This study was designed to describe the use of analgesics ordered pro re nata (PRN) in the management of acute post-operative pain. Specifically, the study purpose was to answer the following questions. What amounts and frequencies of analgesic are ordered PRN by physicians for patients in the first 48 hours following a cholecystectomy? What amounts and frequencies of analgesic are given by nurses to patients in the first 48 hours following a cholecystectomy? What is the patient's summational description of his/her pain at 24 and 48 hours following a cholecystectomy? A descriptive survey design was used. A convenience sample of 22 subjects participated in the study. These subjects met the study criteria and were scheduled for elective cholecystectomy at one of the two hospitals used. Data were gathered by auditing the charts for information pertinent to the prescriptions and administration of the analgesics and by interviewing the subjects. There was considerable variability in the amounts and frequencies of analgesics prescribed and in those given to the post-operative subjects. No routine patterns were identified. There was a significant difference in the amounts of analgesics prescribed and given between the two hospitals, the reasons for which were not explored. The decision to use the PRN-prescribed analgesics appeared to be made by the nurses but evidence of accountability taken by nurses for their role in assessing pain and evaluating the effectiveness of the analgesics was not reflected in the reviewed records. Analgesics for use in the Post-Anaesthetic Recovery Room in the immediate post-operative period were prescribed by the anaesthetists. All initial analgesics were given by the intravenous route in this setting. Subjects at Hospital B were prescribed and received considerably more analgesics (83%) than those at Hospital A. Analgesics for use on the ward were prescribed by the surgeons. All orders were for meperidine hydrochloride to be given PRN and all orders were unchanged for the 48-hour period studied. The amount of meperidine prescribed and given per intramuscular dose was usually within the 75 to 100 milligrams optimal dosage range for the drug. The meperidine was usually prescribed with a four hour interval between doses. Doses of meperidine were given with considerably longer intervals between doses than the duration of action of the drug. For the 48-hour period, the mean total amount prescribed, based on the maximum possible dosage was 1154 milligrams. The median total amount prescribed was 1050 milligrams. The mean total amount given was 625 milligrams or 54% of the prescribed amount and the median total amount given was 587 milligrams or 56% of the prescribed amount. Subjects on the ward at Hospital A were prescribed and given significantly more meperidine than those at Hospital B. The patients' summational descriptions of their pain emphasized the individuality of the pain experience. The physical sensations described were consistent with previous literature descriptions of postoperative pain. The subjective data collected reflected the difficulties and complexities of pain management. An often-stated assumption in the literature is that nurses use PRN-prescribed analgesics inappropriately in managing post-operative pain; that is, patients are uncomfortable because the analgesics are not given in adequate amounts or frequently enough. In this study, a relationship was not identified between the amounts of meperidine received by subjects and how they reported their post-operative pain. This finding suggests that the assumption, that increasing the analgesics used would increase patient comfort, requires further investigation. Based on the findings of this study, implications for postoperative pain management and nursing practice, and suggestions for further research were made. / Applied Science, Faculty of / Nursing, School of / Graduate

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Univ., 2003. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Florida, 2004. / Typescript. Title from title page of source document. Document formatted into pages; contains 102 pages. Includes Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

<p>The aim of this thesis was to identify important aspects of surgical nursing care, designing strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management, investigate content validity, develop and evaluate psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the indicators, test the applicability of the instrument and investigate patient and nurse assessment.</p><p>To identify the important aspects of nursing care which might impact on quality of care in surgical wards, it was conducted 4 focus group interviews with clinical nurses (n=20). A tentative model with 15 categories in 2 dimensions, elements of performance and prerequisites, emerged from the data analysis. The categories were, e.g. detecting and acting on signs and symptoms, informing and educating, promoting relationships, responsibility and attitudes. The model was used as a foundation for developing indicators in postoperative pain management, one in each category, each supported by a literature review. To assess the content validity of the indicators, a questionnaire was compiled and sent to registered nurses with a special interest in pain (n=210) and to a random sample of clinical nurses working in surgical wards (n=321). The groups assessed the indicators as essential for achieving high quality, realistic to carry out and possible for nurses to influence management. The first group validated 14 of the 15 indicators and the second group validated 12 as “major” factors in terms of being essential to achieve high quality of care. The remaining factors were classified as “supportive”. No indicator was discarded.</p><p>To measure the indicators, an instrument was developed and psychometric properties were evaluated. The indicators were converted to statements suitable for a patient questionnaire and were scored on a 5-point scale with higher values indicating higher quality of care. Patients (n=198) answered the questionnaire on their second postoperative day. The inter-item and item-total correlation coefficients were in a satisfactory range, and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (0.84) supported internal consistency reliability. Four sub-scales, entitled communication, action, trust and environment emerged from the factor analysis with a total variance of 61.4%. The total scale correlated (rs=0.53) with the single item pain-relief-satisfaction question. The patients who reported more pain than expected scored lower on the total scale and the patients who received epidural analgesia reported higher scores on the total scale. A nurse questionnaire, similar to the patient questionnaire, was compiled. The responsible nurse at the time (n=63) answered 196 questionnaires paired with the individual patient. The new instrument appeared to be useful in identifying important areas for improvement both from the patients’ and nurses’ perspectives, based on the number of disagreements (1 and 2). Differences were found among departments. The patients’ assessments on the environment sub-scale and the overall satisfaction question were higher than the nurses’ assessments. The findings suggest initial support for the instrument as a means to measure the quality of nursing care in postoperative pain management. Key words: quality indicators; health care, pain; postoperative, focus groups, psychometrics, questionnaires, nursing care.</p> / On the day of the public defence of the doctoral thesis the status of the articles III was: Accepted; article IV and V was: Accepted for publishing.

The aim of this thesis was to identify important aspects of surgical nursing care, designing strategic and clinical quality indicators in postoperative pain management, investigate content validity, develop and evaluate psychometric properties of an instrument to measure the indicators, test the applicability of the instrument and investigate patient and nurse assessment. To identify the important aspects of nursing care which might impact on quality of care in surgical wards, it was conducted 4 focus group interviews with clinical nurses (n=20). A tentative model with 15 categories in 2 dimensions, elements of performance and prerequisites, emerged from the data analysis. The categories were, e.g. detecting and acting on signs and symptoms, informing and educating, promoting relationships, responsibility and attitudes. The model was used as a foundation for developing indicators in postoperative pain management, one in each category, each supported by a literature review. To assess the content validity of the indicators, a questionnaire was compiled and sent to registered nurses with a special interest in pain (n=210) and to a random sample of clinical nurses working in surgical wards (n=321). The groups assessed the indicators as essential for achieving high quality, realistic to carry out and possible for nurses to influence management. The first group validated 14 of the 15 indicators and the second group validated 12 as “major” factors in terms of being essential to achieve high quality of care. The remaining factors were classified as “supportive”. No indicator was discarded. To measure the indicators, an instrument was developed and psychometric properties were evaluated. The indicators were converted to statements suitable for a patient questionnaire and were scored on a 5-point scale with higher values indicating higher quality of care. Patients (n=198) answered the questionnaire on their second postoperative day. The inter-item and item-total correlation coefficients were in a satisfactory range, and Cronbach’s coefficient alpha (0.84) supported internal consistency reliability. Four sub-scales, entitled communication, action, trust and environment emerged from the factor analysis with a total variance of 61.4%. The total scale correlated (rs=0.53) with the single item pain-relief-satisfaction question. The patients who reported more pain than expected scored lower on the total scale and the patients who received epidural analgesia reported higher scores on the total scale. A nurse questionnaire, similar to the patient questionnaire, was compiled. The responsible nurse at the time (n=63) answered 196 questionnaires paired with the individual patient. The new instrument appeared to be useful in identifying important areas for improvement both from the patients’ and nurses’ perspectives, based on the number of disagreements (1 and 2). Differences were found among departments. The patients’ assessments on the environment sub-scale and the overall satisfaction question were higher than the nurses’ assessments. The findings suggest initial support for the instrument as a means to measure the quality of nursing care in postoperative pain management. Key words: quality indicators; health care, pain; postoperative, focus groups, psychometrics, questionnaires, nursing care. / On the day of the public defence of the doctoral thesis the status of the articles III was: Accepted; article IV and V was: Accepted for publishing.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Linköping : Linköpings universitet, 2007. / Härtill 5 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Stockholm : Karolinska institutet, 2006. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Diss. (sammanfattning) Umeå : Umeå universitet, 2006. / Härtill 4 uppsatser.

Thesis (M.Sc. (Nursing)--Mahidol University, 1979.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1979.