Thesis (Ph. D.)--Syracuse University, 1982. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 566-586).

Thesis (M.A.)--Ohio State University, 1959. / Electrostatic copy of typescript. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 102-108). Available online via OhioLINK's ETD Center

No description available.

No description available.

Inaug.-Diss.--Erlangen. / "Literatur": p. 70-72.

Thesis--Utrecht. / Includes index.

This thesis examines the transformation in the representation of painters during Charles LeBrun's tenure as Life-Chancellor to the Academie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture, from an initial definition in terms of the monarchy at Versailles to one founded on the practice of the art of painting. To promote the status of painters and painting, Louis XIV was celebrated as the protector of the arts in a royal portrait by Henri Testelin and was depicted as the ideal subject of art in paintings by Nicolas Loir and others. A painter's stature was then derived from the skillful manner in which he painted the history of the King. Engraved portraits accompanied by verse of Charles LeBrun and Adam Frans Van der Meulen identify allegorical painters as more distinguished than those who painted in a natural style. In both cases, Louis XIV is posited as being the source, subject, and eloquence of the art celebrating his achievements. Nicolas de Largillierre's Portrait of Charles Lebrun is modeled on Testelin's royal portrait and offers a portrayal of the artist which advocates service to the monarchy, but it grounds aesthetic activity in the body of the painter. This conception of LeBrun, in turn, serves as a paradigm for Pierre Mignard to create a self-portrait that proclaims his status in relation to the art of painting rather than through service to the King.

This thesis explores Baglione's contributions to art and to the history of art by examining the nature of his artistic and critical originality and the significant influences thereon. In the work for which he is best known, Le Vite ... (1642), Baglione was an interesting and generous critic who was unusually receptive to pictorial effects, even when in architecture and sculpture. He assesses Caravaggio's accomplishments with well chosen observations thereby breaking his restriction to discuss only accessible works of art. A broad view of his paintings and drawings shows Baglione's complex, original and thoughtful voyage of discovery assisted by the intelligence with which he absorbed artistic influences, particularly from Raphael and the Cavalier d'Arpino. His refined style of drawing distances him from Caravaggio. In paintings from the first decade, light and shadow give form to graceful figures enveloped in voluminous garments. After 1610 the compositions become more inventive and increasingly Baroque. Baglione's attempt to make a synthesis out of ideal generalization and naturalistic description and to explore new subject matter constituted a search for a "maniera propria" that combined stylistic originality with a penchant for unusual iconography. The most important trends in Baglione's draughtsmanship are the tendency towards a broader, freer handling and the versatility with which he handles the technical means at his disposal. Though he often crosses over the line into the Baroque, the idealism of his Tusco-Roman formation and fondness for angular lines constrain him from fully yielding to a dynamic disposition. His very personal style can be seen in a number of drawings from the 1620s and 1630s that attain a remarkable pictorial aspect and a Baroque quality of sensual presence. His sophisticated use of the three chalk technique prefigures the form dissolving effects to be popularized by Watteau. At the same time, the defining contour line that emphasizes integrity is not abandoned.

Research Doctorate - Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / How do Anglo-Australian artists paint themselves into the landscape with relevance and integrity, in spite of our complicated history? How do we submit to our own ‘small narratives’ and express an experience of land which considers but is not muted by postcolonial dialogues? How do individual artists form a visual language respondent to place and instructed by creative chance? The painting studio is where these questions are raised and where formal problems arise. Disparate ideas are tested in the search for marks and images to build an ambiguous sensation of place. Reflection, doubt, and wonder are the forces behind the paintings, but landscape is the sustaining narrative, and the inquiry is personal, equivocal. A remote valley on the Ellenborough River forms the back-ground to the current body of work, but my practice has taken me to desert communities during the past decade. Living and working in these environments where Indigenous artists paint without inherent effort, immersed in their big narratives of country, our choice to paint landscape is a continual challenge. Regular field trips to the valley and visits back to the desert, immersion in the patterns and phenomena of land, issues of belonging, impermanence and nostalgia have driven this investigation. The almost anachronistic studio practice results in an exhibition of on-site drawings and painted landscape memoirs. In the exegesis I examine my work through the prism of paintings by Indigenous artists from Haasts Bluff and Milikapiti. Non-Indigenous artists who engage with issues of landscape in a contemporary Australian context are also investigated, with a focus on cross-cultural dialogues, collaborations and formal painterly responses.

Research Doctorate - Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / How do Anglo-Australian artists paint themselves into the landscape with relevance and integrity, in spite of our complicated history? How do we submit to our own ‘small narratives’ and express an experience of land which considers but is not muted by postcolonial dialogues? How do individual artists form a visual language respondent to place and instructed by creative chance? The painting studio is where these questions are raised and where formal problems arise. Disparate ideas are tested in the search for marks and images to build an ambiguous sensation of place. Reflection, doubt, and wonder are the forces behind the paintings, but landscape is the sustaining narrative, and the inquiry is personal, equivocal. A remote valley on the Ellenborough River forms the back-ground to the current body of work, but my practice has taken me to desert communities during the past decade. Living and working in these environments where Indigenous artists paint without inherent effort, immersed in their big narratives of country, our choice to paint landscape is a continual challenge. Regular field trips to the valley and visits back to the desert, immersion in the patterns and phenomena of land, issues of belonging, impermanence and nostalgia have driven this investigation. The almost anachronistic studio practice results in an exhibition of on-site drawings and painted landscape memoirs. In the exegesis I examine my work through the prism of paintings by Indigenous artists from Haasts Bluff and Milikapiti. Non-Indigenous artists who engage with issues of landscape in a contemporary Australian context are also investigated, with a focus on cross-cultural dialogues, collaborations and formal painterly responses.