1 Intellectual property objects created in labour-law relationships in the Czech Republic and selected countries of the European Union Abstract The contemporary modern period of 21st century is characterised by a constantly developing progress, new information technologies as well as innovative tendencies in all spheres of human life, allowing individuals their own self-fulfilment through their own intellectual activity. It is not unusual for an intangible property to be created as a result of human intellectual activity carried out during a labour-law relationship. As a result thereof, a legal regulation of the mutual relationships of the contractual parties, i.e. the employee and the employer, with respect to the result of such a human intellectual activity, is necessary. The submitted dissertation thesis deals with a legal regulation of the intellectual property objects created by employees in the course of labour-law relationships de lege lata in the Czech Republic and in the selected countries of the European Union, i.e. the France and the United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The dissertation thesis is composed of five coherent chapters, whereby the third chapter dealing with the legal regulation de lege lata of selected intellectual property objects created by employees in the...

The terms “anti-juridicity” and “custodial sentences” are widely used in the legal world. In this article, the author encourages to question both terms, analyzing if they are coherent with, precisely, what is understood as Law. First, the author wonders if it is correct to talk about “antijuridicity”, taking into account the subject of Law, the ways in which Law is manifested, and the relation between juridicity and Law.Further on, the author analyses if it is correct to talk about a “custodial sentence”, considering the relation between liberty and the human being. All through the article, the author also recounts how the ideas in Law have evolved through recenthistory. / Los términos “antijuridicidad” y “pena privativa de la libertad” son bastante utilizados en el medio legal. El autor del presente artículo invita a cuestionar ambos términos, analizando si son coherentes con, precisamente, lo que se entiende como Derecho. Así, en primer lugar se plantea si es correcto hablar de “antijuridicidad”, teniendo en cuenta el objeto del Derecho, las formas en que se manifiesta el Derecho y la relación entre este y la juridicidad. Asimismo, analiza si es correcto hablar de una “pena privativa de la libertad”, teniendo en cuenta la relación entre ser humano y libertad. Todo ello lo realiza mientras hace un recuento de cómo se ha producido la evolución del pensamiento en el Derecho a lo largo de la historia reciente