such the experts identified the following four NIC nursing interventions that reflect culturally safe nursing care, they are: 1) Culture Brokerage, 2) Complex Relationship Building, 3) Emotional Support, and 4) Active Listening. Succinctly defining what nurses do is important; therefore, nursing languages need to be unambiguous, contextual so they are accurately and consistently documented. Validating culturally safe nursing practices exist—and further ensuring they are represented in standardized nursing languages and terminology sets and thus coded for use in an electronic health record (EHR)—ensures that culturally safe nursing care data is captured in the EHR. / Graduate

Trata-se de estudo descritivo, cujo objetivo foi analisar a aplicabilidade de intervenções da NIC no atendimento a crianças com o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas relacionada à presença de via aérea artificial" em um centro de terapia intensiva pediátrico (CTIP). Foi desenvolvido em três etapas. Na primeira, foram levantadas, junto às enfermeiras do CTIP, as atividades que prescrevem cotidianamente para crianças com esse diagnóstico de enfermagem. Foi realizado mapeamento comparativo dessas atividades, com 17 intervenções apresentadas na NIC para o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas". Na segunda etapa, esse mapeamento foi submetido à revisão por enfermeiras peritas. Na terceira etapa, 08 dessas intervenções foram selecionadas para análise, pelas enfermeiras, quanto à aplicabilidade, no CTIP, das atividades que não foram por elas mencionadas como prescritas cotidianamente na primeira etapa. Como resultados, obteve-se um total de 49 atividades listadas pelas enfermeiras como prescritas cotidianamente no CTIP para crianças com o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas relacionada à presença de via aérea artificial". Por meio do mapeamento comparativo verificou-se que, 74 das 403 atividades constantes das intervenções prioritárias e sugeridas da NIC possuíam correspondência com 39 atividades prescritas pelas enfermeiras. Na terceira etapa, as 08 intervenções selecionadas para análise pelas enfermeiras somaram 165 (100,0%) atividades. Destas, 45 (27,3%) haviam sido mapeadas como correspondentes às indicadas pelas enfermeiras na primeira etapa. Das 120 (100,0%) atividades restantes que foram analisadas quanto à sua realização ou não, 83 (69,2%) foram consideradas pela maioria das enfermeiras como realizadas, 36 (30,0%) como não realizadas e 1 (0,8%) foi considerada pela metade das enfermeiras como realizadas e pela outra metade como não realizada. Somando-se as atividades correspondentes na primeira etapa e as atividades consideradas realizadas na terceira etapa, se obteve um total de 128 (77,6%) atividades consideradas pela maioria das enfermeiras como realizadas Quanto ao percentual atribuído à realização das atividades por intervenção, obtivemos os seguintes resultados: “monitorização respiratória" (84,6%)", “aspiração de vias aéreas" (84,0%); “controle de vias aéreas" (80,0%); “inserção e estabilização de vias aéreas artificiais" (80,0%); “controle de vias aéreas artificiais" (80,0%); “fisioterapia respiratória" (76,9%); “assistência ventilatória" (75,0%) e “incremento da tosse" (36,4%). Concluímos que, houve um número menor de atividades consideradas não realizadas no CTIP em relação à intervenção incremento da tosse, porém, a maioria das atividades constantes na NIC e submetidas à análise pelas enfermeiras possui aplicabilidade no CTIP. / This descriptive study aimed at analyzing the applicability of NIC interventions in the care to children with the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance related to artificial airway" at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The study was developed in three phases. In the first one, the author found out, with nurses from PICU, the activities that are daily prescribed to children with this diagnosis. Based on this information, the activities were mapped and compared with the 17 interventions presented by NIC related to the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance". In the second phase, this mapping was submitted to a peers review. In the third phase, 8 interventions were selected for analysis by the nurses regarding their applicability at the PICU, among the activities that were not mentioned as daily prescribed in the first phase. Results showed a total of 49 activities mentioned by nurses as daily prescribed at the PICU for children with the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance related to artificial airway". Through comparative mapping, the author verified that 74 among the 403 activities related in the priority interventions and suggested by NIC had correspondence with 39 activities prescribed by nurses. In the third phase, the 08 interventions that were selected for analysis by nurses resulted in 165 (100.0%) activities. Among them, 45 (27.3%) were mapped with the correspondents indicated by nurses in the first phase. Among the 120 (100%) other activities that were analyzed regarding its performance or not, 83 (69.2%) were considered by the majority of nurses as performed, 36 (30.0%) as not performed and 1 (0.8%) was considered by half of the nurses as performed and by the other half as not performed. Summing up the activities of the first and third phases, the author obtained a total of 128 (77.6%) activities considered by the majority of nurses as performed. With respect to the percentage regarding the performance of these activities, it is important to mention the following results: Respiratory Monitoring (84.6%); Airway Suctioning (84.0%); Airway Management (80.0%); Airway Insertion and Stabilization (80.0%); Artificial Airway Management (80.0%); Chest Physiotherapy (76.9%); Ventilation Assistance (75.0%); Cough Enhancement (36,4%). The author concluded that there was few activities considered as not performed at PICU related to the intervention Cough Enhancement, however, the majority of NIC activities that were submitted to nurses’ analysis are applicable at PICU.

Trata-se de estudo descritivo, cujo objetivo foi analisar a aplicabilidade de intervenções da NIC no atendimento a crianças com o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas relacionada à presença de via aérea artificial” em um centro de terapia intensiva pediátrico (CTIP). Foi desenvolvido em três etapas. Na primeira, foram levantadas, junto às enfermeiras do CTIP, as atividades que prescrevem cotidianamente para crianças com esse diagnóstico de enfermagem. Foi realizado mapeamento comparativo dessas atividades, com 17 intervenções apresentadas na NIC para o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas”. Na segunda etapa, esse mapeamento foi submetido à revisão por enfermeiras peritas. Na terceira etapa, 08 dessas intervenções foram selecionadas para análise, pelas enfermeiras, quanto à aplicabilidade, no CTIP, das atividades que não foram por elas mencionadas como prescritas cotidianamente na primeira etapa. Como resultados, obteve-se um total de 49 atividades listadas pelas enfermeiras como prescritas cotidianamente no CTIP para crianças com o diagnóstico de enfermagem “desobstrução ineficaz de vias aéreas relacionada à presença de via aérea artificial”. Por meio do mapeamento comparativo verificou-se que, 74 das 403 atividades constantes das intervenções prioritárias e sugeridas da NIC possuíam correspondência com 39 atividades prescritas pelas enfermeiras. Na terceira etapa, as 08 intervenções selecionadas para análise pelas enfermeiras somaram 165 (100,0%) atividades. Destas, 45 (27,3%) haviam sido mapeadas como correspondentes às indicadas pelas enfermeiras na primeira etapa. Das 120 (100,0%) atividades restantes que foram analisadas quanto à sua realização ou não, 83 (69,2%) foram consideradas pela maioria das enfermeiras como realizadas, 36 (30,0%) como não realizadas e 1 (0,8%) foi considerada pela metade das enfermeiras como realizadas e pela outra metade como não realizada. Somando-se as atividades correspondentes na primeira etapa e as atividades consideradas realizadas na terceira etapa, se obteve um total de 128 (77,6%) atividades consideradas pela maioria das enfermeiras como realizadas Quanto ao percentual atribuído à realização das atividades por intervenção, obtivemos os seguintes resultados: “monitorização respiratória” (84,6%)”, “aspiração de vias aéreas” (84,0%); “controle de vias aéreas” (80,0%); “inserção e estabilização de vias aéreas artificiais” (80,0%); “controle de vias aéreas artificiais” (80,0%); “fisioterapia respiratória” (76,9%); “assistência ventilatória” (75,0%) e “incremento da tosse” (36,4%). Concluímos que, houve um número menor de atividades consideradas não realizadas no CTIP em relação à intervenção incremento da tosse, porém, a maioria das atividades constantes na NIC e submetidas à análise pelas enfermeiras possui aplicabilidade no CTIP. / This descriptive study aimed at analyzing the applicability of NIC interventions in the care to children with the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance related to artificial airway” at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The study was developed in three phases. In the first one, the author found out, with nurses from PICU, the activities that are daily prescribed to children with this diagnosis. Based on this information, the activities were mapped and compared with the 17 interventions presented by NIC related to the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance”. In the second phase, this mapping was submitted to a peers review. In the third phase, 8 interventions were selected for analysis by the nurses regarding their applicability at the PICU, among the activities that were not mentioned as daily prescribed in the first phase. Results showed a total of 49 activities mentioned by nurses as daily prescribed at the PICU for children with the nursing diagnosis “ineffective airway clearance related to artificial airway”. Through comparative mapping, the author verified that 74 among the 403 activities related in the priority interventions and suggested by NIC had correspondence with 39 activities prescribed by nurses. In the third phase, the 08 interventions that were selected for analysis by nurses resulted in 165 (100.0%) activities. Among them, 45 (27.3%) were mapped with the correspondents indicated by nurses in the first phase. Among the 120 (100%) other activities that were analyzed regarding its performance or not, 83 (69.2%) were considered by the majority of nurses as performed, 36 (30.0%) as not performed and 1 (0.8%) was considered by half of the nurses as performed and by the other half as not performed. Summing up the activities of the first and third phases, the author obtained a total of 128 (77.6%) activities considered by the majority of nurses as performed. With respect to the percentage regarding the performance of these activities, it is important to mention the following results: Respiratory Monitoring (84.6%); Airway Suctioning (84.0%); Airway Management (80.0%); Airway Insertion and Stabilization (80.0%); Artificial Airway Management (80.0%); Chest Physiotherapy (76.9%); Ventilation Assistance (75.0%); Cough Enhancement (36,4%). The author concluded that there was few activities considered as not performed at PICU related to the intervention Cough Enhancement, however, the majority of NIC activities that were submitted to nurses’ analysis are applicable at PICU.